alvinz95 wrote:Fail.
Had a enormous case running, then some one rick rolled me causing me to exit everything out.
Will try again tomorrow, pretty pissed right now.
Snow_bunny, defend my case against you, thats all I ask for now, and DO NOT TELL ME THAT YOU ALREADY DID. If you say you did, I want you to do it again otherwise you are avoiding the question.
I VOTED WITH A REASON IF ANY OF YOU READ THE THREAD. TUBBY'S QUOTES WERE ENOUGH EXPLANATION FOR A VOTE. DO YOU REALLY WANT ME TO EXPLAIN IT?
No, they're not enough explanation for a vote. You can ask anyone, and if they answer truly, you'll get the same answer. Putting quotes as explanations for votes means that you really don't have a personal opinion on your own, but rather use other's. It's ok to follow a case posted by other player, but you at least should have a personal opinion on the matter. And, you not only did that once, but several times.
Snow_bunny has:
-ignored my posts -1
-Uses Ad Hominem -2
-Uses Strawman -3
-Ignores all questions I represent -4
-Answers questions indirectly -5
-False logic with Tubby/alvinz95/Bub -6
-Logic is pathetic "alvinz95 is the scummiest, that explains everyting" -7
-Tells me to read the thread as her answer -8
-Uses OMGUS as her excuse for everything, and yet the interpretation is incorrect. (Probably just stealing it from other people) -9
-Clings to previous argument, still claiming that it is valid, though already explained by me why it is not valid. -10
-
Lastly, GAVE A BULLSHIT ARGUMENT; still doesn't think it is bad.
-11
-Doesn't read the thread clearly, or is just ignoring it on purpose. -12
-Snow_bunny tells me to read the forum, when clearly she needs to. (hypocrisy) -13
-Snow_bunny hasn't read my case at all, or refuses to accept it, without even replying to it. -14
-Case is also based on me voting tubby "with no reason" when I clearly explained this multiple times. READ THE THREAD. -15
-Acts as if she has the upper hand falsely, though this argument is clearly in my favor. -16
1-I did not ignore your post. I read them and answered as needed. When you started going all nuts, I was already sick and I was not actively posting in the game. (btw, it was later, when I received the prod, that I posted that I was sick).
2-I quite don't understand this, and for what I read in the wiki, you're saying that I say your case is invalid because you are an ass? No. Your case was (as in, the previous one) invalid because it was based solely on an omgus attack.
3-I don't get this quite well either. I guess you are referring to the fact that I told you that I had already answered to your case when you asked. Because, if that is, I had already answered your so-called case. This one, however, I haven't.
4-This is the same as the first one.
5-What do you mean with this? Do you mean that I told you to read back the topic to find the answers for your questions? Forgive me, but I'm no maid of yours, and I believe you can read the topic by yourself and look for things I had already answered.
6-What false logic? Geez, can't you make your points clearer? If you want so much to people to respond your cases, at least make them understandable!
7-I believe this is the same than 6. And for the record, just because you don't share my same logic that doesn't mean it is pathetic. Open your mind.
8-Same as 5
9-OMGUS as I understand it: an attack/vote/etc made solely in response of a prior attack/vote/argument/etc. And that was the "hidden message" of your first case.
10-Eh? Really, make things understandable, please.
11-Like yours, eh?
12-Same as 1
13-Same as 12
14-Same as 13
15-Voting multiple times is odd. Mostly it indicates that you really don't pay attention to even what you post. Also, see 14
16-And, this matters why?
Quoting Vi in her case against me "this reads like a bad middle school essay - like you're going through the motions of convincing people that your target is scummy. " You are repeating your points all over again, and everything reduces to the same: you attacking me of not reading the topic (which is hypocrisy), and your lack of understanding that not all people share your same logic. That was your case against me? Your new case? You were making a fuss over that? At least Vi mentioned my votes and my cases, but you all resume to me not reading the topic (which lately, I couldn't) and you not seeing my logic. Well, lets at least grant you the logic point, that still only makes 2-3 points out of 16. And they're not even that strong.
Also, I've realized that most of your posts are done when you are angry. Chill down, this is just a game. Relax.
alvinz95 wrote:That case is the old. You guys are clinging to the old, scum behavior. I'm tired now, I probably drunk posted.
So, you admit you were acting scummy? Interesting. However, as it has been lately, you seem more like an angry townie than an angry scum. And thus, I'll
unvote
for now. It seems your angriness and way of play resemble more of that than angry scum. Still, I don't like you at all, and I know that you will be a liability to town in the days to come, but for now, I'll let you be. Go back to lurking, if that's what you want.
I'm still not feeling well, and I'll try to place my vote somewhere tomorrow if I'm feeling better.
Taking a long break from mafia games.
In honor of Erika Furudo, my first scum win (Umineko Mafia).
thanks for reminding me
