Mini 1088: Cookie Thief Mafia (Game Over)

[Furcolow]

i also have a claim
if someones cookie is eaten, i lose my vote for a day, so i should probably be killed before lylo in case mafia kill the other person

[Furcolow]

a specific someone

[RobCapone]

ok
i believe you rob

unvote;
vote: hungryharold/drshottyizsick

you need to make up your mind that is atleast twice you have flipped flopped on me

[Furcolow]

i was testing you after the shady holding back of the claim

[RobCapone]

yeah going to bed is shady

[don_johnson]

that actually depends on

who

you're going to bed with.

i need to give this entire thread a good reread. should be able to this weekend and post some thoughts on sunday...

[FakeGod]

Vote Count 2.2

Furcolow (1): Elleran
Darox (2): Llamarble, drmyshottyizsik
drmyshottyizsik (2): Darox, Furcolow

Not Voting: andrew94, Zed, don_johnson, RobCapone, lewarcher82

With 10 players, it takes 6 votes to lynch someone.

[Zed]

I do wonder about the ban choice. Tomorrow I'd like to look at Kublai's posts to see if anyone had a good enough reason to get rid of him.

Did it ever occur to anyone that both Furc and Rob could be scum? While it is unlikely now, since it looked like Furc was trying to set up Rob for a lynch once the day started. This makes me wonder if he is just playing us all, and he's the scum of the group. But Furc has already lead the wagon on an innocent, and I don't plan to vote with him again, for now, unless there is overwhelming evidence against someone.

The deal was town was going to lead us who to choose and 2 people chose shotty so that is why we went with shotty.

Why would you take the advice of the whole town? There are town members who don't want innocents to win - innocents that your investigation is supposed to benefit. The only reason I can see you taking the advice of town members is if you know their alignment, and how many people know other town member's alignment?

Hungry Harold is what shotty's name is

You only got his name, not his alignment?

I'm not really interested in lynching Darox right now. He seems too bold to be scum, but you never know. He just isn't at the top of my list.

I'll decide if I want to vote shotty when I see his fullclaim. I really don't udnerstand why he had to ask. Trying to think something good up?

[Darox]

Have you ever wondered that perhaps I'm bold because I'm Darox?

Just curious.

[Elleran]

@Furcolow: Why would you believe Rob at all if you "know" that he's a scum? Why not just maintain a vote on him? Your move does not make sense.

[Llamarble]

Hungry Harold does sound scummy.
I can't really think of anything scummier than that except Malicious Mike or Bad Ben or something.

Unvote; VOTE DRSHOT

Darox's play is scummy, but this is hard evidence.
Of course Rob could be lying about Shotty's name, but 1 for 1 mislynch for lynch isn't horrible for us.
That's vote L-3 I believe.

[lewarcher82]

Have you ever wondered that perhaps I'm bold because I'm Darox?

Just curious.

Ok, this is how it works. You do something brilliant and THEN you start being bold and self-confident. For now, you are just being useless.

@Zed: well, yeah, it is possible... so you think there was only one town aligned player in the GC - the one whose lynch I pushed - and the other two are scum... definitely possibile, why not? Actually, the two attempts by furco at lynching rob never became bw's... I can only say I hope this is not the case...

@Rob: should we lynch Hungry Harold?

@furco's new claim: omfg,

I sure hope this setup was reviewed by someone.

No worries. The setup was reviewed by more than one person on this site. -mod

[Furcolow]

@Furcolow: Why would you believe Rob at all if you "know" that he's a scum? Why not just maintain a vote on him? Your move does not make sense.

excuse me?
if i have ever made bold speculation, so be it, but don't try to defend your vote with piss-poor questioning...
do you really expect to catch scum with this question?
it doesn't feel like it.

[Darox]

Have you ever wondered that perhaps I'm bold because I'm Darox?

Just curious.

Ok, this is how it works. You do something brilliant and THEN you start being bold and self-confident. For now, you are just being useless.

@Zed: well, yeah, it is possible... so you think there was only one town aligned player in the GC - the one whose lynch I pushed - and the other two are scum... definitely possibile, why not? Actually, the two attempts by furco at lynching rob never became bw's... I can only say I hope this is not the case...

@Rob: should we lynch Hungry Harold?

@furco's new claim: omfg,

I sure hope this setup was reviewed by someone.

You keep being meek and filled with self doubt, and I'll be waiting for when you do something brilliant like that. In the mean time, I'll keep being awesome.


Furcolow: What's the flavour justification for you losing your vote?

[lewarcher82]

sure, Darox, sure.

@furco: you did change your mind like 100 times about rob. Please, now concentrate on Shot, summon your best grammar-skills and post your opinion about the half-case we are discussing.

[Darox]

@furco: you did change your mind like 100 times about rob. Please, now concentrate on Shot, summon your best grammar-skills and post your opinion about the half-case we are discussing.

Wow, what a fucking waste of time!

Tell us the flavour justification for why you lose your vote instead. It'd be more productive than repeating the same 2 sentences again.

[RobCapone]

@zed. You don't get to be inactive and miss all discussions and than criticize who we used our action on, until you post regularly you have no position in this game. It was mentioned that our target was chosen, shotty was the one mentioned and nobody objected

Now if you fucking read you would see I suggested other names to furc but he chose shotty, I had no choice to go along because if I voted somebody else we stalemate and furc would be in here trying to throw me under the bus

Also Zed we only get name, if you were paying attention you would have known that. This is why I hate lurkers with a passion and if zed is alive at lylo she is costing the game, she has cost town game before


Yes I think we should lynch shotty at whoever asked, hungry harry sounds like scum to me

[andrew94]

shotty has yet to answer my question + full claim


waiting on fake claim per haps?

[andrew94]

v/la starting on 25th of dec for 4 days

hong kong = =

Noted. Have fun! -mod

[drmyshottyizsik]

I threatened to eat my cookie because I was bored with this game, but my full role claim is a Cookie Scout, and I have a secondary role as a suicidal cookie eater. If I say a certian rendition of the word nom om om in a certian order I will eat my own cookie. This is pro town because incase I was going to be lynch I could eat my cookie, and not give the mafia an extra nk.

[RobCapone]

so if you eat your cookie, mafia can;t NK?

[Elleran]

@Furcolow: Why would you believe Rob at all if you "know" that he's a scum? Why not just maintain a vote on him? Your move does not make sense.

excuse me?
if i have ever made bold speculation, so be it, but don't try to defend your vote with piss-poor questioning...
do you really expect to catch scum with this question?
it doesn't feel like it.

I want a good answer to my question because I have suspicions in my own mind. Answering my question will help me scum hunt better by allowing me to further develop and rethink my thoughts.

Now, an answer, if you please.

[Furcolow]

I don't feel the need to answer you whatsoever. I do not know your goals are for the town. Your "scumhunting" and questionasking feels very forced to me.

[Furcolow]

I do not like the fact that a slot has had to be replaced numerous times already.

[Furcolow]

just read stigmata in iso

unvote;
vote: don johnson