In post 175, Alisae wrote:
is yessire a villlager for wanting to go against no-elimination?
I have no real idea.
I can see a townie who wants a lim to provide potential VCA.
I can also see scum who realises that Ari's strategy is bound to force scum into pairing in the swing phase while minimising the amount of scummy players to hide behind.
IMO, if they think Cakez/Klick could be aligned, wouldn't it be better to get them to pair together or force them to not get paired?
Because that way, both their SRs are dead in a single shot.
Aristeia I went into this thinking you weren't that interested in understanding my thought process and were more interested in pushing something you didn't immediately understand
I think you're town but your recent posting reaffirms that for me
Which is why I'm not really engaging with your main point
In post 176, RH9 wrote:
IMO, if they think Cakez/Klick could be aligned, wouldn't it be better to get them to pair together or force them to not get paired?
Because that way, both their SRs are dead in a single shot.
In post 178, Klick wrote:
Aristeia I went into this thinking you weren't that interested in understanding my thought process and were more interested in pushing something you didn't immediately understand
I think you're town but your recent posting reaffirms that for me
Which is why I'm not really engaging with your main point
I asked you why you thought I was scummy af
you spent an entire day coming up with answers and now you claim it was because you were just joking
In post 178, Klick wrote:
Aristeia I went into this thinking you weren't that interested in understanding my thought process and were more interested in pushing something you didn't immediately understand
I think you're town but your recent posting reaffirms that for me
Which is why I'm not really engaging with your main point
I asked you why you thought I was scummy af
you spent an entire day coming up with answers and now you claim it was because you were just joking
You spent and are continuing to spend this entire day suicide tunnelling a slot that you have openly stated you just don't have the patience for
Cakez in thread comes across as agendy and weird and I spent a lot of time playing and trying understand the guy and I think what he's put in thread so far is weird.
Don't like any RH9 posts.
I don't rly know what wolf!Ari looks like but im not rly sure what kind of "real thought" Ari expects you to have?
And I don't think anything you've done in the first 5 pages can truly be ruled out yet. I think it's not rly helpful if I hyperfocus on you and ari fight so I wanted to cakez and rh9 first and give both of you the time to play and be more readable
I think Ari cares about her tunnel way more than she would as scum
Cakez feels a lot more confident and free-flowing than I remember seeing him as scum
RH9 is actively not trying to persuade me that he is town in PT
In post 178, Klick wrote:
Aristeia I went into this thinking you weren't that interested in understanding my thought process and were more interested in pushing something you didn't immediately understand
I think you're town but your recent posting reaffirms that for me
Which is why I'm not really engaging with your main point
I asked you why you thought I was scummy af
you spent an entire day coming up with answers and now you claim it was because you were just joking
You spent and are continuing to spend this entire day suicide tunnelling a slot that you have openly stated you just don't have the patience for
I asked pretty nicely at the beginning
claiming I don't have the patience for you is kind of disingenuous.
Disagree on cakez, I think it's really easy for a player like Cakez to improve after playing a hydra or two w/ him.
I could see that on Ari ig? Ari isn't rly a concern for me right now I think I'm more interested in other slots that aren't you and ari over you and ari
we've played for a little over twenty four hours. I think it's telling what everyone thinks of our conflict and who is for this plan where we dance together.
claiming that I am only interested in a tunnel on you is not even remotely true.
In post 194, Aristeia wrote:
we've played for a little over twenty four hours. I think it's telling what everyone thinks of our conflict and who is for this plan where we dance together.
claiming that I am only interested in a tunnel on you is not even remotely true.
would it be possible for you to forget about Klick for the next 24-48 hours?
do u have a particular reason why you don't want to no eliminate?
I think the fact we can rig the pairings up so that we force the 2 people we dislike the most to die I think is pretty strong
I think we should get actual good opinions and then talk about getting two eliminations instead of one
I think the swinger mechanic played naturally will give us more information early than controlling it by majority
