my vote was real the firrst time, now you've mis repped and contradicted yourself. If your first vote was random why did you give a reason?Elleran wrote:UNVOTE: drmyshottyizsik
VOTE: drmyshottyizsik for real. Overreacting to a random vote on him.
Mini 1088: Cookie Thief Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
drmyshottyizsik Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: July 2, 2010
- Location: Under A Bus
-
-
Elleran Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 716
- Joined: May 9, 2010
-
-
drmyshottyizsik Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: July 2, 2010
- Location: Under A Bus
-
-
Stigmata Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 155
- Joined: August 31, 2010
-
-
Elleran Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 716
- Joined: May 9, 2010
@drmyshottyizsik: Still nope.
Making a counterargument against your comment on my vote was fine. I simply provided an evidence that was from my past post. You can call it back pedaling if you want, but it's also possible that you took 'wagon' in quote marks too literally.
@Stigmata: Hmm.. You're right. "Sarcasm" was the wrong word. The intention of the quote marks were to show that I was being unrealistic. I voted shotty the second time with more seriousness for overreaction.Helloran Elleran-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
drmyshottyizsik Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: July 2, 2010
- Location: Under A Bus
-
-
Elleran Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 716
- Joined: May 9, 2010
It wasn't serious. Sorry to disappoint you guys.
Were you guys really expecting anyone to vote someone seriously within the first page when the average number of posts posted by each person was nearly 0? I did not have enough information. Far from it. Even the vote that I have proposed the second time isn't strong. My shotty vote remains because I have a reason to keep it there. Unless another evidence that I can work with arises, my vote isn't moving.Helloran Elleran-
-
drmyshottyizsik Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: July 2, 2010
- Location: Under A Bus
-
-
Elleran Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 716
- Joined: May 9, 2010
-
-
drmyshottyizsik Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6872
- Joined: July 2, 2010
- Location: Under A Bus
-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
drmyshottyizsik wrote:no but this arguement got us out of rvs
What is this mythical conceptual abstraction you call the rvs and why do you think we have magically stepped out of it's boundaries?Elleran wrote:That's fine. I dislike RVS. Too little information is really given off.
I'm almost convinced of your innocence, drmyshottyizsik. Only a scum would want to extend RVS. Getting out of RVS is critical if we want to make the most of the time we have.-
-
Llamarble Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3582
- Joined: May 2, 2010
VOTE: Elleran
Elleran's "I'm almost convinced you're town" is ridiculous at this stage and handing out town reads only helps scum.
It also contradicts his "I'm keeping my vote on you because I have a reason to" a post earlier.
If Elleran believes Shotty is innocent then he doesn't have a reason to keep his vote there.
Scum forget what they're pretending to believe about other players because they don't actually believe it.
Telling Shotty he looks innocent is also buddying.
Drmyshottyizsik is another strong possibility, or perhaps a scumbuddy.
He's seeking towncred for getting us out of RVS when such has not yet happened.
The two of them may have planned having a silly argument and claiming getoutofrvs towncred during scum pregame talk.-
-
Darox Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2970
- Joined: May 10, 2008
- Location: The Future
-
-
lewarcher82 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: September 2, 2009
Elleran looks like a VI to me.
I agree that the "I am almost convinced you're town" is ridicuolous at this stage, but how is your detailed analysis of scumteams any better?Llamarble wrote:VOTE: Elleran
Elleran's "I'm almost convinced you're town" is ridiculous at this stage and handing out town reads only helps scum.
It also contradicts his "I'm keeping my vote on you because I have a reason to" a post earlier.
If Elleran believes Shotty is innocent then he doesn't have a reason to keep his vote there.
Scum forget what they're pretending to believe about other players because they don't actually believe it.
Telling Shotty he looks innocent is also buddying.
Drmyshottyizsik is another strong possibility, or perhaps a scumbuddy.
He's seeking towncred for getting us out of RVS when such has not yet happened.
The two of them may have planned having a silly argument and claiming getoutofrvs towncred during scum pregame talk.Used to play a lot, haven't played for like 8 years, would like to play again.-
-
RobCapone Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1451
- Joined: October 29, 2010
drmyshottyizsik wrote:i was the first vote and this is RVS you're dumb
unvote
vote elleran
for misrepping me
so which is it shotty, either it was RVS or it was real, can't be both.drmyshottyizsik wrote:
my vote was real the firrst time, now you've mis repped and contradicted yourself. If your first vote was random why did you give a reason?Elleran wrote:UNVOTE: drmyshottyizsik
VOTE: drmyshottyizsik for real. Overreacting to a random vote on him.Goodbye Mafiascum, you guys too serious for me.-
-
lewarcher82 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: September 2, 2009
pay closer attention, you missed something.RobCapone wrote:drmyshottyizsik wrote:i was the first vote and this is RVS you're dumb
unvote
vote elleran
for misrepping me
so which is it shotty, either it was RVS or it was real, can't be both.drmyshottyizsik wrote:
my vote was real the firrst time, now you've mis repped and contradicted yourself. If your first vote was random why did you give a reason?Elleran wrote:UNVOTE: drmyshottyizsik
VOTE: drmyshottyizsik for real. Overreacting to a random vote on him.Used to play a lot, haven't played for like 8 years, would like to play again.-
-
RobCapone Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1451
- Joined: October 29, 2010
-
-
lewarcher82 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: September 2, 2009
-
-
Kublai Khan Khan Man
- Khan Man
- Khan Man
- Posts: 5278
- Joined: August 5, 2008
- Location: Sarasota, FL
2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark:Stigmata wrote:vote Elleran
I don't think sarcasm is the word you are looking for. Why did you vote him?dictionary.com wrote: sarcasm
noun
1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.a review full of sarcasms.
It was obviously a flippantly sarcastic taunt. It was in quotes. Why did you consider it worthy of a vote?
--
@Elleran: unvoting, then revoting the same person isn't an overreaction in itself?
--
On a scale of 1-10 (10 being really strongly): how strongly do you believe this actually happened?Llamarble wrote:The two of them may have planned having a silly argument and claiming getoutofrvs towncred during scum pregame talk.Occasionally intellectually honest
Black Lives Matter
Get vaccinated-
-
RobCapone Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1451
- Joined: October 29, 2010
-
-
lewarcher82 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: September 2, 2009
sidenote: trying to get out of rvs is not a towntell. It is a nulltell.
mod: I find it very nice when mods put the votecount (updated to page n-1) in the first post of page n, is it possible?
I like it too, but unfortunately, I don't know how it's done. I'll try to update VC as often as possible.Last edited by FakeGod on Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.Used to play a lot, haven't played for like 8 years, would like to play again.-
-
PoisonIvy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 176
- Joined: December 24, 2009
Oh hai thur
- WRONG!!! Shotsick was ACTUALLY the first person voted under the exact same statement.Elleran wrote:VOTE: drmyshottyizsik for trying to start a "wagon".
-When he pointed out your contradiction.Elleran wrote:VOTE: drmyshottyizsik for real. Overreacting to a random vote on him.
- this is dealt with in RECAP.Elleran wrote:It wasn't a reason. It was sarcasm the first time. I put wagon in quotes for that purpose.
So no, I did not contradict myself.
- Comprimising, will to accept other peoples point of view but still claiming she is right and pointing out that there is a possibility of her being misinterpretted when she firstly misinterpretted the WHOLE thing ie. shotsick trying to start a wagon. Why not picked up andrew? Did you read the game at all?Making a counterargument against your comment on my vote was fine. I simply provided an evidence that was from my past post. You can call it back pedaling if you want, but it's also possible that you took 'wagon' in quote marks too literally.
- Sounded pretty srs. Srsly.Elleran wrote:It wasn't serious. Sorry to disappoint you guys.
- comprimising. But willing to change her vote.Elleran wrote:My shotty vote remains because I have a reason to keep it there. Unless another evidence that I can work with arises, my vote isn't moving.
LESS THAN A PAGE LATER!!!!!!!!
- So what happened to this other piece of evidence you were waiting on? Also many people, scum and town say that. Why are you suddenly under the illusion he's town because of his words? Perhaps you are too eager to swallow them.I'm almost convinced of your innocence, drmyshottyizsik. Only a scum would want to extend RVS. Getting out of RVS is critical if we want to make the most of the time we have.
RECAP. We either have mafia or a serial VI who cant read to see that shotsick was voted first and voted him for trying to start a "wagon". Even under the use of sarcasm, a "wagon" is what i would use if someone was attempting to start a wagon, but no one was taking the bait. FYI im one of these people who believes long term idiots are not good for town, even if they are indeed town. Its best to get rid of them early. They are easily persuaded to be loyal to one party, mafia or town and very stubborn to admit mistakes. See: backpedalling and the whole "I have a reason for my vote" vs. "It wasnt serious but im still not moving my vote" and now the "i believe you are almost completely innocent" gag. Sense this does not make to me.
Unvote, Vote Elleran
((And i am purposely refusing to call you that name shotsick))Queen Of Clubs.-
-
lewarcher82 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: September 2, 2009
I am absolutely convinced that the whole starting-a-wagon stuff was a joke. I do not get scumvibes by Elleran, and I do not get scumvibes by Shotstick either (guess it's your new name, dude).PoisonIvy wrote:Oh hai thur
- WRONG!!! Shotsick was ACTUALLY the first person voted under the exact same statement.Elleran wrote:VOTE: drmyshottyizsik for trying to start a "wagon".
I do get some from Llamabrble #37... he seems to be deducing a lot of stuff from a nulltelling situation. It is ridiculous for Elleran to be convinced that Shotstick is town, but it is allright for him to speculate on scumtalk in pregame and scumteams with scumstrategies?
This may be an hyperinterpretation, but it may also be scum jumping on a VI. A vote on his head won't hurt.
unvote; vote: LlamarbleUsed to play a lot, haven't played for like 8 years, would like to play again.-
-
FakeGod Seven-Colored Puppeteer
- Seven-Colored Puppeteer
- Seven-Colored Puppeteer
- Posts: 9718
- Joined: March 17, 2010
- Location: Bad Player Jail
VoteCount 1.1
drmyshottyizsik (2): andrew94, Elleran
RobCapone (1): Kublai Khan
Darox (2): Zed, Llarmarble
Zed (1): RobCapone
Elleran (4): drmyshottyizsik, Stigmata, Llamarble, PoisonIvy
Llarmarble (1): lewarcher82
Not voting: Darox
With 12 people alive, town needs 7 votes to lynch someone.My favorite site mod is Zor Tester.
I have Brandi's autograph! I bet you're jealous.
Send me a PM if you want to replace in!
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.