Like there's an implicit assumption that the wagon is pure that I think is +scum
VOTE: python
There is no such assumption, implicit or otherwise.
Like, this is a perfectly valid argument as long as one doesn't pay mind on the unsoundness of the premise that it asserts, that I think is +scum
Like there's an implicit assumption that the wagon is pure that I think is +scum
VOTE: python
There is no such assumption, implicit or otherwise.
Like, this is a perfectly valid argument as long as one doesn't pay mind on the unsoundness of the premise that it asserts, that I think is +scum
In post 89, heipizhu4 wrote:
I have a feeling I got wagoned whenever I tried to push the game out of rvs as town ...
He's still got his vote on NM from rvs and hasn't pushed anyone, wtf are you talking about
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Like he didn't even ask questions to try to figure out if there's scum motivation for voting him, he just immediately went "yeah ok". How is that not implicitly assuming the wagon is pure?
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
mostly agree with above, though i can see bianco as town who just doesn't like calling things ai
In post 101, biancospino wrote:
There is no such assumption, implicit or otherwise.
Like, this is a perfectly valid argument as long as one doesn't pay mind on the unsoundness of the premise that it asserts, that I think is +scum
bianco's position is that if the assumption is there it's +scum but that the assumption isn't there
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 105, usesPython wrote:
Like he didn't even ask questions to try to figure out if there's scum motivation for voting him, he just immediately went "yeah ok". How is that not implicitly assuming the wagon is pure?
When you put it that way, it does track actually; after all, clearly nobody would ever see a wagon on themselves and just think that's a nai thing on the voters' side, right?
In post 89, heipizhu4 wrote:
I have a feeling I got wagoned whenever I tried to push the game out of rvs as town ...
Oh, oh, wait, what's this? Is this heip aknowledging they get wagoned every time they do a thing? And so there need not be a specific ai motivation for such a wagon to form? Well then.
In post 89, heipizhu4 wrote:
I have a feeling I got wagoned whenever I tried to push the game out of rvs as town ...
Oh, oh, wait, what's this? Is this heip aknowledging they get wagoned every time they do a thing? And so there need not be a specific ai motivation for such a wagon to form? Well then.
Is it town that wagons him or scum? Do scum hop on the wagon or go bat for him? Like wtf is this level 0 read no shit wagons are AI
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
They were mellow and didnt do assertions as scum they basically spent a lot of time idling townreafing town last game I played with them
(1 game reference)
Plus when pushed they didn't really react to
us at all just ignored the pressure
Like all of biancos town!heip theories are like alternate explanation stuff that'd come to mind if you start from the position that heip is town and then run the mindset from there
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
I thought help was getting dog piled for nothing (he is) but going "Whenever I try to push the game forward I get suspected" is something scum does as in its basically manipulating to not vote them. I feel bad
Or that could just be how heip feels. Never played with heip
