In post 72, ketchup777 wrote:
I don’t think it was a lie, I believe it was an accident. I just think the accident is more likely to come from maf doing a half-hearted job of scumhunting than an awesomely excited very eager to catch all of the mafia townie (hi you’re going down mafalafs)
why do you think town are *less* likely to make accidents and slips? considering that we are the uninformed faction? (i am aware this is kinda the opposite question of the one I asked black, but humour me)
because we can go with our true feelings and our mind will pick up from where it left off probably whereas (I imagine, haven't got to try it yet) mafia can easily slip up over who they had decided to fake suspicions on
I did not expect the first Drew post of the game to come from someone else besides me lol
Town points for Ketchup, but will need Python for a proper analysis
(And ftr, for me personally I make sure my ducks are all in a row more as scum than town.......so Ketchup, I think you are looking at something NAI)
Drewpoints can only be redeemed by registered Drewidians, not sure if ketchup qualifies
We actually wouldn't give townpoints here simply cause we're associating this read with having an underdeveloped understanding of how scum act which wouldn't really change based on what PM they got
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
In post 897, Laplacian wrote:
@Political Clout the only reasons for your L_G vote seem to be from page 9. Was there anything else there that you didn't elaborate on?
They seem to not really be playing the game. They ask questions but don't pursue the end of the thought imo and fail to sort people. The backed off blacks tr on me when black pushed back they backed off their black/jv theory when jv responded. Feels performative.
In post 816, usesPython wrote:Like just the read percolating or did something in specific make you realize it
Hu Tao was in the conversation, the post which pinged as +town was the bottom of the last page, and when I realized I hadn't properly bumped Hu Tao up, I remedied the mistake.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 804, usesPython wrote:It'd be really funny if everyone disappeared over the weekend so that we spend the entire phase active when no one else is on
This was a joke not an invitation
V/LA this weekend /hj
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 918, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Reading my ISO like you said you're doing would answer both of those
I want to hear it from you.
Not interested in repeating myself for the sake of repeating myself
your explanation didn't really make sense to me.
In post 592, JacksonVirgo wrote:
They don't seem to be deflecting because of my push, the push is seemingly absolutely meaningless to him but instead he's trying to get me to be more productive in a way that they seem to truly think that scum-reading them is useless/meaningless and they want to actually do something to progress the game. I don't know how to put this into words properly
They're not 'deflecting because of the push,' 'push is meaningless,' 'trying to get me to be more productive,' 'scum reading them is useless,' 'want to do something to progress the game'.
Wouldn't scum want you to think that scum reading them is useless? or are they doing it in a unique way or a towny way? I'm not sure I follow.
In post 836, ketchup777 wrote:you seem pretty competent to me, and using these reads lists must be a familiar enough format for you that you’ve generated some ideas on how to best manipulate them as scum. I’m sure you would know how to do something like what I suggested
Oh certainly. I'm capable of it.
I tend to be given credit I don't deserve, and lack it when it's warranted.
In post 836, ketchup777 wrote:It feels very unbacked up/ shovelling it all onto vibes
Unless otherwise stated, all reads are vibes. I can certainly try to explain a vibe in many cases, yet the only reasons to are if I'm trying to convince someone or trying to demonstrate my thoughts to help them read me. I've a need for neither yet.
In post 836, ketchup777 wrote:and very convenient in being able to take the read 1 way or the other depending on what best suits you at the time. Methinks.[/color]Being too rigid in reads is a disease. Of course I'm flexible in which way I take my reads. There's good reason I usually don't label them with varying degrees of town/null/scum; those are tools which have a time, yet are not the solution for every situation.
