koba making this joke in a way that lets people laugh it off as a joke but would get a miller to say something feels kinda bad
why would mafia benefit from knowing who's a miller? if i understand correctly, something like 'miller gunsmith' is possible? or is miller a role not a modifier
This is a setup where
is a realistic possibility that scum have to play around. In that example not claiming miller would be a pretty big scumclaim that scum could easily walk into
why are we doing day one setup speculation on the basis of one miller claim
like if theres something I'm missing here pls do tell
monkey pattern seeking brain gets dopamine on establishing pattern that make them think they win, neuron activated.
basically lol
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
im kinda feeling titus might be town so maybe arko has to be mafia here
thought i said this but yeah
im notoriously bad at reading titus esp early game so please dont even sheep me on anything i said about her if i die early on
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
i have cheated by delegating my read to someone i perceive as better at reading her than me in the past but i dont see that cheat here so im like uhh fuck it poe
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
i am willing to put full null players into the PoE if theres enough players i feel confident calling town basically lol
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
Every post is a regression to the mean. She goes to defend people as soon as anyone posts a scumread, pushing against them as if they don't want any scum to be found. No strong reads or votes. Even L_G voting for me isn't "Lap is scum," it's "lets see where this goes".
I love getting scumread for asking questions to other players about their reads, in a game of social deduction
and just for reference
"lets see where this goes" = I'm voting you because I want to see how you respond to help me sort you
and you've responded with a delayed OMGUS vote on the other top wagon
usesPython: great catch in 813. I can't see scum cross-referencing lists & pages like that.
ketchup: while I don't agree with their reads, they're actively trying to scumhunt and think
drew: good logic, I like how he argued with both usesPython and JV
neutral:
HT: i said they were towny earlier, but that dropped back to neutral after mischaracterizng me in JOAT.
JacksonVirgo: frustation over tunneling chat seems genuine. But I can't tell is frustration is from not wanting to admit tunnel or scum mad that their pushed collapsed. good taste in gifs tho
DkKoba: miller claim, ignore until d3 unless something super scummy happens
scummy:
Ranger: still dont like dem magic lists. Super easy to fake the progression to just coast along with prevailing opinions while looking like you're scumhunting
light_ganski: see 827
Everyone else either has low posts or I'm having trouble reading still.
where am I here?
You're in the "Everyone else either has low posts or
I'm having trouble reading still
". Was the main reason I asked about your LG vote, since I wanted to see the thought process and try to get you more
you arent related with arko but he replaced you in my tentative solve because i forgot he existed as a non posting entity. (hard to believe but i definitely thought he posted due to a dream i had lol)
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
i feel like u either feel 1 way or the other about a player like him from my 1 game sample with him
doesnt seem like a very "huh " inducing player to me
then again its boring but my first conclusion is that that happens bc you are scum and i already had you as scum so yeah lol
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
Arko = scum theory makes a lot of sense to me. Since I was at E-2 and hanging out at the bottom of most peoples lists, scum could have easily pushed me to E-1 and/or hammered pretty safely
usesPython: great catch in 813. I can't see scum cross-referencing lists & pages like that.
ketchup: while I don't agree with their reads, they're actively trying to scumhunt and think
drew: good logic, I like how he argued with both usesPython and JV
neutral:
HT: i said they were towny earlier, but that dropped back to neutral after mischaracterizng me in JOAT.
JacksonVirgo: frustation over tunneling chat seems genuine. But I can't tell is frustration is from not wanting to admit tunnel or scum mad that their pushed collapsed. good taste in gifs tho
DkKoba: miller claim, ignore until d3 unless something super scummy happens
scummy:
Ranger: still dont like dem magic lists. Super easy to fake the progression to just coast along with prevailing opinions while looking like you're scumhunting
light_ganski: see 827
Everyone else either has low posts or I'm having trouble reading still.
where am I here?
You're in the "Everyone else either has low posts or
I'm having trouble reading still
". Was the main reason I asked about your LG vote, since I wanted to see the thought process and try to get you more
usesPython: great catch in 813. I can't see scum cross-referencing lists & pages like that.
ketchup: while I don't agree with their reads, they're actively trying to scumhunt and think
drew: good logic, I like how he argued with both usesPython and JV
neutral:
HT: i said they were towny earlier, but that dropped back to neutral after mischaracterizng me in JOAT.
JacksonVirgo: frustation over tunneling chat seems genuine. But I can't tell is frustration is from not wanting to admit tunnel or scum mad that their pushed collapsed. good taste in gifs tho
DkKoba: miller claim, ignore until d3 unless something super scummy happens
scummy:
Ranger: still dont like dem magic lists. Super easy to fake the progression to just coast along with prevailing opinions while looking like you're scumhunting
light_ganski: see 827
Everyone else either has low posts or I'm having trouble reading still.
you say "reads list time" but this is barely even a reads list. you've only actually sorted 5 out of 13 players, you're town reading someone because "you can't see scum referencing" (something I regularly do as scum, and I'm a lazy scum player ffs) and your reason for SRing one of them is that... you don't like reads lists... that she's known to make in every game as both alignments. this whole post reeks of "look at me, I'm being productive" whilst barely saying anything of substance.
plus you put more than a third of the players you bother to list in neutral, after scum reading me because i'm apparently hedging
i feel like u either feel 1 way or the other about a player like him from my 1 game sample with him
doesnt seem like a very "huh " inducing player to me
then again its boring but my first conclusion is that that happens bc you are scum and i already had you as scum so yeah lol
Haven't played with PC before, nothing as of that list was screaming town or scum either way to me. Reading them as town now though after their last batch of posts.
usesPython: great catch in 813. I can't see scum cross-referencing lists & pages like that.
ketchup: while I don't agree with their reads, they're actively trying to scumhunt and think
drew: good logic, I like how he argued with both usesPython and JV
neutral:
HT: i said they were towny earlier, but that dropped back to neutral after mischaracterizng me in JOAT.
JacksonVirgo: frustation over tunneling chat seems genuine. But I can't tell is frustration is from not wanting to admit tunnel or scum mad that their pushed collapsed. good taste in gifs tho
DkKoba: miller claim, ignore until d3 unless something super scummy happens
scummy:
Ranger: still dont like dem magic lists. Super easy to fake the progression to just coast along with prevailing opinions while looking like you're scumhunting
light_ganski: see 827
Everyone else either has low posts or I'm having trouble reading still.
you say "reads list time" but this is barely even a reads list. you've only actually sorted 5 out of 13 players, you're town reading someone because "you can't see scum referencing" (something I regularly do as scum, and I'm a lazy scum player ffs) and your reason for SRing one of them is that... you don't like reads lists... that she's known to make in every game as both alignments. this whole post reeks of "look at me, I'm being productive" whilst barely saying anything of substance.
plus you put more than a third of the players you bother to list in neutral, after scum reading me because i'm apparently hedging
Congrats, you're a few hours late to the ranger's meta discussion and moving JV up to townlean after talking with him.
Every post is a regression to the mean. She goes to defend people as soon as anyone posts a scumread, pushing against them as if they don't want any scum to be found. No strong reads or votes. Even L_G voting for me isn't "Lap is scum," it's "lets see where this goes".
This feels like more of a panic vote at being at E-2 and having another wagon opportunity rather than a genuine belief Light is scum
I would have accepted it slipped my mind. I forgor oopsie. if you're having trouble reading me why am I not in the neutral bin as I assume that is what it's there for.
it's okay i get it, playing to your win condition and all that <3
OMG WHAT IF THIS ISNT A LOVEHEART BUT IS ACTUALLY A LESS THAN 3; LIGHT IS HINTING THAT SHE KNOWS THERE ARE LESS THAN 3 MAFIA WHO KNOW EACH OTHERS IDENTITY
noooooooooo you've uncovered my secret scum plot </3
In post 993, Political Clout wrote:
I would have accepted it slipped my mind. I forgor oopsie. if you're having trouble reading me why am I not in the neutral bin as I assume that is what it's there for.
I treat neutral as "I have thought about them a bunch but I'm still not sure what's going on" or "you did something towny but then you did something scummy and they've cancelled out". DkKoba's in neutral because miller claim. HT had town vibes and then mischaracterized stuff hard. Neutral to me is "there's some shit going on with them, but I'm not sure how to resolve it yet", not no information. Tossing people in neutral because I haven't found anything interesting to discuss yet is just a waste of space
usesPython: great catch in 813. I can't see scum cross-referencing lists & pages like that.
ketchup: while I don't agree with their reads, they're actively trying to scumhunt and think
drew: good logic, I like how he argued with both usesPython and JV
neutral:
HT: i said they were towny earlier, but that dropped back to neutral after mischaracterizng me in JOAT.
JacksonVirgo: frustation over tunneling chat seems genuine. But I can't tell is frustration is from not wanting to admit tunnel or scum mad that their pushed collapsed. good taste in gifs tho
DkKoba: miller claim, ignore until d3 unless something super scummy happens
scummy:
Ranger: still dont like dem magic lists. Super easy to fake the progression to just coast along with prevailing opinions while looking like you're scumhunting
light_ganski: see 827
Everyone else either has low posts or I'm having trouble reading still.
Why do you feel the need to specify your agreement with ketchup when the read has nothing to do with that.
How much of a gap is between ganski and ranger
he needs add a bunch of extraneous information to make the list look like it actually contains any original thought on most of the players in it, that's why
In post 993, Political Clout wrote:
I would have accepted it slipped my mind. I forgor oopsie. if you're having trouble reading me why am I not in the neutral bin as I assume that is what it's there for.
I treat neutral as "I have thought about them a bunch but I'm still not sure what's going on" or "you did something towny but then you did something scummy and they've cancelled out". DkKoba's in neutral because miller claim. HT had town vibes and then mischaracterized stuff hard. Neutral to me is "there's some shit going on with them, but I'm not sure how to resolve it yet", not no information. Tossing people in neutral because I haven't found anything interesting to discuss yet is just a waste of space
you should have done your homework and counted my posts I only had 27 when you posted your reads list so I also would have accepted your first reason that I hadn't posted enough. I believe you less now.
In post 989, light_ganski wrote:
you say "reads list time" but this is barely even a reads list. you've only actually sorted 5 out of 13 players, you're town reading someone because "you can't see scum referencing" (something I regularly do as scum, and I'm a lazy scum player ffs) and your reason for SRing one of them is that... you don't like reads lists... that she's known to make in every game as both alignments. this whole post reeks of "look at me, I'm being productive" whilst barely saying anything of substance.
plus you put more than a third of the players you bother to list in neutral, after scum reading me because i'm apparently hedging
Congrats, you're a few hours late to the ranger's meta discussion and moving JV up to townlean after talking with him.
and this makes you seem less scummy how, precisely?
lap is at e-2, intent to hammer if they get to e-1
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
