learn how to type what you mean then...dejkha wrote:You didn't acknowledge them until I posted that, is what I meant.AA wrote:I acknowledged these three. Let that be noted - he seems to have some chronological mix up with his quotes to manufacture back and forths.
AA wrote:I DID acknowledge the three points. And all of them were terrible
You stated I'm scummy for difference of opinions? Magic loldejkha wrote:If you bothered to read -AA wrote:If you bothered to read - I stated the difference between prodding to get things moving, and prodding when you're all out of ideas on how to get out of a situation.I statedwhy you're scummy for saying that.
If that's your logic at work there, I feel sorry for you.dejkha wrote:Why do you insist on speaking for everyone? We haven't cleared ourselves ofAA wrote:Niether you or Mix have cleared yourself of the suspicions. In fact, you're going so far as to mass post OPINIONATED nonesense against me. It's terribly weak.yoursuspicions, notthesuspicions. Are you speaking on behalf of your scumbuddies?
I said "the" - it's competely appropriate.
dejkha wrote:X FUCKING D. I didn't say that.AA wrote:Have you or have you not made it clear that you will lynch Zwet and Emp no matter what, and did you not say that there "happened to be a vote on them as well"
Post 351...dejkha wrote: Also, I doubt you've played with me enough to know thatI don't care if Zwet and/or Emp are lynched for poor reasons. They could be lynched for nothing for all I care, I'll lynch them both on policy.I justhappenedto have a reason this time.
I want you to soak in that for a minute....mmmm.... lol
This is an offense - try not to forget that you're the one being pointed at - I don't have blood on my hands, and you have a utility lynch on your hands as well as turning a blind eye to the Mix case - - what ARE your opinions on that? eh? loldejkha wrote: At least I can provide actual quotes to back myself up against your defenses....
So let me get this straight - - you're telling me you do NOT weigh options out before voting on a life to be taken? You lynch without thinking? because youre telling me I'm wrong for saying you DO - you do realize that, yes? loldejkha wrote:No, I'm telling you what you clearly haven't read. You said I "know what a mislynch does to a town andALWAYS weigh the options and possibilities out first". You said "always", and since I proved you wrong, it shows that you were lying about basing it off my "entire meta".
---------
So in addition to him being a liar, he's a lurker - - and yet you voted Zwet simply for "believing" him? lol richdejkha wrote:The liar hasn't been posting and I'm pretty sure both of you are scum, so I don't care who I investigate, as long as it's one of you.AA wrote:Why aren't you more concerned with the liar?
found'em... in fact - I'll post it again for fun.dejkha wrote:Plus, it'll give you the time to look for those quotes
And in case you're wondering - - yes, it IS fun laughing at your expense with my friends lol
Post 351
dejkha wrote: Also, I doubt you've played with me enough to know thatI don't care if Zwet and/or Emp are lynched for poor reasons. They could be lynched forI justnothingfor all I care, I'll lynch them both on policy.happenedto have a reason this time.
Mixologist 2 - AA23, AshMC1984
AA23 2 - Empking, dejkha