The Call of Cutthulhufish ÔÇ║ÔîêGame Over!ÔîïÔÇ╣

[Amrun]

I agree with implosion on this one. The non-specific accusations by Charlie bugged me too.

[jindori]

Yahh it's time for my fave segment, the C-worl investigation. Well basicly all of his earlier post were to push a policy vote. This would be considered a null read considering our history togther. About 8-9 pages latter C-worl relises no one is pushing for policy votes anymore. So what does he do, he jumps on the biggest wagon with no reason.

When asked for a reason he says he was won over by umbridge. After that he brought some facts out that made c worl seem scummy. C-worl defends himself with the fact that mutiple players wanted a policy lynch on me. Diverting the subject about why he voted charlie in the first place. Then umbridge pushes harder on Cworl. Cworl defencive barriers start to Heighten and finally presents a reason which seems off in timing. Since a normal players put his/her reason into the original vote.

So noticeable action thus far
1. Trying to keep a dying policy lynch alive 1 scum point
2. When he relised that it is was failing. He jumped onto the biggest band wagon. 2 scum points
3. His posting gets more fraustrated as people push him example a personal attack on umbrage at post 206. You can read the emotion in it. 3 scum points
4. He has also been dodging certain questions.4 scum points

My analyst scum

Unvote Vote C-worl

[DTMaster]

People seem to forget the Hydra aspect that two people are playing on the same account.

[Fuzzy Beavers]

Err oops

People seem to forget the Hydra aspect that two people are playing on the same account.

Anyways while I face palm at MrSuave, gonna give more analysis.

[Amrun]

Does it matter which of you posted that? No one would be attempting to give the illusion of being pro-town if the role in question actually was pro-town.

[Cuttlefish]

Vote Count 1.4

Charlie (5)

- Zyrconium, Fuzzy Beavers, C-Worl, Umbrage, Acronach

Fuzzy Beavers (3)

- Nobody Special, Amrun, Pine

C-Worl (2)

- Cojin, jindori

jindori (1)

- Empking

Cojin (1)

- RICO ACT

Amrun (1)

- PimHel

Pine (1)

- tclawren

Zyrconium (1)

- Cicada

Not Voting (9)

- SharkFinn, Uprising, Raivann, Wild, Lady Lambdadelta, vezokpiraka, Occult, implosion, Charlie

With 24 players alive, 13 votes are required to lynch.

It is currently

00:58

on

April 1st

. Cutthulhufish is due to arrive at

00:00

on

April 7th

.

[Uprising]

vote: Fuzzy Beavers

This is my biggest scumread. Again, I`m not good at explaining my reasons when it is only d1.

[Fuzzy Beavers]

@C-Worl
Um... I thought you were all gun ho about Jin. What happened to that? Are you actually saying that you're dropping a policy case for "le gasp" a scum case after being adamant about it? :s

@Amrun
1. I read that in the sign up thread just now and puts the policy under new light. It really invalidates my earlier statement about exploiting the ongoing game meta.. but there is still a high level of misrepresentation that went on.

2. Le sigh, I didn't even say that. MrSuave is mad at me for revealing our identifies within the first post. The only pro-town aspect about it is a meta read, otherwise you just found out who's the player. There is a clash of the hydra heads going on here.

@Pine
I explained the origins of the joke. I linked to you the game where MrSuave, Nikanor and Cojin all played. You still think MrSuave is serious?

Suave was scum in that game and he was on the losing end when Cojin outed his buddy. Mr Suave-scum making that joke and outing a real buddy isn't a likely scenario. Seriously read that game. There's no cognitive sense in that statement.

@Uprising
1. I noticed that you went straight and commented on items only specific to the last page. I also notice a high level of appeal to emotion play (saying you suck without trying to do an attempt) while addressing only fluffy issues. You only comment on the posting style as a personality clash (which would mean that there are cases that are wrong but you're not talking about it), and talk about the time issue, and the hyperactivity. This is all information that's been stated by other players, and you are quoting and repeating them.

I'm not happy with this post. There's no alignment reads. It's all theory discussion, and filler.

2. You completely ignored the discussion between Pine and I about the whole "modkill issue" Really? That was like 3-4 pages of texts, references and arguments.

[Fuzzy Beavers]

I don't really believe that a hydra claim is pro-town. It's only null at best because like I said it's useful for a meta check. I recommend you do a meta on MrSuave. Note that in order for the mod to let him play I have to hydra with him. It's that bad.

[Fuzzy Beavers]

He's the equivalent to Shotty, before Shotty came to this site. Or the Gandalf/Shotty hydra.

[Fuzzy Beavers]

Actually maybe more like chesskid level play. He's insightful at times.

[jindori]

Fuzzy can you put whos talking underneth each post or get a mod to ip check and label who's posts were whos.

[Fuzzy Beavers]

If you can't differentiate from the posting style I sigh at you. But sure.

- DT

[Uprising]

@Uprising
1. I noticed that you went straight and commented on items only specific to the last page. I also notice a high level of appeal to emotion play (saying you suck without trying to do an attempt) while addressing only fluffy issues. You only comment on the posting style as a personality clash (which would mean that there are cases that are wrong but you're not talking about it), and talk about the time issue, and the hyperactivity. This is all information that's been stated by other players, and you are quoting and repeating them.

I'm not happy with this post. There's no alignment reads. It's all theory discussion, and filler.

2. You completely ignored the discussion between Pine and I about the whole "modkill issue" Really? That was like 3-4 pages of texts, references and arguments.

1. I've been busy as hell today and I'll do that tomorrow. I have not once said I suck, I just said in the beginning of the game, it is more difficult for me to obtain reads in which I am more than 75% certain.

2. I did not ignore it. I didn't feel as though it was a conversation that I personally needed to be part of. There's no reason for it being brought into this game.

[Fuzzy Beavers]

@Uprising
However that conversation answers a bunch of questions that you have. Particularly

This is just silly. Why on earth would anyone need to bring up policy lynching Jindori in the sign-up thread and then bother to bring it up here?

We went over why, and the significance in that argument

Okay, I was unaware of his performances previously.

It'll an understanding of his performance and you'll be able to critically analyze the 4 pro-policy lynchers since they are heavily biased. Weed out the players that are actually trying, from the players that are hiding behind policy and are scummy.

- DTM

[Fuzzy Beavers]

Also that means you are 75 or greater percent certain that I am scum correct? When you do please elaborate on why. Or clarify if this is just your best scum read, - DTM

[Fuzzy Beavers]

EBWOP: It'll bring an understanding... la la - DTM

[jindori]

@fb and dtm thank you, it's just a time saver so i don't have to figure out who is who.
Also what is everyone else's opion on C-worl. I already listed my thought and curious what your's are.

[Amrun]

C-worl is on my suspect list, but not for the policy lynch, but for agreeing with cases that called Charlie's push of the policy lynch scummy.

[jindori]

What do you think about him dodhing certain questions.

[jindori]

dodging

[Fuzzy Beavers]

lololol Ignore me I was lying - DTM

[jindori]

that was obv fuzzy beaver

[Amrun]

What questions did C-Worl ignore?

[jindori]

So... we're not policy lynching Jindori? This makes me a sad turtle.

Unvote; Vote: Charlie

Case makes sense.

In your own words, tell us this case.

I was gonna summarize my thoughts but then Umbrage posted and hit them dead on. I will admit that these aren't my original thoughts. I've just been won over by the argument that was presented.

I was gonna summarize my thoughts but then Umbrage posted and hit them dead on. I will admit that these aren't my original thoughts. I've just been won over by the argument that was presented.

This Is a dodge in my opion. He was asked for his opion not someone elses.