Are
you
kidding?
Let me break this up for you.
ToastyToast wrote:Are you kidding?
No, I'm not.
@Mod: Do SK have to send in a kill each night?
From my experience, they usually have to do so.
I'll answer with this:
Nobody Special wrote:Serial Killer wrote:Each night, you
may
send me a PM with the name of a player that you wish to kill. You win when you are the only player still alive
Its what
I think
happened. Excuse the WIFOM, but mafia would not hold off on a kill this early.
Again, answering with a quote (of the post directly before yours):
cjdrum wrote:There's the other possibility of the Mafia withholding the kill, then saying that there musn't be an SK to...
Actually no
.
Also, with a vig death and a mafia death N0, I am seeing that they killed each other. This only works when paired with tonights results. And vigs do shoot N0, happens all the time.
Mafia died via one of Serial Killer or Vig - no guarantees. Vig died via one of Serial Killer and Mafia - no guarantees. I've heard of too many cases where a kill was held off to make it look like the person was not that role. Too many.
Continuing...
I'm not saying that there aren't other options, I'm just suggesting what I find the most likely and what I intend to be operating on.
It was a very hard and fast decision that you made - even if it was only an "opinion". The fact that you chose that opinion as your own is flippin' scummy.
Instead of looking for individual scumminess, looking for associations (or lack thereof) will be more helpful.
Okay. I'm fine with you using this tactic, but... It wasn't relevant here. You practically change the topic to "Haha, find my scumbuddy, losers... Oh wait, you can't"
And you mean the previous suspicion of me voting you?
No.
lol, yeah cuz those were great reasons. Where, after that little argument, did you mention suspicions on me?
here, then
here also.
when there is a case of crap upon more crap against me, I can't help but get frustrated.
You mean... D1 or D2? I think that it's better to vote somebody based on many small-ish points that I've found than for somebody who is being voted on because they are.
jora gets scumpoints for saying its "all over" if I'm lynched, but its no different from his usual play
Should I rephrase this?
"Jora is evil, we should look into him - but he's all normal, so..."
I can see cjdrum and yabba scum team. cjdrum does not once mention the jackalope wagon. NOT ONCE. Especially when getting close to deadline, you think he would consider it. Looks to me like distancing from a wagon for town credit. Instead he goes after ZF--but no vote!
yabba and cjdrum hardly mention one another. yabba does so only once, when cjdrum says he'll put a vote on ZF. And yet, we never hear a response. And now, instead of coming back and continuing a case on ZF, or giving an answer as to why he didn't put a vote down, he votes me.
I didn't vote because I wasn't going to be there for deadline - if a few others hadn't been there, we could've lynched a PR simply because "the majority" weren't there to unvote.