NY 114: Mafia vs. Werewolves (Game Over)

[LimMePls]

If you even bother to look at the time stamps you'd know it wasn't immediate >.< I can read pretty fast, but hell to the freaking no can I read that many pages in a *Snap* like that... It was a hour or two.

Stop saying I immediately jumped on it because of my first post being my vote on him.

THAT

is stupid. Sorry~

So you couldn't do the reread during the night like I did? You had to wait for day 2 to start to do a reread? Why is that, where you busy in the night time? If so, with what?

[LimMePls]

That said, I'd really like Shrinehime to answer to the charges leveled at Sevis.

um.

Q:

Why have we waited until Sevis is unable to defend himself to suddenly bring up these accusations?

It's terribly convenient.

R U JK? Read my ISO, I've asked Sevis plenty of questions. We were waiting for you because he stopped posting.

Unvote
Vote: Shrinehme

[Socrates]

That said, I'd really like Shrinehime to answer to the charges leveled at Sevis.

um.

Q:

Why have we waited until Sevis is unable to defend himself to suddenly bring up these accusations?

It's terribly convenient.

'cause I only replaced in myself on tuesday and only just now got around to looking at your player slot. If I had been sitting on this case to deploy at the right time, wouldn't it have been better to do it while Sevis was AWOL and being replaced?

[Shrinehme]

Oh I see.

And you expect me to be able to jump and be able to explain everything I did as if I were him?

All I have is the role. I don't have him whispering in my ear.

Fishy thing to hold me to, IMO.

I agree that both posts that Socrates quoted are scummy. I don't have a defense, sorry.

[foilist13]

@SSBF: Why isn't leafsnail on your suspect list? You put up 10 people without mentioning the person you went after line 1 of your post. I am confused by this.

RE: Pomegranite: Only time's I've played with pomegranite she completely ignored D1, and tended to lurk D2. This is a common pattern with her, which unfortunately means we have no content or meta leaning either way. This is distinctly anti-town, but not necessarily scummy.

@Socrates: Do you intend to let shrinehime defend himself, or are you of the opinion that he cannot know what Sevis was thinking and therefore can't defend himself and should be lynched anyway?

[Socrates]

@Socrates: Do you intend to let shrinehime defend himself, or are you of the opinion that he cannot know what Sevis was thinking and therefore can't defend himself and should be lynched anyway?

Shrine is welcome to do whatever he can to defend himself, but Sevis already had apparently gotten called out for his actions, tried to defend himself, failed miserably, and then flaked off the site.

I haven't been this sure of a read in a long time. You should vote Shrine.

[Super Smash Bros. Fan]

@SSBF: Why isn't leafsnail on your suspect list? You put up 10 people without mentioning the person you went after line 1 of your post. I am confused by this.

I currently have a null read on Leafsnail. It takes me a while to put a person on my suspect list. I am willing to put him up on the suspect list if he continues to get worse, but not right now.

[Lowell]

So, to summarize, socrates replaces some idiot and we're all like "ooo, poor socrates, let's stop voting him!", then shrine replaces some idiot and we're all like "yeah, let's vote the new guy!", despite the obviousness of socrates being scum. Really? Thank god I skipped the foilist wagon-drama entirely.

[Pomegranate]

I'm happy to see a wagon forming on Sevis. Thank you Socrates.

--

RE: Pomegranite: Only time's I've played with pomegranite she completely ignored D1, and tended to lurk D2. This is a common pattern with her, which unfortunately means we have no content or meta leaning either way. This is distinctly anti-town, but not necessarily scummy.

I seem to recall a mini game I played with you, with me as scum. Is this what you're referring to?

--

Catching up now.

[foilist13]

I think so. I don't believe I survived long enough to find out your alignment.

[Pomegranate]

Pages 46, 47, 48

Well SSBF and nhammen are still scum but we can't lynch all of you can we?

Why SSBF?

--

I think roleblocker is a fairly unlikely role for town to have. I also don't like the way nhammen gave his report and instantly voted SGR.

While I don't agree about roleblocker being a fairly unlikely role for town to have, I do agree that nhammen was way to aggresive with his vote on SGR. Almost like he was desperate to put the attention anywhere other than on himself.

nhammen didn't even consider for a moment that there could be other reasons for one less kill.

I agree with LMP here. Bolded is scummy of nhammen.

--

FOS: Sevis

[..] I'd really like to hear from Sevis or his replacement.

Is there any other reason for your FoS?

--

Addendum to the previous: He could also be a mason/werewolf with lynchmepls, but that is equally unlikely

I don't like this post- vezo is basically confirmed, and there was no need to add that to your explanation IMO.

--

Of everyone in this game, I am the worst possible lynch for those reasons.

[/quote]

Liar

--

No, I didn't see them. I quoted the same post, so what? I am a selective reader. And I answered them now. Your argument is completely ridiculous.

Really, how could you know what I do or don't read? <_<

This is pretty simple.

Either you're dodging questions and lying about it, which is scummy. Or you're very selectively reading posts which implies you're more interested in creating scum than finding scum, which is even scummier.

I have to say that sometimes I skim really long post, maybe look for a tl;dr at the bottom. So while maybe he ought to be reading more carefully, I don't find it

that

scummy.

--

Okay I give. Foilist is in fact scummy. But soc is still the play. I'll take the known (a roleblock followed by missing kill

) over scummy behavior (being as I am someone who tends to "look scummy" all the time).

The votes on nhammen and parama are stupid though.

Explain why Soc is scummy, please.

--

More later, hopefully.

[Dr. Robotnik]

So, to summarize, socrates replaces some idiot and we're all like "ooo, poor socrates, let's stop voting him!", then shrine replaces some idiot and we're all like "yeah, let's vote the new guy!", despite the obviousness of socrates being scum. Really? Thank god I skipped the foilist wagon-drama entirely.

Why do those two subs make it good that you skipped a wagon that had nothing to do with them?

[Timeater]

@leaf

I dont consider getting angry and using ad-hom attacks a scumtell. I consider it getting angry. And yes, we are scum buddies. You caught us. Yep, you got it right. Bah! Better luck next game, I guess.

Also, people who have yet to state their top three scumspects:

Animorpherv1
Faraday
Nachomamma8
Nikanor
Pomegranate
SerialClergyman
Shrinehme

I ain't askin alot, people.

@nacho

What gives you ignore my question and go for a contentless vote on nhammen. Y u do dis?

So, to summarize, socrates replaces some idiot and we're all like "ooo, poor socrates, let's stop voting him!", then shrine replaces some idiot and we're all like "yeah, let's vote the new guy!", despite the obviousness of socrates being scum. Really? Thank god I skipped the foilist wagon-drama entirely.

Or they could BOTH be scum.

[Nachomamma8]

What gives you ignore my question and go for a contentless vote on nhammen. Y u do dis?

ya i ignore u questshun cuz it suck and i alredy fond scum nhammen and askbob, with a socrates scum on the other team.

nd i dnt c y votin scum iz bad or contentless?

[Super Smash Bros. Fan]

What gives you ignore my question and go for a contentless vote on nhammen. Y u do dis?

ya i ignore u questshun cuz it suck and i alredy fond scum nhammen and askbob, with a socrates scum on the other team.

nd i dnt c y votin scum iz bad or contentless?

This posts made absolutely no sense whatsoever and I'm calling foul on it. If he keeps posting like this, I might as well be his English Correction Translation (Not that I want to do it (I don't) and kill him off later on if he doesn't improve.

Yes, I ignored your question because it sucks and I have already found nhammen and askbob to be scums, with Socrates being scum on the other team.

No I don't see you voting for these scums, which is either bad or not producing contents.

[foilist13]

I'm pretty sure that's not what the second line said, but I honestly don't care that much. I've played with nacho before and I recall him having much better logic and english. I don't know what his deal is here

[Super Smash Bros. Fan]

I'm pretty sure that's not what the second line said, but I honestly don't care that much. I've played with nacho before and I recall him having much better logic and english. I don't know what his deal is here

Same with me. I thought he was a fantastic player in my first game here (Newbie 934, he was my IC, got killed off Night 1, but still proves my point), so I'm not sure why the sudden change either. For now, lets assume these possibilities:

1. He's making these posts to rest assure he's still around and has a big post coming up.

2. He's caught up, but not really willing to share his honest thoughts.

3. He's a Jester (Unlikely, but still possible as Mini Normal games have had Jesters before).

[SerialClergyman]

I've told you my thoughts on your three suspects question, and I've told you why it's not helpful. Having my name is large letters bolded won't change the fact that there are too many individuals that I could pick from. Right now my top suspect is nhammen, Socrates comes in at second and I don't particularly care about the rest.

Pom - how could you miss Lowell's reasoning for why he wants a Soc lynch? He's been talking about nothing else all day, and fair enough too.

[SerialClergyman]

Also - don't even think about jesters. They aren't worth it. They're designed to be lynched, so just lynch people if they're outrageously deserving of it and if they are a jester then shrug and get on with the game. You can't second guess that sort of read.

I'd suggest Nacho is speaking in that manner as a vague attempt to mock some others in thread, but I could be wrong.

It's also pretty obvious his motivation for his vote - questioning why someone votes the guy who got blocked when there was no kill is only likely to get you a well, duh! answer.

[Shrinehme]

Shrinehme

um.

well.

I gave suspects.

Not fully informed, but I'm making sure my stances are out there.

[Socrates]

Serial really needs that cop investigation.

[Midnight's Sorrow]

If you even bother to look at the time stamps you'd know it wasn't immediate >.< I can read pretty fast, but hell to the freaking no can I read that many pages in a *Snap* like that... It was a hour or two.

Stop saying I immediately jumped on it because of my first post being my vote on him.

THAT

is stupid. Sorry~

So you couldn't do the reread during the night like I did? You had to wait for day 2 to start to do a reread? Why is that, where you busy in the night time? If so, with what?

Listen dude. I reread after every night phase is over, especially over those who've died be they town or scum, to see what I can see with out the ambiguity of their role floating around like a f-ing cloud of doom .-. I usually don't pay much attention when the thread is locked anyways, especially if I have other active games going on, so your attempt to pin something outrageous on me is dully noted . ktksbai~

@SSBF:

It should be obvious that nacho was only mock anwsering to a question that held the same lingo. There's nothing scummy about how he phrased his answer. get out of Town~

[SerialClergyman]

I could certainly use a cop investigation - would help me clear up this nhammen mess.

Unless you meant ON me, which would be less good.

Perhaps you can help me, Soc, you're a clever chicken - who's town at the moment?

[LimMePls]

Alright, I'm officially not continuing this discussion with MS anymore. If you guys can't see the scum by now, then I don't know what else to say. He is either VI or scum.

Serial really needs that cop investigation.

Explain please?

[Midnight's Sorrow]

Coward.

You and leaf both.