In post 248, SzmarzLeek wrote:
but overall, I think Nora is sus
sole fact that I had to ask three times to get a proper answer, makes me think she really made a scummy post and wanted to dismiss the matter
we should've gotten that answer during my first push on that post
Oh you can NOT be for real right now... x_x Yes, you asked the question three times but I responded all three ways in the exact same way. I never dodged the question or gave a dismissive response
Here's my response to the first time you asked:
In post 171, Nora. wrote:
In post 160, SzmarzLeek wrote:
that's a very naive thought to make
I don't like that you had this thought
scumreading me is fine, but pointing at partnership so early seems sus to me, especially based on such situation
I think you rather stay quiet/slight sus about your partner in a 2-scum game
...well this might be my inexperience with long form forum mafia showing. I usually start looking for connections early.
This is a complete answer. Here's my most recent response to the same question when you kept repeating it:
In post 232, Nora. wrote:
why do you keep beating the dead horse? x_x I've already explained my playstyle is contingent on fast-paced games where even in 24 hr Days we usually hammer within a few hours. Obviously there will be a difference in approaches but I think I am adapting well?
Those two responses by me. Are the exact same. I just elaborated in the latter. Surely you see that. xD
VOTE: SzmarzLeek
Your treatment of me aside, I don't like the rest of your 'process' either:
In post 247, SzmarzLeek wrote:
and after some consideration, NotAScum might be scum too
he's posting stuff that would be suicidal for scum, that's true
but I really struggle to find a towny thought process between "let's look for scum in actives" to "inactivity is scummy"
you can change your mind based on someone's posts but changing the way you look for scum in 24 hours? we're getting too farfetched there imo
hedgy read and says nothing
In post 248, SzmarzLeek wrote:
but overall, I think Nora is sus
sole fact that I had to ask three times to get a proper answer, makes me think she really made a scummy post and wanted to dismiss the matter
we should've gotten that answer during my first push on that post
I've already explained why this makes no sense to me x_x
In post 249, SzmarzLeek wrote:
Aureal is playing bad for both town and scum
she's a decent town, I played with her a bit, guess her scum game wouldn't be as bad as it is here, too?
I don't like the approach to just come into the thread and sus your opponent though
but I think she deserves another day
hedge again, says basically nothing
In post 250, SzmarzLeek wrote:
Bella's lim imo is 75% chance of a miss, I would say 3 out of 4 times people who don't give a damn are town
Don't understand the confidence here. I'd be interested to hear what the new replacement thinks of this stance @Doctor Drew (someone please help me figure out how pings work xD) - from your point of view, do you think your slot had done anything worth the confidence above? I personally find it hard to believe SzmarzLeek hasn't come across slanking scum and rwstfo driven players before. Slanking players are >rand in terms of alignment imo...and meta reads on specific players can skew those chances one way or another.
In post 252, SzmarzLeek wrote:
as for Bingle, they're kinda positioned in the middle of the thread, which is a comfortable spot for scum (not a low hanging fruit, not into leadership), but could also be a NAI for players who generally perform such plastyle in both factions
Again, a hedgy read that commits to nothing
Your posts on everybody (with the exception of myself >.>) sound like commentary from a spectator rather than opinions coming from a player... It's like youre aggressively trying to present objective-sounding takes