In post 1497, Roden wrote: Cakez doing exactly what I said he would do if he were converted is, not particularly surprising
if people want to do a Cakez run we could do it tomorrow or if Dan flips red but not before; I have reasonz for this thx
In post 1497, Roden wrote: Cakez doing exactly what I said he would do if he were converted is, not particularly surprising
In post 951, Titus wrote: Two of Emerson, Blair and Nova can be trusted.
just combining both of these btwIn post 1425, Titus wrote: My names are Blair, Dakota and Nova
Just want to point out that there is no tomorrow if town gets mis-elim'd again and scum have three successful conversions.In post 1500, Maestro wrote:In post 1497, Roden wrote: Cakez doing exactly what I said he would do if he were converted is, not particularly surprising
if people want to do a Cakez run we could do it tomorrow or if Dan flips red but not before; I have reasonz for this thx
In post 1499, Maestro wrote: but yeah I think Drew is more town than you by far, if thats' what yuou mean? should be obvious
what does chainsaw mean again? been aqwhile since igaf about Maf terms
We're at 12 players, Day 3In post 1504, Maestro wrote: uh no? unless my math is wrong
I don't think we've even interacted up until nowIn post 1507, Maestro wrote: Roden LMAO I have not loved your play all game so (a) does not apply to me, and (b) is a very silly reason to call somebody scum independent of (a) but nice try, keep firin' off into the dark there, bruhther, bound to hit shit eventually
It would be 6-6 i thinkIn post 1508, Roden wrote:We're at 12 players, Day 3In post 1504, Maestro wrote: uh no? unless my math is wrong
3 scum still live, and have had two chances to recruit
Worst case scenario, 5 scum (3 group, 2 converts) currently exist vs 7 town
Mis-elim + successful conversion means 6 scum vs 5 town on Day 4, which is a town loss
Another reason why we should've kept the 3p around, but no point crying over spilt milk at this point
I wasn't sure if this needed to be said, but the worst case scenario is the biggest reason I'm even putting out my suspicions on who I think is converted. We need to hit group scum today and avoid converts, because even if we hit a convert we would still make zero progress since there's a good chance they just get replaced with another convert and Day 4 is still ELO. It's why I have no intention of voting Titus or Cakez.In post 1509, Maestro wrote: I didn't have much influence on the 3p, yeah, but ok ig that math checks out?
First Day 2 vote and the earliest he could've been converted. It looks like he's hiding behind a town!Dan.
This spews Leaf as not group scum imo.In post 1405, SirCakez wrote: VOTE: flavor leaf that quickhammer was trash IDC about role claims for now
This feels like scum trying to pocket town with hard town reads. Slightly less inclined to think Drew/Maestro are a thing. Not impossible for Cakez to pair up a town with a group scum though.In post 1406, SirCakez wrote: Dan and Maestro's postings in the PT have felt very town. Hell even Maestro pointed out I was coasting in there compared to them so I'm inclined to townread both for now.
In post 1409, SirCakez wrote: Drew reads pretty town in game and in the pt
I probably want to eliminate Aureal or Bianco today. Maybe Roden or Theta??
FL is probably town but I really feel like that quickhammer was a gambit play he'd make as scum so I'm not writing him off
Drew suspiciously missing after he just said he was town.In post 1411, SirCakez wrote: Yes I wouldn't eliminate FL today, but I'm definitely not putting him in my safe town reads, which would be Dan, Maestro, Titus and Thomith
Considering this vote didn't stick, this unfortunately might have been distancing...
More hardcore white knighting.In post 1437, SirCakez wrote: Dan isn't scummy at all why would we eliminate him today
Literally repeating the exact same argument Drew made.In post 1488, SirCakez wrote:This is backpedaling you said that you thought Titus and I were covered to cult because of activity changes. How is that not saying we are scummy?In post 1469, Roden wrote: That's because I'm not...
VOTE: roden