and
He's not.
He was pretty scummy, got ran up to L-1, and claimed vanilla. Seemed like the day's lynch to me. No sense starting a new wagon and risking another power role being outed on Day 1. Then again, in a game with watchers, maybe that wouldn't be as serious an issue as it might be in another game. Still, not something I want to do when we have a perfectly good lynch sitting right in front of us.guy wrote:SA can you please explain why you hammered chrono so quickly
You think I've been bussing Pom for no reason?guy wrote:SA and Pom are the prime suspects here of course.
Sweet. Confirmed town barring a guy scumflip at some point. Or a hider flip from anyone else.guy wrote:last night I hid behind Thief. So he's confirmed as clean
What's wrong with that? If I think someone is scummy, I want them lynched. If I want them lynched, damn right I want to start a wagon.Pom wrote:It seemed like you wanted to start a wagon; I think that that's what's being referred to.
0_oguy wrote:Also, can we talk about SA please? We need him to explain his premature ejaculation
Way to show up when your name gets called into attention.Empking, 162 wrote:Guy0, you should claim. We've got watchers, they're not going to get killed.
Vote: Beloved Princess
This bothers me. Trying to cast doubt on a cleared townie seems like a scummy action to take.Sleepless Assassin, 177 wrote:Sweet. Confirmed town barring a guy scumflip at some point. Or a hider flip from anyone else.
You mean "way to show up when the thread is opened for a new day" right?ConfidAnon wrote:Way to show up when your name gets called into attention.Empking, 162 wrote:Guy0, you should claim. We've got watchers, they're not going to get killed.
Vote: Beloved Princess
This looks like a major scumslip.SA wrote:You think I've been bussing Pom for no reason?
It's not.Confid wrote:This bothers me. Trying to cast doubt on a cleared townie seems like a scummy action to take.
Is also a horrible reason to vote put someone at L-1.This bothers me. Trying to cast doubt on a cleared townie seems like a scummy action to take.
What do you mean by this?Thief wrote:So you just outed yourselfwithout even putting a possible Watcher at L-1.
It obviously wasn't the only reason - the hammer and the Pom case also contributed to that. I just didn't feel the need to restate what others had said.Thief wrote:Confid, as confirmed town I command you to unvote Sleepless Assassin. I don't want someone at L-1 with so many V/LAs and people who haven't posted yet.Is also a horrible reason to vote put someone at L-1.This bothers me. Trying to cast doubt on a cleared townie seems like a scummy action to take.
You putting him at L-1 while saying "well I'll get to Primate later tonight" rings of distancing in my mind while trying to force another claim out of town.
Unvote:
Vote: ConfidAnon
Primate+CA+NEEDMOARINFO
1. It's possible. Unlikely, but possible.guy wrote:1. No one has mentioned the possibility of me lying about hider at this point, because counterclaiming hider would have been a pure pro-town choice. If anyone counter-claimed hider at this point it would be a very scummy move since they didn't do it at d1. The fact that you're telling everyone that me and thief could still be scum worries me a lot.
2. It was, evidently, not a good lynch, so what you said is meaningless.
3. Your joke was not funny
I explained the Pom vote yesterday.Thief wrote:SA you better explain your Pom case and your other suspects quickly or my vote will wind up right back on you.
Pretty sure that is the exact opposite of what I was saying. I just said that Theif was confirmed barring the chance that guy is lying. Meaning that is the ONLY way Theif can be scum. Meaning we treat Thief as confirmed town unless we find out guy was lying. Which we haven't. So anyone voting Theif at all today is scum/retarded.Confid wrote:This bothers me. Trying to cast doubt on a cleared townie seems like a scummy action to take.
No.Beloved wrote:This looks like a major scumslip.
Because it is the only possible way that Theif isn't town. I said he is confirmed town unless guy is lying. Basically, chances that Theif isn't town are extremely low because:Empking wrote:SA: Why spend time saying in case guy is lying, when you don't (or anyone else does) think there's much chance of him lying?
So what was the point of bringing all this common sense up?Sleepless Assassin, 192 wrote:Because it is the only possible way that Theif isn't town. I said he is confirmed town unless guy is lying. Basically, chances that Theif isn't town are extremely low because:
-Guy would have to be lying scum (unlikely)
AND
-He would have had to claim an innocent on his buddy rather than a townie.
OR
-Guy would have to be lying town (unlikely).
So basically Theif is about 95% confirmed as town.
Just an afterthought. My mind went like "oh sweet, confirmed town unless blah blah", so that's what I posted.ConfidAnon wrote: So what was the point of bringing all this common sense up?
I realize this. That's why I was kind of confused when a few people started asking about it.Confid wrote:I'm pretty sure everyone in the game realized this, and realized how unlikely this is. No offense, but it's not a groundbreaking revelation.
Again, exact opposite of what I was saying.Confid wrote:The way you said this sounds like you were trying to reduce the number of confirmeds we have.
Hmmm I'm wondering is this is slight role fishing or not.Thief wrote:
So you just outed yourself without even putting a possible Watcher at L-1.
What do you mean by this?