(1) populartajo- Darox
Four to lynch
I don't have the time to do a round of prods, so I just hope activity picks up again.
1. English is not my first language. So Im having a hard time exactly trying to understand what you are saying there. If I understand well, the "weak argument" is the assumption I made about RBT and kuribo being scum since he strangely left kuribo and me out of his accusations and I know Im town ?Darox wrote:1: Setting up weak arguments against yourself that you can easily quash to try and prevent real cases against you from forming
2: Pushing an argument against another player that you know is fallacious and incorrect.
3: Trying to discredit an argument by ignoring it rather than actually proving it false.
Explanation, NAO.hasdgfas wrote:unvote
I was just checking something. hmm.
reactions. I wanted to see your reaction to an unexplained vote and other people's reactions as well.populartajo wrote:Explanation, NAO.hasdgfas wrote:unvote
I was just checking something. hmm.
In Lylo?hasdgfas wrote:reactions. I wanted to see your reaction to an unexplained vote and other people's reactions as well.populartajo wrote:Explanation, NAO.hasdgfas wrote:unvote
I was just checking something. hmm.
yes, tajo, in lylo. Why is that so hard to believe?populartajo wrote:In Lylo?hasdgfas wrote:reactions. I wanted to see your reaction to an unexplained vote and other people's reactions as well.populartajo wrote:Explanation, NAO.hasdgfas wrote:unvote
I was just checking something. hmm.
I assume you feel satisfied with my answer.
Do you agree with Darox and kuribo reasons to vote me ?
What dont you like of my answers?hasdgfas wrote:yes, tajo, in lylo. Why is that so hard to believe?populartajo wrote:In Lylo?hasdgfas wrote:reactions. I wanted to see your reaction to an unexplained vote and other people's reactions as well.populartajo wrote:Explanation, NAO.hasdgfas wrote:unvote
I was just checking something. hmm.
I assume you feel satisfied with my answer.
Do you agree with Darox and kuribo reasons to vote me ?
It's not that I feel satisfied with your answer, it's that I wanted to do more pondering.
I do mostly agree with their reasons, actually, and you haven't done much to convince me otherwise.
I know right, it's crazy.populartajo wrote:@Has, I dont get how risking someone's lynch when there are 3-4 people not even posting can be protown behaviour. I assume you agree with Darox case, right?
same place we've been for the past five pages or so? (ie, arguing the same crap over and over and over and over and over and over and over)killa seven wrote:......... where is everyone?
Dude. The difference is that I think you are scum and I know I am town. Also, read back to find out that I think retro is my only town read in this mess.Darox wrote:I know right, it's crazy.populartajo wrote:@Has, I dont get how risking someone's lynch when there are 3-4 people not even posting can be protown behaviour. I assume you agree with Darox case, right?
In fact, it'sEXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE DOING RIGHT NOW.
I don't get how calling has out for placing a vote in lylo to make someone l-2 is somehow different from what you or retro did.
So what's the difference between hascow and retro, pop?