Parama wrote:Do it.
Midnight's Sorrow
: This guy. The fact that he has over 200 posts does not indicate a town read obviously. The vast majority of his post has been fluff after fluff after fluff. When called upon by Leafsnail and recived pressure on Day 2, Midnight's Sorrow did pretty badly under pressure. His responses were very poorly formed and sound absoutely ignorant to any criticism. I absolutely
fail
to see why I am scummy by his perspective, especially since I have done a lot more then he has overall and I have less then 150 posts overall. I'm actually surprised a large bandwagon hasn't stayed stable on him because he is deserving of it. People seriously need to take a second look at his ISO. I will be extremely disappointed if he isn't dead by Day 5. Yes, this is just a summary of him.
SGRaaize/Socrates
: Obviously, there are strong evidence indicating that the slot is scum. I don't take it as proof, but it is something to note. SGRaaize claims to be defensive, but didn't really defend himself well. He emphazied way too much on quotes that made his posts longer then necessary. Socrates Day 2 play wasn't bad, but the quality of his play took a dive Day 3. He didn't defend himself very well and actually gave up, which is very annoying and anti-townie. Saying that "he might be town" gives him some scum points and I also didn't like how he declared himself to be an obvious townie when his behavior exhibits the opposite.
Lowell
: If anyone is an active lurker, it's Lowell. Most of his posts doesn't have the satisfactory amount of contributations in it, only once in a blue moon will we see them. His admitted refusal to contribute under any circumstances is definently noted and I'm surprise not that many more people actually catch on to it. I'm keeping him under close watch and I suggest people do as well.
Dr. Robotnik
: Also guilty of active lurking. His defense against Nachomamma8's case is poor at best, scummy at worst. Here he called me suspicious:
Dr. Robotnik wrote:I do find it suspicious that SSBF says he finds four people scummy, including Socrates, but won't vote for him unless A) He's close to being lynched (Which he is) or B) A bandwagon against anyone else doesn't form (Unsight has a little one, but Socrates still dwarves that one). I'm wondering why SSBF is still pushing for MS or myself, where we have a much better chance evidence wise of getting scum by lynching Socrates.
When I made a rebuttal to that comment, he immediately stopped. No further pressure pushed onto me. Combine that with Nachomamma8's case and you have a very scummy player.
Parama
: My suspicion on Parama never really went away. Sure he has made some good points, and thus, I have yet to vote him again, but he isn't entirely clear. I agree with other people in where I despise that he declares a person scummy beyond any doubt and then lose focus on them. The majority of my original case on Parama still stands. He's not as scummy as other people here, but he is still worth mentioning.
askbob/CryMeARiver/furcolow
: Another slot that is pretty scummy. askbob played pretty badly Day 2 before replacing out and looking back, his Day 1 play wasn't the greatest either. Like Dr. Robotnik, he put an unecessary amount of focus on regarding discussions of masons. I agree that he put too much focus on lurker hunting. CryMeARiver did
absolutely nothing
contributive in this game. He promised contents, but didn't deliever on them. We'll see about furcolow.
