You said you weren't in a position to play traditionally near the start of the game, not that you're choosing not to play traditionally because it hasn't gotten results.
In post 744, Yuuka Kazami wrote:
They say they're not in a position to push players traditionally, but pretty much, nothing is indicating that this is the case.
They're here, they're active, they're relatively cogent, and their opinions and points are not insane.
They can push whenever they want, they've chosen not to.
Y-y-you really think my opinions and points are not insane?
And yeah look whatever confidence issues, i don't trust i'd be able to bring it home by playing normally so i'm doing it like that regardless
I don't think that you have the thread presence to materialize a wagon on any of the people that you listed in your "high charisma players" list, but I feel like you could reasonably make a push happen on other players.
But your votes so far have not felt like they have actually come with any real attempt to get people to follow you.
But you are also outwardly saying that you are not trying to lead people this game, so :shrug:
In post 737, Yuuka Kazami wrote:
You could've scrutinized them whenever you wanted, you don't seem to have an issue getting in people's way.
Why not tenshi who is generally trying to put themselves out there?
i'm sorry but i don'r get what you're saying here
You could've scrutinized or gotten in their way like you've gotten in my or clown's way, but you haven't. Tenshi seems very willing, almost ethically constrained to respond to people. They "owe" people responses, they don't leave people hanging and say as much.
I don't feel like your play makes sense.
Yeah exactly, i think that's scummy
it's a passive observation, one that you've chosen not to try to clarify. Why can't you be scum happy to just let Tenshi sit there, being slightly scummy instead of interrogating them where their response might change how people generally view them? For good or ill.
In post 744, Yuuka Kazami wrote:
They say they're not in a position to push players traditionally, but pretty much, nothing is indicating that this is the case.
They're here, they're active, they're relatively cogent, and their opinions and points are not insane.
They can push whenever they want, they've chosen not to.
Y-y-you really think my opinions and points are not insane?
And yeah look whatever confidence issues, i don't trust i'd be able to bring it home by playing normally so i'm doing it like that regardless
I don't think that you have the thread presence to materialize a wagon on any of the people that you listed in your "high charisma players" list, but I feel like you could reasonably make a push happen on other players.
But your votes so far have not felt like they have actually come with any real attempt to get people to follow you.
But you are also outwardly saying that you are not trying to lead people this game, so :shrug:
Well, look i think i know myself and my capabilities better than you do right? Especially since we're in anon format
this is also a problem of i hoped to find other townies pushing wagons i like but so far everything is just icky so that doesn't help
In post 757, Yuuka Kazami wrote:
Why would you think that this would be the case, when there's simply no way your posts aren't designed to be at least slightly vexing?
Do you remember your "Tee-Hee" response?
The best you're gunna get from that is neutrality.
In post 757, Yuuka Kazami wrote:
Why would you think that this would be the case, when there's simply no way your posts aren't designed to be at least slightly vexing?
Do you remember your "Tee-Hee" response?
The best you're gunna get from that is neutrality.
i think you're taking things too seriously
I enjoy this kind of thing, tbh. I like playing games earnestly. Or that's how I prefer to frame it anyway.
In post 761, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
Well, look i think i know myself and my capabilities better than you do right? Especially since we're in anon format
I'm just saying that you have an approach and posting style that I gravitate towards, and I actually think that if your most verbose scum case was against someone other then me, I might be inclined to follow you.
In post 761, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
Well, look i think i know myself and my capabilities better than you do right? Especially since we're in anon format
I'm just saying that you have an approach and posting style that I gravitate towards, and I actually think that if your most verbose scum case was against someone other then me, I might be inclined to follow you.
Maybe tommorow i'll be in a scumcasing mood, can't promise anything
In post 761, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
Well, look i think i know myself and my capabilities better than you do right? Especially since we're in anon format
I'm just saying that you have an approach and posting style that I gravitate towards, and I actually think that if your most verbose scum case was against someone other then me, I might be inclined to follow you.
Maybe tommorow i'll be in a scumcasing mood, can't promise anything
Okay, just promise you wont come back with another clownpiece scum case, because I still cant follow you on that one
In post 261, Koishi Komeiji wrote:
I like making unexplained vote changes to momentumize wagons on people that I don't town-read because action creates reaction.
Scum don't fear a town that has their own pet scumreads and are siloed off from each other - scum fear unpredictability and speed.
Fair enough, but my main question is still about Larva. What was she cooking?
In post 264, Ichirin Kumoi wrote:
The haters can say my posting sucks but I will not accept dying until I have the answer to that.
In post 289, Clownpiece wrote:
It kind of comes across like you already knows that all three of us are town, so your goal is not to sort us, and your actual goal in this situation is just to change our mind by finding something to talk about/focus on (in this case Eternity Larva) to "show" that you are solving.
I literally got assaulted by 3 votes mid-catchup, so.
Assaulted?
Assaulted.
This feels like a very blase response to getting wagoned. Someone (Clown?) said it was scummy that sie was focused on Larva while getting wagoned, but reading it through in sequence again - I don't think that's what scum chooses to focus on while responding to hir wagon. Sie's pretty tongue-in-cheek about it, and aware that it might not look so good
In post 761, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
Well, look i think i know myself and my capabilities better than you do right? Especially since we're in anon format
I'm just saying that you have an approach and posting style that I gravitate towards, and I actually think that if your most verbose scum case was against someone other then me, I might be inclined to follow you.
Maybe tommorow i'll be in a scumcasing mood, can't promise anything
Okay, just promise you wont come back with another clownpiece scum case, because I still cant follow you on that one
Truth is i'm secretly rolling a dice in my notes PT before i take any stance in the thread so you've got a 12/13 chance
I’m not sure they are enough to keep up with the arms race, however you did pick out the few posts of Ichirins I did like. Which bodes well for your alignment, I think?
