LOL I get you
Yeah. Let me preface it though with the fact that I correctly scumread Ircher in both DEFCON 6 and Veiled Committee Mafia, and maybe I'm a bit biased because I don't think I've seen him play town recently, but I do think that makes me pretty good at finding scum!him.
Anyway, the first few posts in his ISO (specifically,
25 and
27, maybe also
39 and
41 but less so) feel like "content for the sake of content", something he's just posting so as not to be seen as lurking.
Post
49 is a scummy reaction to the mason claim. It doesn't look so bad in isolation, but compare it to
48,
50 and
53 and you see Ircher standing out as the only one who didn't get the joke. And not reacting properly to a joke is scummy, because scum are VERY self conscious early on and especially in regards to joke. Ircher's reaction makes more sense from a scumplayer overthinking what my post means than a town player who just reacts naturally. ( I'll add an additional disclaimer that some of these thoughts are occurring to me as I write, but it doesn't mean that I'm making it up - I simply had these feelings on a gut level before that and now I'm processing them.)
Then, his vote on me (currently his only voiced read in the game since he's gone MIA since then) just feels bad. I think town!Ircher has better reads than this and wouldn't just randomly OMGUS a broccoli that puts a half random vote on him. Scum!Ircher on the other hand is known (at least to me, and you can verify it by reading Veiled Committee Mafia) for having bad/baseless votes early on.
