Just thought I should put this up while I noticed it ..
ISO:28 wrote: Vas is seeming town now
ISO:30 wrote: VV seems town. <snip> VV seems to be putting more effort into the game than most, it's silly to accuse him of active lurking. Sitting quiet while waiting for other people to post is perfectly acceptable.
ISO:32 wrote: I don't like the VV wagon at all, let's lynch SV/SV's replacement
ISO:33 wrote: The real choice is between Almaster and VV. Almaster is the better choice by far.
ISO:36 wrote: VV is very townie.
Quit trying to pretend you didn't replace a player who was the #1 suspect.
You and VV are the only two likely lynches, based on what people have said.
ISO:37 wrote: I say Vas is townie because that's my gut feel. He went to a lot of effort to read peoples meta's when he really didn't have to. I get the feeling that was genuine effort and not faked effort to look good.
See till this point I guess its fine (even though the VV focus seems a bit on the higher side) - even I had a townie read on VV right until the claim and it is not scummy to support someone who you have a townie read on.
This is the point where AlGM claims Vig and unstoppable Vig. Now, you can check this by searching through the MD forums - but the correct play for a suspicious player claiming vig (when there is no other role such as cop\doc outed) is to have that player shoot himself in the night. If he doesn't then town lynches him on D2 - this way the town gains a D1 lynch. (I'm not here to argue this - just read earlier threads on this)
However, due to partly Jack's own actions, the town was in a sort of dichotomy between VV and AlGM. So when the correct play for AlGM's claim is to leave him to kill himself, Jack panics because town would immediately take the other player's case VV. Note posts here - remember, this is before VV's claim and any "cop" role was outed. I am sure a player of Jack's experience knows that the correct play for a vig is to kill himself.
ISO 39: wrote: Scum points for ooba. You surely don't think almaster will kill himself if he's scum. But you claimed to think he was scum before. Why not keep your vote on instead of asking for the suicide? So you can get Vas to claim?
The post after the claim is a justified response if a "cop" has been outed.
ISO 41: wrote:
There is no way we should lynch VV.
Almaster is the lynch. I don't care that he's claimed vig and the "proper play with a claimed vig, yadda yadda". If you're the vig, you don't tunnel on one player because you have to figure out who you want to kill at night. Ideally you question as many people as you can. He hasn't played like a vig at all, he claimed scummy flavor, and he claimed a scummy ability.
If we let him live today he will most likely use his unstoppable kill to get through the doc protection and kill VV.
Trying to discredit the case without any points - just "silly".
ISO 42: wrote: This is absolutely silly. VV said "Role: cop, blah blah". He didn't say "Power: cop, blah blah".
Let's lynch Almaster so that he doesn't use the unstoppable kill on VV. And then we can look at ooba tomorrow. He is very likely scum as well.
Well, if it wasn't clear - I just made a post for Jack and VV being scum buddies.
IF we decide to lynch VV today (and that's a big if seeing the current traction) and when VV does turn up scum - Jack is my number one candidate for scumbuddy.