farside wrote:
No that was the end of his reason. His main reason was he Acro not voting pacman who Acro stated was a 3rd party role.
What are you talking about? Let's review:
This was Bub said about the reasons for his vote on Arco:
Bub wrote:
They were much better than a random vote
I commented
Zdenek wrote:
Also, his reasons for voting Acronach were "much better than random" but now he's going with pressuring a lurker as soon as that wagon starts to fall apart.
Farside wrote:
What? First it's stupid reason then its better then random.........?
As far as I can tell, your post indicates that you thought that I thought that Bub's reasons were better than random. i pointed out that this is not the case:
Zdenek wrote:
"Much better than random" is how Bub described his reasons for voting Acronach.
Your response to that, quoted above, makes no sense.
farside wrote:
zd: my comment was that you found Gollum scummy without a reason.
There is a lengthy case against him laid out by Calcifer, and I think it is reasonable. Considering that the many of the people on my wagon are voting for no reason, I dislike that you are holding me to higher standards than them.
Farside wrote:
So why do you think Gollum is scummy?
Here is what I don't like about Gollum:
Their attack on Bub:
Gollum wrote:
Ad Bubskins, how did you know CJ was not going to play?
was terrible. It misrepresented the events at the start of the game, and if they sctually believed it, I think they would have voted.
That is immediately followed up with hypocrisy:
Gollum wrote:
We do not like Arc. His immediate pressure push of pacmans hider claim without a vote.
I think this attack on Acronach was weak:
Gollum wrote:
Acronach wrote:
ya, mostly site conformity
since i'm used to another mafia site.
We've heard this one from scum before....
I do not think that such a claim is more likely to come from scum or town.
The fact that they were inactive for almost a week, doesn't help my feelings about the slot.
Their recent posts don't make me feel better or worse about the slot. They do raise a good point that an Acro scum flip would make Calcifer look bad.
All in all, I would prefer a Nocmen lynch, but since that is not getting anywhere and it's close to the deadline, so I've put my vote somewhere else.
flinter wrote:
As for the Zdenek case, that one seems certain on scum. His manipulation was obvious, and his defence went to a "clever" technicality.
Explain this.
Pine wrote:
That's L-1, so I'd like to hear a claim out of Zdenek before anyone hammers.
I will claim when we get the 24 hour warning before the deadline or when there is a willing hammer.