Yos wrote:Eh, could be
Without anything to disprove it, what stops you from believing it?
but I don't buy it.
Again, what stops you from believing the very logical point I make?
Based on what I saw in that game
Which isn't my best play as scum, mind you.
I think that, when you are scum, you post less because as scum
No. I've got meta to prove it--
Open 131--Vanilla. I fell behind, didn't post a great deal.
Newbie 763--I fell six pages behind. Townie.
Many other ongoing games.
Do your homework, Yos. I've been proven town in many games that are ongoing; look into my posts there and you'd see that this is normal.
you're paranoid about how anything you say might make you look bad
Answer me this, something I asked which you failed to answer:
WITHOUT PARTNERS TO DAYTALK TO, WHAT IS TO STOP ME FROM POSTING?!?
Let's look at my scum QT posts, shall we?
Mastin, Lynch All Lurkers QT, Asking Tajo wrote:As you don't think I should lurk, I think I'll admit that I've seen some of the play in the game, but that I need to catch up. Something along these lines:
"Hai, there. I'm kinda sad nobody seemed to notice that I replaced Antihero. I've read a few of the early and later-on pages, so I know a few events in the game, yet I definitely need to read up on the rest."
Does that sound good? I'll wait for your confirmation.
Tajo's response wrote:Post this:
"Hai, there. I'm kinda sad nobody seemed to notice that I replaced Antihero.
Im here and Ill catch up as soon as possible."
Mastin in Scum QT wrote:I'm thinking of viewing Antihero's posts in isolation--if I do that, maybe I can turn some of his posts into breadcrumbs later on for my usage if there's something to suggest he's a power role. After all, I'm known for 'dropping four loafs' in my breadcrumb trail, so, again, it might be considered scummy if I don't breadcrumb. I've breadcrumbed as vanilla to be cop and gotten myself shot, and can always lie and say that I wasn't breadcrumbing at all.
But, more likely than not, I'll still (when it comes to mass-claim time) likely claim vanilla.
Thoughts?
(These will be VERY VITAL later on in the game)
---
On a side note, should I go with my 'reply to everything I find worthy' approach on the sixty plus pages of the game, or 'sum up my opinions' approach?
Should I blatantly lie about my opinion to side with rofl/Xyl? I personally believe that it'd be a bad idea, as previous games would show why I disagree with them. (Quite personally, I thought Xyl and rofl were two of the scum and that both you and DGB were town before I got my role PM)
Or should I go completely honest, no matter who it seems to attack?
Tajo's Response wrote:Just pretend you are rereading the game and dont post anything yet.
Does that seem like someone who'd do this always as scum?
Heck no; I did it because we had daytalking abilities and I took advantage of them.
Need more?
Mastin wrote:I am thinking of posting this:
[what I'll say]
I informed the mod that I would be V/LA from Friday to at least Sunday, but I am back, now. Sadly, due to this, I have read very little. I haven't read the early pages of the game, but I browsed the pages after I replaced in, the last thing I saw being DGB being lynched. I apologize for the lack of content so far, but it will come in groups of long posts, each covering ~20 pages of the game with my thoughts so far.
When I do this, though, it can be one of two ways:
1: I give lots of content, commenting on everything
or
2: I point out whatever I find very interesting, along with general thoughts.
As soon as I get some feedback as to which method would be preferred, I'll start reading.
[/end what I will say]
Your thoughts?
Tajo's Response wrote:
I like your post, perfect entrance. The normal townie reaction after this situation is to look bad at the people pushing dgb lynch but not call them obv scum. Try not to ignore me or Empking too much. Treat me as kinda scummy at the beginning but after my defense of dgb you are less inclined to believe me as scum. Treat Empking as neutral. Then feel free to comment anything on the rest, specially say that Xyl looks bad.
--
Also, please dont post this : "As soon as I get some feedback as to which method would be preferred, I'll start reading."
Use the method you like for better "scumhuting". Comment on everything when you want to or point out anything interesting you find out. Dont let town control your methods.
Oh, I forgot:
A vital part of my early scum post:
Mastin, Lynch All Lurkers, Without Editing part of the post out wrote:Sure, I'll follow you. I'm generally a good player, and I definitely enjoy leading my team as both scum and town, as my strategies often do good in games such as this. However, I recognize when a player is of greater skill and experience than me, and when any of these are true, they have the advantage:
1: They've been playing the game since the beginning,
2: They know most of the players from experience,
3: They've already been leading when I replace in,
4: They already formulated strategies,
and so on. They're all true for you, so I'd be ready to follow you 'til you die.
As you don't think I should lurk, I think I'll admit that I've seen some of the play in the game, but that I need to catch up. Something along these lines:
"Hai, there. I'm kinda sad nobody seemed to notice that I replaced Antihero. I've read a few of the early and later-on pages, so I know a few events in the game, yet I definitely need to read up on the rest."
Does that sound good? I'll wait for your confirmation.
This is not the case this game, and I definitely would be leading. The ONLY people here who I might not try leading, pretty much, would be OGML, Yos, and Iamausername, mods I have played under.
Oh, this is important as well.
Mastin wrote:Xyl would also notice that I'm a bit short on time, recently. I've become less vocal due to it, and, well,
it's also a tactic to avoid being night-killed
.
:/
I didn't post only you; I mentioned image as well.
And then, the next mentions Xyl and Brian.
Not really an issue, in my opinion.
As for reasons, I'll likely give them when I catch up. I *am* behind...
GREATEST FEAR AS SCUM: Making a slip about knowing something I shouldn't know. That *really* seems to be a possible problem every time I post... (referring to my latest post)
Keep in mind that this was WITH Tajo's guidance.
Tajo's Calming Response wrote:Kay, until now youve done an awesome job.
And that fear is okay. I have it too. Everytime you post, try to reread and see if you are not slipping anything or if you dont feel to sure, let me know what you are posting so we can analise it.
Mastin wrote:No fair. I'm called scum for something I've done in two other games, and for being in more games than zwet, and being behind a lot. ;_;
Tajo, come back and post something in here, already. >_>
Anyway, what I next plan to say:
"GAH. Lost the weekend time due to real life issues. I needed the time to read...
Would anyone mind if I just started looking at the comments made within the last two or three pages?
Or alternatively, multiple people (to prevent bias) giving a rough graph of the events of the game?"
Tajo's response wrote:Mastin, please, stop looking for and posting excuses for not being able to contribute. Thats scummy.
You have to start "scumhuting". Ask questions to everyone, like in the other game we are together. Rolf and some others thinks that anithero was town so please you have to state suspicions before they realize you are playing the Im behind card.
Eventually you will have to vote image but first express your bad feelings regarding how useless SK and Empking are, the overall badd feeling Xyl has, the idea that you paranoid about elvis and rolf being scum together.
As I said, what about if you post here so we can analyse what are you going to post...
Tajo wrote:Mastin.
Im going to keep youy safe for some more hours but you have to come back and claim cop or doc.
Preferably doc.
PM me when you are online.
I ignored most of Tajo's response, other than the Doctor claim.
...
. . .
It...was...that...long...
That...long...
Too...long...
I screwed up...
No time to wait for you; I'm posting now with a doctor claim. I can't wait any longer. Sorry, Tajo.
Tajo's Response wrote:Mastin
no wait.
It was too late; I had already claimed.
Read it all, if you want.
---
Want me to go into my Polygamist Mafia QT to further prove you wrong, Yos?
Yos wrote: It's a common trait amoung scum, actually.
Which I was ONLY following because I had DAYTALKING ABILITIES.
I don't see how daytalking or not has anything to do with it.
IT MAKES A
HUGE
DIFFERENCE!
Without Daytalking, I am on my own, regardless of my alignment. I have no others to guide me. I have only myself. I have to be a leader, and if I were to be scum, to pray that my partner(s) follow subtle hints I give them.
Do you have a counter-example, of a game when you were scum and yet you were very active all game?
Look, I am almost never scum. If there were to be one, it'd be ongoing, Yos.
Well, that's part of it, sure.
Part?
No.
It's ALL of it.
I had people to lead me. Good players, who I put my confidence in their abilities.
I think this is also a part of why you're less active as scum then as town:
I know. It doesn't change the fact that I've also got a counter to that, Yos:
I believe, and always have, that long posts are pro-town for that VERY reason you linked. Look at 735, 742, or any of my other games, for that matter.
They're pro-town, because if you're mafia, it gives you more times to potentially slip up and expose yourself.
So, naturally, as scum, you want shorter posts to avoid slipping.
Look at my posts in there:
Fairly short.
Look at my posts here:
Fairly long.
And tell me your example is still valid, please. I DARE you to.
I think that that very problem, that fear that you might say something wrong as scum, inherently makes you post less when you're scum.
It also applies to post length. Meaning that I want shorter posts as scum.
Not the case here, Yos.
Pfft.
Yea, yea, shut up. I am sick and tired of people trying to metagame me in offense, yet discounting my defense with meta. I've done this several times before. (I'll ask the mod if I can give the link to an ongoing game where I died DAY ONE because of logic such as YOURS conflicting with MINE. Oh, did I mention I was town, then?)
You think you can just declare that metaing you won't work
In attack?
and therefore that anyone who suspects you for meta reasons will "earn your suspicions"?
Yes.
They're clinging to VERY weak excuses for attacking/voting me. Which is incredibly suspicious.
(Did I mention I think it's Yos-Iamausername?)
Everyone plays differently when they're scum from when they're town.
I don't.
Lynch all Lurkers?
Yea. I was mimicking my play in other games. Open 131, for example. It also happened in the game where I was lynched day one as town.
Everyone has certain patterns of play.
Not me.
Some people are harder to meta then others
NOBODY can Metagame Me in attack and have it work,
NOBODY.
Not even myself.
but I doubt there is anyone who is so perfect that metaing them is completly worthless.
You're looking right at him.
You "think" I am scum.
You are wrong.
You just found that person.
People in an ongoing game found that person (me).
Face it:
Metagaming Me in Attack Will Not Work.
Also, if there is a difference between your town meta and your scum meta
Oh, there isn't.
you are unlikely to be aware of it
I am PERFECTLY aware of my town meta, and can imitate it as scum.
Hence, YES, I *AM* aware of my meta.
so you claiming "METAING ME DOSN'T WORK" as a defence is complete crap.
READ ALL OF MY ONGOING GAMES. Until I get clearance from the mod, at least. One particular mini game shows full good and well why this statement holds true. GO LOOK BEFORE MAKING SUCH STATEMENTS.
Well, daytalking or not, scum always know too much, though; that's part of what makes them scum.
BUT I HAVE NO REASON TO BE CAUTIOUS IF I AM NOT ASKING MY PARTNER IF WHAT I AM SAYING IS ALRIGHT!
That's why it took so long to post in Lynch all Lurkers--
I was waiting for Tajo to approve of my messages.
NOT the case in other games, other than Polygamist Mafia and Ace/ekiM/Zaz.
There is nothing BS about my meta argument, and I have never "twisted your words" or "used bad logic" to my knowlege in this game.
Your Argument is Twisting my Words as Scum in Lynch all Lurkers, for what you describe is NOT the full truth.
Hence, it is BS.
heh.
Can't a guy have fun?
This argument is getting heated. Seriously heated. I love that kind of thing.
Oh, I'm sure you're having fun.
More fun than I'll ever have as scum, where fear will get the best of me.
dominates me as scum, especially when something bad happens. While I have the thrill of the challenge as scum, fear will always dominate over that.
As town, nope, not so much.
It's always fun to be fighting for your life.
Not nearly as much when you're scum.
More proof that I am, in fact, town.
That's irrelevent, though.
No, it's PERFECTLY relevant! It proves why I am town, having so much fun with being so close to death!
Also, your claim here
Well, it's true.
(which was that you apparently on some level lurked BECAUSE you wanted to be attacked, because you know you have a meta of lurking as scum)
I love being attacked as town. The thrill of the hunt and attacking the scum on my wagon, oh, it's so powerful.
seems to completly contradict your other claim that you do not have a meta of lurking as scum.
Oh, I don't.
It's just that others THINK I do.
I know that I don't lurk only as scum.
However, this is the THIRD game where I have been accused of it as town.
nods) Yup. I thought you were town day 1.
And your reversal from thinking I'm town to "ZOMG WHY ISN'T THIS SCUM DEAD YET" is INCREDIBLY scummy.
100% wrong.
Heck no.
If I think a player is scummy,
And suddenly think they are town the next,
Or vice versa,
It shows inconsistency. Inconsistency is a scum tell.
To suddenly reverse an opinion is one of the largest scum tells in existence.
I am fine with a gradual change.
"He's town"
"I think he's town."
"He's probably town, not sure, though."
"He might be town"
"He might be scum"
"He's probably scum"
"He's scum".
That is fine.
It's a slow change, over time.
A SUDDEN change, now, THAT is scummy!
Town should always be willing to change their minds.
Which they do gradually. Only scum have sudden reversals of opinions. And I stand firm by this as fact.
There are a lot of reasons for that;
And there are lots of reasons why SUDDENLY *REVERSING* an opinion is scummy as well.
the prime one being that, if people just keep going after the same suspects all game and trusting the same people all game, then it's very easy for the scum to manipulate the game by careful use of nightkills.
Again, I have no problem with gradual changes, which prevent this.
Sudden changes?
Still scummiest thing one can do.
Beyond that, changing your mind is much better at getting reactions and finding scum then never doing so.
Again,
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH CHANGING ONE'S OPINION. IT IS WITH A
CHANGE WHERE THE PROBLEMS LIE.
The scariest scumhunters are the people who think you're town, then suddenly flip on you and go after you based on some new piece of information;
More like the scummiest.
those are both the best at finding scum, and the best at screwing with scum's gameplans.
Gradual change-->Not scummy, still throws scum off.
Sudden change-->Scummiest thing someone can do.
I've gone so far in the past as to declare that consistancy itself is a scumtell.
And THAT is an EXTREMELY anti-town opinion.
Inconsistency is a SCUM TELL,
Consistency is a TOWN TELL.
Ok, I'm even happier about my vote on Mastin now.
Because I've nailed the remaining mafia man, AND nailed the werewolves.
Dang, I'm good.
Let's lynch Iamausername, Yos's scum partner.
Are you really calling it scummy that I think Iamusername looks town-ish, and saying I want to hear more from him?
Many people had not contributed a great deal at the time. Like me.
You address ONLY Iamausername.
And THAT is a scum tell.
You're also buddying up to Iamausername.
I declared that you looked town-ish earlier
And your switch is scummy.
and that OGML looked townish earlier
With my current thoughts, I am agreeing with this assessment.
and you didn't have a problem with either of those.
Because you were addressing other people at the same time.
You went OUT OF YOUR WAY to address ONLY Iamausername, which is INCREDIBLY scummy.
OGML also earlier said he thought Iamusername looked town, and you had no problem with that either
Because he was also addressing multiple people.
YOU, however, addressed ONLY Iamausername.
There's clearly nothing wrong with either one of those things;
Oh, yes.
Yes, there is:
The fact that you did it to ONLY Iamausername in a SINGLE OUT OF THE WAY POST.
there's nothing wrong me thinking someone looks town.
But to, OUT OF THE BLUE, state it WITH NO APPARENT REASON, THAT is scummy.
SO your attack does not appear to be honestly motivated here.
Oh, yes. It is. This is my true opinion. I NEVER lie about my opinions in Mafia games. EVER. Not as scum, not as town.
You look like a struggling scum here
No. Just town in a heated debate which I am enjoying very much. Thanks for the challenge, Yos. You can die tomorrow as caught scum.
trying to fight back and claw your way out any way you can.
Why give up as town?
It'd violate my moral code.
Especially since people wouldn't listen to me, DESPITE THE FACT THAT I HAVE THE SCUM NAILED ALREADY.
OGML wrote:Unvote, Vote: Mastin
L-1, and I haven't even gotten the chance to type up why Yos and Iamausername are scum.
Pretty sure Mastin-wolf indicates Yos2-wolf.
...After what we've been through, that is SERIOUSLY your opinion?!?
What's wrong with you people?!? <_<