Mixologist 3 - AA23, AshMC1984, hewitt
AceMarksman 3 - Mixologist, Percy, dejkha
AA23 1 - Empking
I think the reasoning behind my vote is pretty damn good and vote-worthy.Mixologist wrote:@AA- The people you are accusing me of dirtly hoping behind, Ash and hewitt, are now shamelessly hoping on behind you.
The lie was lost on me, I honestly don't even know what it was. zwets stuck out to me as setting up a scumplay that I didn't think was right. I was wrong, but he seemed scummy to me and I explained my reasoning for voting for zwets pretty clearly.Mixologist wrote:@hewitt- You don't even mention Ace and the fact that he lied. Why did you vote zwet over Ace?
Lol ok. I never brought that up. Bit now that you mention it, Zwet's town flip was a card you played. You weren't on his wagon when he was lynched but you went after half the people that were.AA23 wrote:Dej - I'm not saying Ace is innocent, but his flipping villain WILL be a card for Mix to play - - what makes this a bad thing is Mix being a villain himself
Not really. All I see is bickering.AA23 wrote:In the post above your last from me to him - - you see no scum characteristics from him?
Actually, all cases are opinionated.AA23 wrote:Once again - I have no case on you, but your refusal to be open minded to things makes me uneasy - if I'm missing something, help me out, but this case is far from opinionated.
What say I? I say you've lied, been hypocritical and failed to back up your claims. So yeah, he appeared to make a vote that was opportunistic, but he explained and I still don't think anything of it.AA23 wrote:Mix has lied, been hypocritical, opportunistic, and is failing to justify his actions
What say you?
I have read the case, I just don't think it's a very big one. You and Ace take priority over him. You seem to think I failed to defend myself, yet no else seems to think so, so maybe he's not failing that much either.AA wrote:He's failing to defend himself - I request you please read the case
Let me say again. There is -zero- pressure on Ace to post. That is why he isn't. I'm not going to let someone who I think is scum fly under the radar. That is why I pursued Ace.Mixologist wrote:Ace is scum so bad it hurts. He is blatantly ignoring this game. Why? There is -zero- pressure on him to contribute. As long as he isn't under any pressure to contribute, he will continue to actively lurk.
Look back at the end of D1. Ace, again, was under -zero- pressure as everyone was focusing in on zwet. Percy and I, again, were the only ones voting him.
Mixologist wrote:The people you are accusing me of dirtly hoping behind, Ash and hewitt, are now shamelessly hoping on behind you. What do you make of that? Also, re-reading you AA, it should said that speaking in absolutes like you are concerning me actually implicate you. Saying that someone is 100% scum when you are not an investigative role implies that you have knowledge that the rest of us don't. Saying that implies that you are scum. Are you scum?
He makes a statement that someone IS scum, yet gives an out of the blue vote to someone SUSPECTED of being scum (and not even by him for the last how many pages)Mixologist wrote:Rolefishing for a counter-claim is about as good a D1 scumtell as we're going to get. I intend to see Ace lynched tomorrow. He is scum.
Mixologist wrote: So here was my thought process on switching my vote.
zwet's playstyle is null. Let me say that up front. However, if you read him over, can't mention specifics as some of the games are currently ongoing, there is a very distinct difference between scumzwet and townzwet.
Doesn't sound so "Null" anymore...pretty interesting how you like to flip flopMixologist wrote:Actually after re-reading both zwet and Ace in isolation I'm more interested in Ace.......
zwet might not be the brightest crayon in the box, but I doubt he would purposefully link himself to his scum buddy. I'm liking Ace more as Mafia and zwet as Wolf at this point.
unvote
vote AceMarksman
FOS hewitt
That's a lie, you didn't start the Ace wagon and you were second on it - - two contradictions.Mixologist wrote:
I don't like being on a wagon early, unless I am the one starting it.
Wow, splitting hairs....Mixologist wrote:Since when is -like- an absolute term?
Not the town's downfall? Yours? Are you seperate from us?Mixologist wrote: if I am lynched today, will be my downfall.
Anyone can vote for any reason - - If there's a case on them, go ahead and persue it - I'm voting you for my case, good sir.Mixologist wrote:The people you are accusing me of dirtly hoping behind,Ash and hewitt, are now shamelessly hoping on behind you. What do you make of that?
Mixologist wrote: Also, re-reading you AA, it should said that speaking in absolutes like you are concerning me actually implicate you.Saying that someone is 100% scum when you are not an investigative role implies that you have knowledge that the rest of us don't. Saying that implies that you are scum. Are you scum?
Mixologist wrote:Ace is scum so bad it hurts.
Mixologist wrote: I intend to see Ace lynched tomorrow. He is scum.
Post numbers are 115, 222 (which is on page 9, by the way). The discussion wasn't great, I agree. However, it is not the scumtell you think it is. By blowing it out ofAA23 wrote:1.I'd like the post numbers of your quotes where Mix apparently addresses the Zwet case beyond thos tidbits - -
2.I would like to read them in context
3.And I'd like to read what else was in the quotes.
Meh. Zwet was going to get lynched, Mix just hammered.AA23 wrote:4.Also - your opinion on the hypocrisy of him not moving to the wagon earlier.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------AshMC1984 wrote:Huh?AA23 wrote:there is Ash on the wagon who also has a tag that suggests policy lynching Zwet - - I'm not a fan of players who take pride in how quick they get players killed over how many scum they catch
Empking wrote:I don't find Mix overly scummy.
Why ask specifically about a case that you've pretty much stated you don't feel worth persuing when there's other current topics? Active lurking?Empking wrote:Thesp: What are your feelings on Mix?
I don't think that's it. I just think he's saying thatAA23 wrote:your argument suggests I should stop trying to lynch suspected scum (like Mix) because there are 4 other people worth lynching as WELL.
I think this was prescient as well.gorckat wrote:Afraid of a hammer after two people ahead of this post unvoted?Percy wrote:Unvote
Not willing to let scum hammer the Seer without a complete re-read to reaffirm or alleviate my suspicions.
Crud, this doesn't bode well for you ever believing me.Percy, re:AA23 wrote:A vicious pun! This makes me take you less seriously. The more confident and self-assured you proport yourself, the less I believe you.
Thanks!Khamisa wrote:In other news-Welcome, Thesp.
I disagree with you on him - I think he needs to die. Along with AA23 and dejhka. I'm happy lynching any of them. I don't mind the pressure on AceMarksman. There are some others I won't lynch that I'm not going into at this moment.Empking wrote:Thesp: What are your feelings on Mix?
Any reasons why? That's a pretty baseless statement that, if you don't elaborate on, would make me happy to see you "strung up".Thesp wrote:I think AA23 and dejhka both have substantial chances to be scum, which makes their back & forth interesting and awesome. I'd be happy seeing both strung up. I don't particularly care yet in which order.
You just "don't mind" it? So you want Me, AA and Mix lynched, but you're not sold on Ace? That's in need of serious explanation. How do all three of us take priority over someone that lied in an attempt to get an early lynch, lied even more to try and get out of the previous lie and then laid low ever since caught on both lies?Thesp wrote:I'm happy lynching any of them. I don't mind the pressure on AceMarksman.
Unless you do some serious explaining on the issues above, I'm gonna guess the people you're not going to lynch are your scumbuddies.Thesp wrote:There are some others I won't lynch that I'm not going into at this moment.