Hydra wrote:
In fact, you played in a game called Aggressive Mind Game mafia where scum fakeclaimed a cop guilty onYOU,so I don't think it is outside the realm of possibilities to consider this result here was faked. Yet, you didn't think this was at all possible this game, instead basically sticking on MBL all day. The difference is you knew MBL was scum here.
Of course I considered the possibility. If you don't know that, you obviously didn't read my posts yesterday, since I discussed it at fairly great length. I asked Xantos a series of questions about his actions and motives, figured out he was almost certanly town based on motive and behavior, and then voted for MBL. It's called playing mafia.
The fact that you apparently didn't read my posts yesterday is interesting, since you were voting for me for the entire day. If you weren't even trying to get a read on my alignment, then you must have had some other motive for voting for me; the most obvious one is that you were trying to protect my scumbuddy.
The "aggressive mind games" example is a fairly terrible one, as I'm sure you know. That was a scum who was going to get lynched anyway trying to take a town down with him. As I carefully established yesterday, Xantos had no such motivation at all.
So given the fact two people had been taken out of the equation with a 50/50 chance of scum among them, I immediately latched onto the person who from my perspective I knew had the highest chance of being scum, which was Yosarian2. You're using hindsight bias extraordinarily well there to try and paint me as scum.
Hindsight bias? Pah. I figured out you were MBL's buddy yesterday.
Yes, knowing then what I know now about alignments, I would have voted MBL. But I didn't. I couldn't figure it out, but I could figure out one thing. Knowing I was town, you were the clear logical choice for me to vote, because I was most certain of you being scum.
You "couldn't figure it out"? Bull. You never even TRIED to figure it out, which is a completely different thing. We had a cop claim a guilty on another person, and you did your best to ignore the whole situation and try to distract the town into lynching a third party. If you had tried to figure it out, if you had even commented on which one of the two was more likely scum, that'd be one thing, but you carefully avoided ever doing anything like that, lest you link yourself to your buddy.
That's a classic scum mistake; ignoring the cop claim makes sense if you don't want to lynch your buddy but don't want to be seen defending him, but there's no way a townie would have absolutely no opinion on the whole "cop claimed a guilty on a buddy" situation the way you were pretending t
And as for your last point, you seemed to have rendered it moot by your own words here today. You say that I would be afraid of the gunsmith and vigilante, yet then accuse and bring up the possibility that I could be a godfather, with kill or investigation immunity, which would invalidate your own point here about being afraid of those two roles.
Um, no. I thought you were a godfather when I thought Icerent had tried to kill you and failed, which I thought was the most likely explanation for the lack of a vig kill despite the dead roleblocker. Now that I know that's not actually true, odds are you're probably just a goon.
As a goon, the last thing you would want to do is to let your roleblocker be lynched in a cop-vig situation. You also didn't want to have him confirmed as scum by lynching the cop, though, especally not when a vig was alive. So you took the desperate scum move of trying to lynch a third party.
Your actions make perfect sense from a scum. They don't actually make sense if you were town, though.
I think you're contradicting yourself at several turns, using significant logical fallacies, and have played towards a scum win condition this entire game, which Is why I feel very confident in my vote on you.
Lol. No contradiction, no logical fallacies. You're scum, and you're caught scum.
