because he's the only person I'm pretty much sure is town and considering no-one has asked me to my opinion on him and there isn't really much suspicion going that way there isn't much point posting my thoughts on him here.
These are unedited in current form, so I imagine you'll have questions or want me to expand on points, just ask.
Beloved Princess.
#44 Votes Guy0 when it looks like he was a promising wagon.
#72 Bit hypocritical given selfs lack of activity. Thief read similar to mine.
#102: Comments on speed of guy wagon, purposefully implying thoughtfulness without proving existence. Opinion on people not voting obvious and incorrect.
#182: Suspicion of SA unwarranted. Like the defense against CA's SA move. Dislike Apprehension of going against the towns majority. Also think the move against CA is odd.
#203: Not voting tell odd to rely on with one big wagon. Missing point of what tell could theoretically be there if at all exists. Speculation on guy wagon is chatter.
#206: Move in defense of Pom interesting because casual and no real reason for it.
Confidanon
#51: Makes sense. Legit but eh point on Guy, fine for early though.
#55: Like turn on guy.
#88: Good.
#98: Agree.
#139: Legitimate.
#161: Weak.
#180: Like Cheap Dig on Emp. SA Conduct Makes sense.
#183-187: Anoyance at unstated obviousness scummy.
Empking
#75: Was weird, suspecting a top two that are attacking each other.
#86: Answer doesn't really answer.
#94: Dislike it in retrospect because it's a gut opinion that was wrong.
#162: Interesting. Assuming lurkervote, moving lurker frustration onto runnoff lurkertarget, not remedying or apologising for lurkerproblem.
#210: Lazy and scummy. Moving in direction of general town mood with general non-specific reasons.
#221: Nonsensical.
Pom
#43: Interesting. Artificial responsibility.
#96 (Plum): Dislike Attitude to scenario, looking at what to do to minimise possible attacks.
#112: Note the fact that she assumed Guy0 was active lurking and wasn't voting him.
#143-145: In #11 Pom complains about chrono putting guy0 at -1 without reason then uses this as her only stated reason to put chrono at -1. Also emphasizes -1 status, divesting responsibility of lynch.
#168: Gut dislike of responding to nightkill targets in the morning, unsure why. Like Questioning Guy0 about targets, scum wouldn't be that obvious. Possibly trying to dissaude Guy0 from not hiding by not mentioning, but that's a slight stretch.
Sleeping Assassin
#66: Dislike always post smiley thing, feels bad-overdefensive. Like Hypo-call. Legit point against Pom for not voting me.
#89: Like his honesty in admitting he couldn't remember his point.
#114: Good Omgus Call. Hand of suspicion in particular.
#150: Legit partner points. Like watcher call. Chrono vote is tarded, but people do really stupid things around VT claims, so pinch of salt there.
#157: Like vote start into day.
#177. Don't like divestment of responsibility of chrono lynch, and that explanation feels really constructed. Rightfully swats down Pom-SA link. Something I'm missing about this post maybe. Sets my gut off.
#195: Dislike backing off on afterthought.
#219: Gut dislikes this one as well.
I'll digest this for a while then come back with a vote I can stand by with backup soon. Two minor things are that 3 of the above 5 need to be scum in my book, but I like to avoid acting on partnership tells in a meaningful way before have one because it's a really nasty way of getting on the wrong track.
Secondly and more importantly, unless we hit scum today, Guy0 shouldn't target anyone. This may be obvious, but I haven't seen anyone mention it.
