P.Edit: Thanks for the tag fixes DH.
Anytime.
--
I feel that T-Bone- and Nacho-scum need to be lynched first. (although Nacho's nothing more than lurker-scum, with a minimum of connections made, he's still scum.)
I have one of those feelings that T-Bone's aggressive play is masking scum motivation by way of shear volume. As such, within the morass, we will probably find links to his partners.
While Nacho appears to be trying to lurk to victory. As such, this would be a low information lynch, but ultimately still needs to happen.
--
On Zepher's iso-case:
0-3: This madness has been addressed before and I still hold him in contempt for it.
*I see the thread is open (well after the game has started), read the thread, made a vote on pine, whom had made several scummy actions
**Pointed out that people were attacking me on false grounds / by differing definitions. Rather than making a comprehensive case, I'd posted my reasoning in a tl;dr form
And lets be honest, would you rather have ~12 near-identical cases on a player, cluttering up the thread, or shorter posts made by people largely in agreement with the present case, with small adjustments from their own povs.
***Expanding upon the T-Bone/Krob connection that I perceived to exist. Note that I still wouldn't mind T-bone hang, while charlie is just a lurker.
****Terminology Disputation
4: The end of his post he over simplifies the argument against him and belittles its credibility
*although it could be seen as an over-simplification, that really is the core of the matter at that point in time.
This guys showed up finally and made a post, in which he agrees with current sentiments, and votes for the same person that others are voting for, because he perceives the same tells that others do.
It doesn't really sound good when put that way :/
5: Over exaggerates and claims a chainsaw defense on C-Worl... since this comes before even the jindori madness the chainsaw claim is overdramatizing the
argument.
* Defending a player by means of attacking the attacker. This is indeed what C-Worl did when he defended krob's attacking me.
Admittedly I probably did exaggerate. slightly. But I was under a moment of zealousness, and the connection seemed evident.
6-8: Nothing special here....
9: Makes a point about multiple wolf factions not being possible, but his comment about Jin bothers me somewhat.
* I play by means of connections. If I can analyse a confirmed scum's posts, provided that he's posted enough, I can usually pick out those he attacked as likely town, while those he subtled buddied as scum. So having Jindori around longer would have allowed for some more concrete connections to be formed.
As it stands, it has been futile to attempt, as his iso is garbage.
10: No. Bad. A summary of things is not enough to call somebody town. Anybody with any intent can do it. Bad move bud.
* Playstyle differences perhaps. I like to use summaries as a tl;dr breakdown, so I can reference to that post, rather than going back through the entire thread repeatedly. I do it as town, so it's become a towntell from my pov. /selfmeta
11: I could get a better read on this post if I understood Chrono's acronyms... It comes off as scummy for now.
Chronopie wrote:@Kise: If the west side ww's [werewolves] needed to outlast the east side w/e [whatever], a kill might have helped them do it. QED link: Goon can still be neutral.
ofc [Of Course] I don't believe it myself, I say he was scum, and BS'ing [bullshitting] on it. w/e.
*Here I was playing Devil's Advocate, "assuming" that what Jindori had been saying was true, then the scenario could have been possible. the disclaimer afterwards was my personal view, at odds with the devil's advocate role.
12-13: Asking Reck to claim
*One of the easiest ways to catch scum out is to ask them, before they get the chance to look over their predecessor's posting, whether what their predecessor claimed is what they confirm. If they confirm, you have them locked into the role, if they deny (or better claim contrary), lynch them.
14: You make a point, but it's still dumb to ask. Reck isn't stupid... I think...
*A simplification, but it got the point across.
15: Make a couple good points, and then adds on a little to Implosion's post. Debatable read.
*This post is pretty straightforward from my PoV. I thought NS was scummy, I pushed the point.
ofc the SK proved me wrong the very same night
16-17: Intentional lurking much?
*Not so much lurking as busy with rl commitments
**Posting a picture for the lulz. Also commenting that, while I was infact still busy, that shouldn't mean that no one else posts.
18: Makes a point about the SK
*A viewpoint I continue to stand by, as removing a source of anti-town kills is always beneficial.
19: Ummm... hmmmm....
*re-enforcing a viewpoint I held, and continue to hold, intended as an addendum to the previous post, as I was unsure whether I would have regular access at that point in time.
20: LOL. 7 posts after a mod threatens to prod and his internet is magically fixed. Convenient much? Otherwise, nothing that wasn't said before.
*While it is ironic, (the distance from the mod post), it was infact the estimate I'd placed on the duration of my absence (note that it was 4 days since the prior posts at that)
The rest of that post was a rapidfire catchup summary.
21: Adds to Quad's list
*Self-explanitory
22: Addressing some things
*Self-explanitory
23: It bothers me how nonchalant he seems with this post. "Ideally he's scum, but a town flip is cool too."
*Again, I work via connections. TC's been fairly active, and we can get almost as much from connections made between scum/who the scum attack, as from genuine townie suspicions, whom may have picked up things that others miss, as no one has quite the same perspectives.
Vote: Conspiracy
You didn't budge after jindori claimed, did you?
