With 24 players alive, 13 votes are required to lynch.
It is currently
C-Worl wrote:You all realize that the idea of Policy Lynching Jindori was talked about in the sign up thread by multiple players very openly and I was one of them.
C-Worl wrote:I was gonna summarize my thoughts but then Umbrage posted and hit them dead on. I will admit that these aren't my original thoughts. I've just been won over by the argument that was presented.
You think there was nothing wrong with the policy lynch.Umbrage wrote:[Charlie] DISTRACTS PEOPLE WITH TALK OF A POLICY LYNCH.
Excuse me? The illusion of being pro-town?Fuzzy Beavers wrote: That said, I like how DTM told you all we were a hydra. He told me it would give you all the illusion that we were being pro town. I love how his scummy mind works =D.
Random Voting StageAcronach wrote:just wanna say wtf@the11votesonpage1
at least take some time to talk it through, i mean, cmon ppl
UNVOTE: CharliePine wrote:Okay, that last pair of posts from Fuzzy Beavers pushed them up from I'm-probably-overthinking-this territory up above Charlie. Charlie is just as suspicious as before, but he can wait. Combine that with this post, and FBtown looks unlikely. If FB flips scum, we'll have a good D2 lynch of Cojin lined up, too.
Obviously, not everyone can be online constantly. I mean, I`m on a good portion of the time as the mod/a few players can attest, but sometimes other things come up. Sorry bud.Pine wrote: 7. Uprising Has not posted
Come on, people. Thread's been open all day.
I very much agree with this as, clearly, not all of us are in that game.Amrun wrote:I feel uncomfortable with basing wagons on an on-going game. :/
I'm pretty sure that this is not the case. It feels more like a personality clash to me.Occult wrote:My head hurts, I'm starting to think we have lynchers in the crowd.
I very much agree with Cojin on this issue. It is unnecessary to leave yourself a note IN PUBLIC about who you support as a policy lynch this early into the game, or at all. If anything, a note like that should only be issued if and when you vote him.Cojin wrote:I seems unnecessary to post your "self note" on the forum useless you are trying to guide public opinion a specific way while staying under the radar yourself. This is supported by you yourself stating how it is pretty much usless to do.Charlie wrote:Oh. You've read my self-note.Amrun wrote:Charlie, why are you calling someone a lurker sso early?
It serves as a reminder of my supported policy lynches. It is specific to this game (I do not generally support policy lynches: depends on lots of things e.g. game size)
This is just silly. Why on earth would anyone need to bring up policy lynching Jindori in the sign-up thread and then bother to bring it up here? I mean, maybe I'm wrong, but policy lynches being thought out before different teams have been established is silly. IE: The people advocating it in the sign up thread could easily have ended up with him on a scum team or something.C-Worl wrote:You all realize that the idea of Policy Lynching Jindori was talked about in the sign up thread by multiple players very openly and I was one of them.
This just doesn't even make sense to me. How on earth would that give the illusion of being protown?Fuzzy Beavers wrote: That said, I like how DTM told you all we were a hydra. He told me it would give you all the illusion that we were being pro town. I love how his scummy mind works =D.
ya, i'm used to epicmafia. over there that would get you lynched day 1.Pine wrote:Random Voting StageAcronach wrote:just wanna say wtf@the11votesonpage1
at least take some time to talk it through, i mean, cmon ppl
Based on jindori's previous scum performance, I'd probably be evenUprising wrote:This is just silly. Why on earth would anyone need to bring up policy lynching Jindori in the sign-up thread and then bother to bring it up here? I mean, maybe I'm wrong, but policy lynches being thought out before different teams have been established is silly. IE: The people advocating it in the sign up thread could easily have ended up with him on a scum team or something.C-Worl wrote:You all realize that the idea of Policy Lynching Jindori was talked about in the sign up thread by multiple players very openly and I was one of them.
jindori wrote:Why there's otherways to pressure word's are a good way as well. How is it hollow he brought up a point (which i was going to make pulls fist up). The only thing empty and hollow is your defence and questionable vote (aka a policy lynch).Charlie wrote:You need to back up your words with a vote. Otherwise, they're empty and hollow.Umbrage wrote:Now, down to business. Charlie is the lynch today, guys. He was the first one to vote jindori after C-Worl suggested a policy lynch. It wasn't even clear why C-Worl wanted a policy lynch. Scum wanting a quick end to the day? HMM...unvote vote Charlie
FMPOV, charlie was just looking for an easy lynch target.Charlie wrote:^Blatant OMGUS. Delayed, but blatant.
Okay, I was unaware of his performances previously.Pine wrote:Based on jindori's previous scum performance, I'd probably be evenUprising wrote:This is just silly. Why on earth would anyone need to bring up policy lynching Jindori in the sign-up thread and then bother to bring it up here? I mean, maybe I'm wrong, but policy lynches being thought out before different teams have been established is silly. IE: The people advocating it in the sign up thread could easily have ended up with him on a scum team or something.C-Worl wrote:You all realize that the idea of Policy Lynching Jindori was talked about in the sign up thread by multiple players very openly and I was one of them.moreeager to policy lynch if I got stuck with him on my team.
gives a lot of non-specific, vague accusation at the people on his wagon. In fact, on ISO, Charlie actuallyI see I'm the largest wagon atm. Alltown wagon? I think not.
You were probably just sandwiched between people who were posting just fine, and got accidentally highlighted and deleted from the list. But you're goodposting now, so it's irrelevant.implosion wrote:Pine, why did you exclude me from your list of people who hadn't posted?