@AA23: I'm sorry if I offended you with my remarks, but I wasn't intending to be nasty. Your playstyle is frustrating, and I think that it's not helping the town.
I am not misrepresenting you in stating that you have been fairly absent on the discussion about Ace. Your clarification is noted, but you did hesitate for a good long while before deciding he's as suspicious as you now claim he is. You may claim that your attitudes were consistent, but I just don't buy it.
Still, I'd like to know what you mean by this:
AA23 wrote:- It is a variable - - a variable that is SUSPICIOUS, but until proven false, is not a SCUMTELL. Hence I found him suspicious
You're using wierd definitions here, and I'm confused.
What does it mean for his actions to be a 'variable'?
In what sense are you using the word 'scumtell'?
(as far as I'm concerned, a scumtell is not 100% definite proof that someone is scum, but rather, a particular phrase or position that is unlikely to be said or taken by a townie. I don't know what AA is looking for here, and why Mix's actions are a 'scumtell' and Ace's are not)
Empking 570 wrote:Why does town want attention before making a case?
Are you saying that you think lurking is a legitimate
town
strategy? Because what you're doing is the very definition of active lurking.
AA23 573 wrote:I feel like Mix through in the towel as a caught villain
Oh, really? And I suppose Ace just went for a long stroll?!
The case of 'caught villain giving up' is far stronger in support of the Ace case.
Khamisa 580 wrote:ASH wrote:If you vote for Ace, I'll hammer him.
If you vote for Mix, then it looks like either one of the Ace-wagoners will have to jump over to the Mix-wagon, or Mix will be lynched in a deadline lynch.
This is twisted in a way. Your more or less telling Thesp he can go the easy way by voting Ace, or going the hard way by having to persuade someone else. This situation is kind of leading.
Hmm, yes. Ash, are you happier with an Ace lynch than a Mix lynch?