In post 158, Aisa wrote:
I wasn't asking you to go through all this effort! but neat that you did anyway. I was just curious why you decided to sheep Enchant on a whim like that. How serious was it (eugghh I said it) and do you have an actual unironic read on Kitty?
It was not very serious, I just thought it was a fun idea to sheep them after that game and I didn't have a better scumread at that point.
In post 139, biancospino wrote:
I love how this fails to disambiguate the exact two things it should be disambiguating
⬇
⬇
⬇
⬇
Based on this, Thinking face is more suspicious than smiley face.
I never said it was the most groundbreaking logic of all time. Also, how am I supposed to know you said Enchant is good at reading you is /s. I've never played with either of you, just taking what you said as truth I suppose. The logic was purely me taking as fact that apparently Enchant is good at reading you (your own apparently sarcastic words) and I interpreted their reads as they are suspicious of you. Was enough for me to at least get some discussion going. I'm not saying I'm ready to elim you right away.
In post 160, Aisa wrote:
Doc! I feel like we keep crossing paths for really brief periods of time
Re: Dragon sheeping Enchant, I don't understand:
- If there's anything to Enchant's vote beside "Kitty claimed jester and I didn't like that"
- What DragonEater "saw" as the reasoning behind Enchant's vote
- If Dragon is being serious
Do you have a take on any of these things?
Okay let me clarify:
I do not have a serious scumread on Kitty. I think his posts were not very spectacular when I voted him, but it was a semi-RVS vote (or more like 75% RVS).
If I'm being fully honest, I also don't really know what I saw. I guess that maybe as an "RVS-read" I thought that Kitty was trying to avoid engagement and pocket NM? Not sure.
In post 183, biancospino wrote:
Dragon, I'm perceiving you as significantly more agressive this game for some reason. Maybe it's just the new avatar
Could be
Also I've been recently trying to play differently because it just hurts to be right about who is scum and then let other people sway you into other wagons and then get nightkilled without ever limming the person you suspected as scum (like recently happened to me on Veiled Committee Mafia). So I figured if I try to be more aggressive or self confident or whatever, it might work better. So far the results are mixed.
In post 160, Aisa wrote:
Doc! I feel like we keep crossing paths for really brief periods of time
Re: Dragon sheeping Enchant, I don't understand:
- If there's anything to Enchant's vote beside "Kitty claimed jester and I didn't like that"
- What DragonEater "saw" as the reasoning behind Enchant's vote
- If Dragon is being serious
Do you have a take on any of these things?
Okay let me clarify:
I do not have a serious scumread on Kitty. I think his posts were not very spectacular when I voted him, but it was a semi-RVS vote (or more like 75% RVS).
If I'm being fully honest, I also don't really know what I saw. I guess that maybe as an "RVS-read" I thought that Kitty was trying to avoid engagement and pocket NM? Not sure.
I am more weary about what Dragon was trying to pull saying I slipped
And Dragon, seems a bit nasty to say someone is trying to avoid engagement in rvs, no?
'dREW DID IT BETTER' - T-Bone
'doctor drew our hero' - Shiki
'I love playing with him, he's got an amazing presence to him that just feels like the game is lacking something when he's not there' - JacksonVirgo
*hasty not nasty, though maybe is a bit nasty as well lol
'dREW DID IT BETTER' - T-Bone
'doctor drew our hero' - Shiki
'I love playing with him, he's got an amazing presence to him that just feels like the game is lacking something when he's not there' - JacksonVirgo
Well you’re assuming all content can generate a read. Which isn’t the case.
Aureal slamming the policy vote seemed townie to me and no one else did a townie thing. Enchant is townie for the emoji thing and a byproduct of celebs posting but emojis can only take him so far so that’s more of a quicksand read.
In post 193, RCEnigma wrote:
Aureal slamming the policy vote seemed townie to me and no one else did a townie thing. Enchant is townie for the emoji thing and a byproduct of celebs posting but emojis can only take him so far so that’s more of a quicksand read.
why assume Aureal policy voting you is a real thing that could warrant a read and not just some RVS shtick?
When i open this game, and starting read, i immediatly close it because i starting strongly consider self last townie alive and others are just jesters.
When i open this game, and starting read, i immediatly close it because i starting strongly consider self last townie alive and others are just jesters.
When i open this game, and starting read, i immediatly close it because i starting strongly consider self last townie alive and others are just jesters.
or even 