Okay, first Seraphim claims that he, daniel, and Vezopiraka were masons. Vezopiraka claimed monk and LynchMePls claimed monk as well. This is defindently confusing.
Although I am suspicious of nhammen, I think the bandwagon is going waaaaay too fast. Because of one scummy post, he's at L-2. We have over a month, let's use that to our advantage. Don't lynch him this quickly.
@The Goat: Please hurry up with your analysis. Right now, you're slightly suspicious to me. I'll give you until midnight today to get your analysis up.
@Pomegranate: I'm just responding to some things now. Analysis coming up later.
Seraphim wrote:Unvote
Vote: nhammen
lol, this is too easy. Nice catch, Parama. I retract what I said earlier about you being an idiot. 8D I hope we can be buddies now.
This is all you have to add after coming back? Another vote and an agreement with Parama? Pretty disappointing. I was hoping to see more contents out of you.
FomS: Seraphim
@nhammen (#428): We have legitimate reasons for suspecting you. If I was in your position, I would be embarrased.
LynchMePls wrote:What does this tell us: First and foremost, since no one in Seraph's group can be mafia, and no one in my group can be werewolf, and Vezo is in both, VEZO IS CONFIRMED TOWN. PLEASE STOP TRYING TO LYNCH HIM.
Actually, Vezopiraka being scum is very well possible, even as an Monk/Mason. He has a lower chance of being a scum, but it is possible. Please stop trying to denide the possibility of them being scum.
SGRaaize wrote:1) We lynch Daniel/Vezo
2) They town, oops
3) They mafia/werewolves, the other two go
Just because they are masons/monks and one of them flip scums doesn't mean all of them are scums as well. It doesn't hurt to look for connection between them, thought, if one of them do flip town.
Pomegranate wrote:So you only vote players that you are certain are scum? (The way I play, unless it's RVS or something, you vote whichever player is scummiest, even if it's not that scummy, because scummiest=more likely to be scum than any other player, at least in my book.)
Not really that certain. For example, take my vote on Parama. I unvoted him and replaced his vote with a vote on Vezopiraka. I only want to make a vote on a person when I think I can get a solid case going against that particular person. I do plan on avoiding frequently changing votes, but that doesn't mean I'm willing to change if I find another top suspect.
Vezopiraka wrote:All of you lets lynch nhammen. Every town roleblocker claim I saw was just the scum roleblocker. My vote stands.
Okay, not this early. The game started less then a week ago, so we need to give him a little more time before lynching him. When it gets reasonably close to the deadline, then I won't mind a lynch, especially not on my top suspect.
@Timeater (#482): No offense, but aside from vote Chornopie, you didn't really give us much to work on. All you did was basically summerize up the day.