With 13 players alive, 7 votes are required to lynch.
It is currently
Empking wrote:Anybody unvoting anyone who isn't Raivann to vote Metro is scum.
Magistar wrote:All voting Metro, lets say Metro gets lynched through this plan. Does that confirm Raivann as town to you?
Surye wrote:Really not liking Raivann's spastic vote jumping, combined with what feels like sheeping. I see a lot of posting with no actual content, and he loses focus without reason so quick. Looks like he's just trying to see what sticks.
Steph wrote:Sorry, I feel pretty darn clear. My previous ability that was proven wouldn't have been given to scum. If I wind up lynched at any point in this game, that's just silly.
LLD wrote:Oh, that reminds me.
Someone needs to target Zyrconium tonight.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I'd be interested to hear what exactly you targeting yourself would do to you, MoI?
MagnaofIllusion wrote:You have got to be kidding. This is your response? That you are ‘confirmed Town’ in a Bastard Mod game by powers that as best I can determine you were had Day 2 (? Forget for certain which Day) and would only make sense to not give a Mafia member in LYLO. I only have one thing to say on that idea =
Nothing to say about your ‘easy lynch’ scum-slip reaction? Thought not.
The minute we figure out that Magua doesn’t have double-voting power I’m so back on you.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I'd be interested to hear what exactly you targeting yourself would do to you, MoI?
It does nothing as you and C-Worl have been a great help in making my role useless so far ....
I'll explain in more detail if it comes down to it.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Empking wrote:Anybody unvoting anyone who isn't Raivann to vote Metro is scum.
Is English your first language Emp? I ask because this is dense as hell.
Anyone who specifically unvotes players other than Raivann to vote Metro is scum.
By corrallary unvoting Raivann to vote Metro would be a Pro-Town move. Therefore Raivann isn't scum ...
Yet you are voting Raivann …
Stepho wrote:Go ahead. Townies aren't dumb enough to vote for me.
C-Worl wrote:I understand Lady. How have I made your role useless. I haven't targeted you or Lady. Plus my role wouldn't have made yours useless anyway. I don't understand.
Empking wrote:How? Unvoting Raivann means that you think that he's scum for lying about the Double Vote. That's a null tell.
Unvoting anyone but Raivann means that you think Raivann is telling the truth and you're looking for an easy lynch. That's a scumtell.
If you think Raivann is lying scum there is no reason to unvote him to test his claim. You should just want him hanged. If you are not sure if he is lying or not wanting to test the claim is the logical course of action. And in that case you probably would not be voting him in the first place.
Additional use of ‘easy lynch” noted.
What do you think of Stephoscope Emp?
Empking wrote:If you're not voting him then that means you think he's telling the truth meaning you think the target (who were voting before) will die.
Empking wrote:Why?
Occult wrote:All I'm seeing for Steph is the equivalent of someone yelling "He's a witch!"
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Empking wrote:If you're not voting him then that means you think he's telling the truth meaning you think the target (who were voting before) will die.
No, not voting for him means I haven’t concluded with certainty that he’s lying and are open to testing as discussed.
When you want to come out of the “Everything is Black and White” world and join us feel free Emp.
Magister Ludi wrote:I find Steph comment null at best, and I certainly wouldn't be willing to lynch him over it. Of note is Surye quick flight from the Raivann wagon once an appealing (to him I guess) second easy option is offered. He attempts to explain his move but It is weak. Connection here.