PookyTheMagicalBear: 6 (iamausername, populartajo, roflcopter, Thesp, Yosarian2, zu_Faul)
populartajo: 5 (charter, ekiM, elvis_knits, Kmd4390, SerialClergyman)
iamausername: 1 (PookyTheMagicalBear)
Not Voting: 1 (VP Baltar)
Well, right. But, of course, if you don't think tajo is scum, then you also don't think any of those other people are scum.SerialClergyman wrote: Tajo isn't just claiming he is town, he's claiming he, charter, rofl, yos and vp are ALL town. It's
not just a question of whether you think Tajo is scum, it's a question of whether you think ANY of those people are scum.
I'm making this clear to you for a reason. If you are town, I expect you to protect rofl tonight. If you are scum, then I hope that the knowlege that you will be lynched tomorrow if rofl dies may prevent you from killing him. That's also why I wanted you to specifically verify that you had heard and understood it.Yos asks me if I KNOW that I'm getting lynched on a rofl flip and I'm not sure how to reply. I will protect him if Tajo is lynched and flips innocent. That's about it from this perspective.
Let's also clear up, if tajo flips scum, protect kmd, since that will pretty much confirm rofl as scum.Yosarian2 wrote:I'm making this clear to you for a reason. If you are town, I expect you to protect rofl tonight. If you are scum, then I hope that the knowlege that you will be lynched tomorrow if rofl dies may prevent you from killing him. That's also why I wanted you to specifically verify that you had heard and understood it.
This is the best reason for lynching pooky I've seen all day.VP Baltar wrote:It had occured to me that they could both be scum, especially given pooky's unwillingness to vote tajo even though he 'knows he's town'.
We lynch pooky and he flip scum, we're no longer in lynch or lose land, we have a little room to work with. In that case, we can try a "tajo hides, KMD tries to vig him" or something like that to try and test tajo.charter wrote: This is ridiculous, even if Pooky by some miracle gets lynched, and is scum, I'm still going to want tajo just as dead.
The fact that it was days ago is why I wasn't wholeheartily behind it. Now that we are right at the deadline, and all the people that will be implicated by tajo flipping scum are so vigorously trying to get pooky lynched, makes me think tajo is scum, regardless of what pooky flips.SC wrote:charter, I'm loving your style, but why so heavily behind a tajo lynch now compared to a couple of days ago when you were arguing against it? In fact, I seem to remember your vote for tajo was along the lines of 'fuck it, vote tajo'..
Role. Blocker.Yosarian2 wrote:We lynch pooky and he flip scum, we're no longer in lynch or lose land, we have a little room to work with. In that case, we can try a "tajo hides, KMD tries to vig him" or something like that to try and test tajo.charter wrote: This is ridiculous, even if Pooky by some miracle gets lynched, and is scum, I'm still going to want tajo just as dead.
Person A claims cop. He claims innocent on B, C, and D.SerialClergyman wrote: Yos2 - the logic 'I should ignore the scumminess of Yos2, rofl, charter, VP and declare them all town if I think tajo is town' is much worse than 'I should judge whether tajo is town based on whether I think it's likely that he and all the people he says must be town are town'.
There might be a scum roleblocker.charter wrote: Role. Blocker.
Ok, it is official. Tajo/rofl/yos are scum, and this was a brilliant scum gambit. Rofl's alignment is irrelevant in whether or not there is a roleblocker. If username is town, there is, if he's scum, there still could be. I'm pretty sure this is like the second time someone has made this slipup.Yosarian2 wrote:There might be a scum roleblocker.charter wrote: Role. Blocker.
The only situation in which we KNOW there would have to be a scum roleblocker is if both rofl and iamusername are town. Otherwise, we don't actually have any evidence for one.
In any case, it's a fairly safe test to run, so long as we lynch scum today first.