In post 162, Black wrote:
What can be taken away from this mala proposal? I think it suggests that either I'm town or we are scum together. Mala could be town or scum regardless of my alignment. I think scum is more likely to try and toss out a trust fall to something they think might accept, but it is mala we're talking about here so personality has to be considered
I think the only reason scum doesn't accept a trust fall right away is if they think they can influence the game by staying in it. So I'm not cleared by any means. I could definitely do this as scum
I feel like convincing others of your townyness, as mafia when you've the option to leave instead, in order to manipulate the game more in your favor would be such a hassle; I know I wouldn't.
If Mala exited with someone else and flipped green, I feel like I'd wager Black to be green.
Even though I enjoy playing as scum, I like winning more. I don't think I would risk staying in the game and doing something scummy to the extent that the trust offer is rescinded. But this is wifom so I don't expect people to take my word for it
In post 95, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
If I was Mafia and someone "confirmed" me town by trusting me, I'd use it as a leverage to try and get a good towny out of the game with me so that it's easier for my ally
In post 179, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
I feel like convincing others of your townyness, as mafia when you've the option to leave instead, in order to manipulate the game more in your favor would be such a hassle; I know I wouldn't.
I find it interesting how important to me is the distinction between the 2
In post 95, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
If I was Mafia and someone "confirmed" me town by trusting me, I'd use it as a leverage to try and get a good towny out of the game with me so that it's easier for my ally
In post 179, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
I feel like convincing others of your townyness, as mafia when you've the option to leave instead, in order to manipulate the game more in your favor would be such a hassle; I know I wouldn't.
I find it interesting how important to me is the distinction between the 2
In post 95, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
If I was Mafia and someone "confirmed" me town by trusting me, I'd use it as a leverage to try and get a good towny out of the game with me so that it's easier for my ally
In post 179, Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
I feel like convincing others of your townyness, as mafia when you've the option to leave instead, in order to manipulate the game more in your favor would be such a hassle; I know I wouldn't.
I find it interesting how important to me is the distinction between the 2
I don't believe that's a possibility in this setup?
I know I read it years ago, and on a different site, but I'm pretty sure that wasn't an option
Otherwise I imagine Trust Fall setups would be full of bait Trusts between simultaneously online players
"A player can only have one trust offer active at a given time. If a player makes a new offer of trust to someone else, their previous offer is automatically rescinded."
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 186, Black wrote:
"A player can only have one trust offer active at a given time. If a player makes a new offer of trust to someone else, their previous offer is automatically rescinded."
Ok, that's news to me.
The previous time I played this setup I lost the game by doing this:
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
