Hello all! I'm Magister Ludi (the silent half!) and I finally have time to post.
~~~~~~
malth wrote:He also seems to ignore defending himself, which makes more sense for a townie player then a scum player.
I also have good gut feeling that this is probably a mislynch, but unless Stevie has one hell of a claim (and now, don't do any retarded stalling!) I won't mind him being lynched at all.
This is simply a terrible post, and not one I actually expect to come from someone with a town aligned win condition. Saying someone might be a mislynch obviously implies that you think he is town, yet you push for lynching him anyway, even though you hope and suspect he might have some hell of a claim! This line of thinking is incredibly scummy.
As town, you want to get as many town (hopefully mutual) reads as possible, not vote any of them, and collaborate and hunt down the scum that way.
~~~~~~
Lobstercatapult is also my suspicion. In general, the play has seemed too forced, netural and attempted analytical. (and among other things, Its a feeling one gets from an entire subset of posts of not being protown)
1.
I think you being on Stevie's wagon is trying to get you townie points if stevie flips town, if not (unlikely) you can always refer to your post that you ISOed him for, and be like. seriously, he was looking this scummy, this is how i got my vote. i
in fact, the only thing that i can think of that would weaken you being scum in my mind is amrun looking so scummy.
(This was aimed at nocmen) This is an example of too many conditionals (you aren't scum because X is way scummier!), weak and vieled threats based on possible flips (if stevie flips town then you were trying to get townie points!).
It is not consice and ordered. I have found direct statements usually come from town, wishy washy accusations from scum.
2.
Another quote
"im not against quicklynching, but when a wagon does materlize this quickly on d1, i will definitely suspect there is some distancing/bussing/crap votes on it. like yours, and ill have to look into others."
This is far too blanket a statement to make, leaving room to make accusations at anyone on this wagon, or actually off it. The threat of a vote is leveled against people who may be bussing, (without actually describing really in detail what led him to this to convince anyone of his convictions), and those who aren't on the wagon but are distancing! Plus we have thinly vieled threats against amrun and 'others'.
3.
"why is stevie a mislynch?"
This reply (to kast), one of the only one really detailed with the stevie wagon despite stevie being so close to lynch, seems to imply subtly that lobster thinks stevie might be scum (I paraphrase it as, "why are you saying stevie is town, he seems scum to me").
Lobsters play today has been almost textbook scum, vote away from the large wagon, fail to mention it, Fos strongly someone not your vote, and try and slip through the day.
~~~~~
I'm most interested in Stevie's claim right now anyway so I'll hold off on pushing those wagons for a day or two :p
