Post 708: A minute discrepancy is something extremely picky to look at.
For all we know Hohum could have posted his original post at 3:34:59 and did his vote shortly after. The fact that hohum posted within a minute between each post in a double post just signify that the two should be linked together as one post.
714: I checked the google meta call on hohum. In fact it was this post that I corrected myself since I double check the time stamps and confirmed Hohum posted in other games after the 17th. I misread because across the board he posted on Sept 3rd with the same post in all his games.
I was the first person to check so its misrep from you to say I didn't meta checked. I even outlined how to google search hohum's games when the bar was down.
717: Are there any specifics you want to address in that post? You point is vague here.
719: I get it. Though if people do not read your posts and you argue back them with proof through quotes then it's the player's fault for not taking the time and effort to read through your posts.
721:
Indigo works
if you want to use it on me. I don't care really since I catch most of your questions and would hope you/the town will point out when and if I miss one.735: So I assume you are saying 2 things here, let me clarify if this is right:
1. We would gain information here.
2. You make the point that it looks like I'm deflecting the lynch away from Hohum.
What kind of information would you gain from Hohum? You seem to insinuate something along those lines with number 2 here.
739: I was asked the question to weigh the pros and cons of lynching hohum. We have no strong reads on him. He's generally playing anti-town and the meta evidence from the google search confirmed he's lying.
I strongly just get a sense of anti-town play rather then scummy play here, but the latter argument points towards scum-hohum.
Also I wasn't "warning" any one. Read the exchange between Kill and myself on the topic of quick lynching and Peace's fake vote. I was saying that it would be scummy for someone to quick lynch under those circumstances when Kill outlined that Peace is scummy for false voting to lure someone to quick lynch. It doesn't clear the eager hammerer as town nor does it make sense since in Kill's reasoning he outlined that Peace's scenario is a townie move.
I'm still awaiting his response but his classes take priority here.
@Nik
738: How can you for sure say that I'm not getting killed tonight? You can't predict this accurately unless you are wolf-scum.
