Open 163 (Jungle Republic)- Game Over before 835
-
-
DTMaster Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4712
- Joined: May 28, 2009
- Location: Bracing himself in Canada.
-
-
hasdgfas Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5628
- Joined: October 2, 2007
- Location: Madison, WI
Did you even read the explanation, or any of the thread I linked? It goes over why posting a lot makes it easy for their scummy actions to be ignored. Because of the massive amount of info that they produce, their scummy actions will be passed over to get to other things that can be commented on.ThAdmiral wrote:
Even if this were true, which is debatable*, it doesn't have any bearing on a persons alignment within any given game.hasdgfas wrote:found it:Yaw wrote:Walls of text(or spamfests) are an obfuscation tactic. I'm not sure if it's conscious logic, but it goes something like this: if a player determines that they can't avoid making scum tells, the strategy then becomes to make them as hard to find as possible. That means posting more stuff. Of course, posting more also has to happen in town roles, otherwise a simple word count becomes a tell. In addition to this strategy being problematic to games, it's also unfortunate as a strategy -- someone embracing this has decided to stop improving their play. The better idea is to learn what mistakes one makes as scum and work to avoid doing them in the future. Furthermore, it promotes an anti-town meta, in which players can't be read because they're either lurking (unable to keep up with the walls) or posting too much crap to be analyzed.
* for example: more posting equals more of a chance for someone to slip as scum. If someone knows they are going to slip then posting a lot would make it worse for them, not better.
I already explained this. It throws so much information at the town that there's no way of telling what's useful and what's noise.admiral wrote:
Can you elaborate on this.hasdgfas wrote:it, however, is extremelydetrimental to the town, which is really what this is about.
ThAdmiral, I don't mean to be rude, but how much of this game have you read? From your posts, I'm getting the feeling that it's not that much.jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow-
-
fuzzylightning Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 787
- Joined: July 7, 2008
- Location: Michigan/New York (depends on the time of year)
Vote Count #10
peacesells: 1(Kill-kill)
hasdgfas: 1(hohum)
Saberwolf: 2(ZazieR, Nikanor)
hohum: 5(DTMaster, saberwolf, Toro, Scott Brosius, Shotty to the Body)
Toro: 1(ThAdmiral)
Not Voting:(hasdgfas, peacesells)
With 12 Alive it takes 7 votes for a lynch.
Deadline is now Sunday September 13, 2009 4 PM EDT2-1 as Town (including the 39 minute final day)
0-1 as Mafia-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I read the first few pages but skipped them when I did the summary and he hasn't posted anything up until he was called out for lurking and I'd already addressed that in another post. I double-checked to be sure I wasn't being led astray by scum and I was ready to vote once I'd confirmed he was lying.Scott Brosius wrote:
You vote hohum but didn't mention him in your Summarization post. Why is that?Shotty to the Body wrote:This whole discussion about Zazie's post style doesn't affect his alignment in this game. Zazie does that in all his games. Whether the style itself may be inherently more useful to a scum-player that has no relevance to his alignment now. Any attempt at using his poststyle as a scum-tell is scummy in itself. Since he clearly does it all the time trying to persuade him to change his style is a waste of our time so let's get our focus back on the game.
Vote Hohum
After double checking Icanhascow is correct about him."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Shotty to the Body Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1596
- Joined: May 4, 2009
- Location: Scumchat
I don't see how we can command him to post a certain way, I don't really have a problem perusing his posts. It takes some effort but he puts links in all of them so it's fairly clear.hasdgfas wrote:
Missing the point. I have told zazier to stop because he's being distracting. If he now keeps posting like this, itShotty to the Body wrote:This whole discussion about Zazie's post style doesn't affect his alignment in this game. Zazie does that in all his games. Whether the style itself may be inherently more useful to a scum-player that has no relevance to his alignment now. Any attempt at using his poststyle as a scum-tell is scummy in itself. Since he clearly does it all the time trying to persuade him to change his style is a waste of our time so let's get our focus back on the game.willbe scummy."By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest." -Confucius-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
-
-
ThAdmiral Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5920
- Joined: September 20, 2006
- Location: The Hills
That is not fact though it is just a theory, and it assumes that people are going to just pass over the large amount of text without reading it which I believe some might do but a lot wouldn't.hasdgfas wrote:Did you even read the explanation, or any of the thread I linked? It goes over why posting a lot makes it easy for their scummy actions to be ignored. Because of the massive amount of info that they produce, their scummy actions will be passed over to get to other things that can be commented on.
How would you define "useful" and "noise".hasdgfas wrote:
I already explained this. It throws so much information at the town that there's no way of telling what's useful and what's noise.admiral wrote:
Can you elaborate on this.hasdgfas wrote:it, however, is extremelydetrimental to the town, which is really what this is about.
I've read through the entire game, but haven't done any deep analysis. I read pretty quickly to catch up but I think I have a pretty good grasp of what is happening.hasdgfas wrote:ThAdmiral, I don't mean to be rude, but how much of this game have you read? From your posts, I'm getting the feeling that it's not that much.-
-
Scott Brosius Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: April 19, 2009
Considering there is only one power role (seer) in this open setup, I see no point to claiming. It's weird that you would mention this if you were town. So either you are a lazy town who forgot the setup, or you are anti-town sniffing out the power role. Cain was at L-2. SW was at L-2. Why only mention this when hohum is at L-2?DTMaster wrote:Oh btw town Hohum is L-2 FYI. Usually this is the claim point if the town is leaning in this direction.Town 15-19
Mafia 4-3-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
-
-
saberwolf Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: June 14, 2009
- Location: In your head
I kind of agree with scott.
It's useless for the player claiming because, whether or not he's actually telling the truth, he'll get NKed anyways, as there is no doc or equivilent to prevent it. The only good part to the claim would be town would back off and increase their chances of a day 1 anti-town lynchShowsaberwolf XIX (2:53:59 AM): what do you know about bigger and better? >.>
drench394 (2:54:04 AM): um
drench394 (2:54:13 AM): i've been going through puberty for the better part of a year now
The Last Post Bandit strikes again!-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
Well, if someone we were about to lynch ends up geting nk'd, it's better for the town because it gives us more of a chance to hit scum with our lynch, and it forces scum to use their nk on a potential mislynch.saber wrote:It's useless for the player claiming because, whether or not he's actually telling the truth, he'll get NKed anyways, as there is no doc or equivilent to prevent it. The only good part to the claim would be town would back off and increase their chances of a day 1 anti-town lynch
On that note, if someone falseclaims seer, I recommend the true seer to not counterclaim until the day before lylo, so that we get as many investigations in as possible, while still leaving room for a mislynch to confirm or deny the seer's counterclaim.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!-
-
Scott Brosius Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: April 19, 2009
In this setup, claiming at all. If hohum claimed VT right now, would we all get off his case?Nikanor wrote:
Do you mean no point in claiming at L-2, or no point in claiming at all?Scott Brosius wrote:Considering there is only one power role (seer) in this open setup, I see no point to claiming.Town 15-19
Mafia 4-3-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
No, but if he claimed seer, that's a different story.Scott wrote:In this setup, claiming at all. If hohum claimed VT right now, would we all get off his case?
Not giving him a chance to claim is foolish. Only scum can benefit from the accidental lynching of a power role. I don't see why you are opposed to a claim, if you are a part of the town.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!-
-
Toro Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
This is giving me a really bad vibe from both you and Scott now, sounds as if you two are werewolves and you'd want to make sure that Hohum (if he's the seer) doesn't speak to try and clear himself.saberwolf wrote:I kind of agree with scott.
It's useless for the player claiming because, whether or not he's actually telling the truth, he'll get NKed anyways, as there is no doc or equivilent to prevent it. The only good part to the claim would be town would back off and increase their chances of a day 1 anti-town lynch
UnvoteVote: SaberwolfShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0-
-
saberwolf Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: June 14, 2009
- Location: In your head
have to say i agree with nikanor with this. It is a benefit for town if any false claims happen.
but what IF hohum IS seer? That would suck.
Is this working well in hohum's favour though?...all he's gotta do is read the threads and act accordingly now that we prematurly set the stage up with this whole discussion. However it is almost a guarantee now that he won't live past night 1.
So what now? what works in our best interests as town? Guess we shouldn't get too far ahead of ourselves...I'll wait for hohum's claim.Showsaberwolf XIX (2:53:59 AM): what do you know about bigger and better? >.>
drench394 (2:54:04 AM): um
drench394 (2:54:13 AM): i've been going through puberty for the better part of a year now
The Last Post Bandit strikes again!-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
Way to try to discredit a potential seer claim by hohum.saberwolf wrote:Is this working well in hohum's favour though?...all he's gotta do is read the threads and act accordingly now that we prematurly set the stage up with this whole discussion. However it is almost a guarantee now that he won't live past night 1.
And it's almost guaranteed he won't live through night one IF he claims seer.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!-
-
saberwolf Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: June 14, 2009
- Location: In your head
I'm not discrediting anything. I actually feel bad for hohum, as he's stuck betwen a rock and a hard place. If Hohum does claim seer, I will gladly get off and put my vote on somebody else...particularly DTMaster for tactfully setting up this whole conversation.Nikanor wrote:
Way to try to discredit a potential seer claim by hohum.saberwolf wrote:Is this working well in hohum's favour though?...all he's gotta do is read the threads and act accordingly now that we prematurly set the stage up with this whole discussion. However it is almost a guarantee now that he won't live past night 1.
And it's almost guaranteed he won't live through night one IF he claims seer.Showsaberwolf XIX (2:53:59 AM): what do you know about bigger and better? >.>
drench394 (2:54:04 AM): um
drench394 (2:54:13 AM): i've been going through puberty for the better part of a year now
The Last Post Bandit strikes again!-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
-
-
saberwolf Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: June 14, 2009
- Location: In your head
I personally would love for him to claim seer. It would make our job as town easier. BUT I'm hoping he really isn't seer. It would be in our best interests as town for a fake claim and create WIFOM for scum to debate on...Toro wrote:
This is giving me a really bad vibe from both you and Scott now, sounds as if you two are werewolves and you'd want to make sure that Hohum (if he's the seer) doesn't speak to try and clear himself.saberwolf wrote:I kind of agree with scott.
It's useless for the player claiming because, whether or not he's actually telling the truth, he'll get NKed anyways, as there is no doc or equivilent to prevent it. The only good part to the claim would be town would back off and increase their chances of a day 1 anti-town lynch
UnvoteVote: Saberwolf
I just really hope hohum isn't seer, or we're screwed.Showsaberwolf XIX (2:53:59 AM): what do you know about bigger and better? >.>
drench394 (2:54:04 AM): um
drench394 (2:54:13 AM): i've been going through puberty for the better part of a year now
The Last Post Bandit strikes again!-
-
saberwolf Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: June 14, 2009
- Location: In your head
it wasn't until the conversation developed [when I saw nik and scott talking] that I started giving my own input, but I fully realise what could go down.Nikanor wrote:Why DTM? You say he started the conversation, but you and I are propagating it. If this conversation is so bad, why aren't you trying to stop it? You know what they say, 'if you're not part of the solution...'
Think about it...why NOW does DTMaster ask someone to claim at L-2?
1. He is in the same faction, an is desperately attempting to get his buddy out of a hard place. It would work for them both if they are both werewolves. Hohum claims seer, and they get away with it until seer actually gets lynched. Only problem with this:
a) seer gets lynched early, Hohum is taken out next [obviously] and we suspect DTMaster for his connections. We might not even have to lynch him, if they are werewolves, but I could be wrong about the connection as well, this is simply my viewpoint.
b) Seer stays alive for quite some time, gets the dirt on a couple of scum, and then claims and reveals what he/she's got. Hohum then gets lynched, and we are in a super good position.
So this would be a super gamble, hoping seer gets lynched midgame. They would have to be able to control the outcome, hence making them mafia, and not werewolves.
Or there is:
2. DTMaster is an anti-town faction, knows that hohum is not on his faction, and figures any non-alignment lynch is a good lynch. He has after all almost certainly fixed Hohum's death, whether it's by lynch or NK. Only problem with this theory is...why not do this for Cain or myself?
so that's my thoughts for now...gotta think about this and analyze it further...for now, I'll be back later...I'm going out with my buddy to pick up dinner. [im using his laptop at his place.]Showsaberwolf XIX (2:53:59 AM): what do you know about bigger and better? >.>
drench394 (2:54:04 AM): um
drench394 (2:54:13 AM): i've been going through puberty for the better part of a year now
The Last Post Bandit strikes again!-
-
Scott Brosius Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: April 19, 2009
I was more talking about what saber said. It's useless for the player claiming because with such few power roles, that player will probably get lynched regardless. Obviously it can give more information to the town if a player fakeclaims seer and is alive the next day. I'm fine with hohum claiming, but claims in this setup are not going to hold much water given the lack of power roles. Hence my saying they are useless.Nikanor wrote:
Well, if someone we were about to lynch ends up geting nk'd, it's better for the town because it gives us more of a chance to hit scum with our lynch, and it forces scum to use their nk on a potential mislynch.saber wrote:It's useless for the player claiming because, whether or not he's actually telling the truth, he'll get NKed anyways, as there is no doc or equivilent to prevent it. The only good part to the claim would be town would back off and increase their chances of a day 1 anti-town lynch
On that note, if someone falseclaims seer, I recommend the true seer to not counterclaim until the day before lylo, so that we get as many investigations in as possible, while still leaving room for a mislynch to confirm or deny the seer's counterclaim.
My point in bringing this up initially was not to dwell on claiming strategy but to point out DTMaster's difference in behavior when different people were at L-2.Town 15-19
Mafia 4-3-
-
Scott Brosius Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: April 19, 2009
Why can we only be werewolves? Since you are mafia and know your other members? Mafia-slip perhaps?Toro wrote:
This is giving me a really bad vibe from both you and Scott now, sounds assaberwolf wrote:I kind of agree with scott.
It's useless for the player claiming because, whether or not he's actually telling the truth, he'll get NKed anyways, as there is no doc or equivilent to prevent it. The only good part to the claim would be town would back off and increase their chances of a day 1 anti-town lynchif you two are werewolvesand you'd want to make sure that Hohum (if he's the seer) doesn't speak to try and clear himself.
UnvoteVote: SaberwolfTown 15-19
Mafia 4-3-
-
DTMaster Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4712
- Joined: May 28, 2009
- Location: Bracing himself in Canada.
@Town
Sorry been awayish. I forgot there was only one PR. :< I'm used to the traditional cop/doc/etc in other mafia and see the anti-town side to the claim. But after reading Nik's posts I also see the pros.
@Scott
I checked the records and the only person who was at L-2 was sabre so unless you can show that people voted/unvoted before the vote count.
fuzzylightning 7 wrote:Vote Count #4
hasdgfas: 1(Cain)
Kill-kill: 1(DTMaster)
Cain: 2(Kill-kill, Scott Brosius)
Nikanor: 2(hohum, saberwolf)
Saberwolf: 5(lumi, Toro, hasdgfas, ZazieR, Nikanor)
Not Voting:(ThAdmiral, saberwolf)
With 12 Alive it takes 7 votes for a lynch.
Prod going out on hohum
I believe the sabre wagon died down to cain afterwards so the L-2 situation was averted. I was also focused on a Kill-kill discussion I think and responding to Zazie.fuzzylightning 8 wrote:Vote Count #5
hasdgfas: 1(Cain)
Kill-kill: 1(DTMaster)
Cain: 3(Kill-kill, Scott Brosius, lumi)
Nikanor: 2(hohum, saberwolf)
Saberwolf: 5(Toro, hasdgfas, ZazieR, Nikanor)
Not Voting:(ThAdmiral, saberwolf)
With 12 Alive it takes 7 votes for a lynch.
Prodding Cain
@Sabre
1. No, claiming seer would make the town's job harder in some ways. He would not get any results in if he was the real seer and would die by NK. If this was a fake claim then we can attack him tomorrow. If it was a fake claim on the mafia side though, yes it would make it would be definately easier for town.
2. I'm fixed on a hohum kill? Um when did I say this? I confirmed has' case and voted on him for lying and right now am pursuing him for that reason. If someone turns up scummier then him or he claims seer, I wouldn't continue pressing him on this. 5 people are pursuing him on this, so obviously there is something wrong with hohum's actions.
You seem to jump to the wagon only after has voted and before I brought up meta evidence to support Has' statements.This makes you look like you are fixated on "the easy kill". I find it intresting that you didn't vote until Has did, in fact:
Has votes.saberwolf 441 wrote:
what the hell is this?hohum wrote:\o/
3. I asked for the claim since hohum has been away and is literally not posting. L-2 is safer to ask it and it brings it out in the open then waiting till L-1 and having someone frustrate lynch over hohum's actions (well lack there of in posting).saberwolf wrote:unvote; vote: hohum
the hell with this, if he isn't scum, he's a liability.
Also some people traditionally start addressing claims at the L-2 point, but I forgot that we only have 1 PR and no docs. :s-
-
Scott Brosius Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: April 19, 2009
L-2fuzzylightning wrote:Vote Count #6
Cain: 5(Kill-kill, Scott Brosius, lumi, DTMaster, Toro)
Nikanor: 2(hohum, saberwolf)
Saberwolf: 3(hasdgfas, ZazieR, Nikanor)
Not Voting:(ThAdmiral, Cain)
With 12 Alive it takes 7 votes for a lynch.
Prodding hohum, lumi, saberwolf, ThAdmiral,
Searching for a replacement for CainTown 15-19
Mafia 4-3-
-
DTMaster Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4712
- Joined: May 28, 2009
- Location: Bracing himself in Canada.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.