Open 333 : Carbon-14 - Game ended

Xalxe · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:58 am

Oh, we're talking about the game now?

WHEEEEEEEE

<3 you saulres.

More thoughts later; I have a paper to write ON MY BIRTHDAY, DAMMIT.

saulres · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:00 am

Aw crap

Cobblerfone · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:02 am

I love how you didn't get it when I posted the thanks for your complement.

You and Whiskers were the stronger town players, IMO.

Xalxe was obvscum but made up for it in the end.

kondi2424 · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:03 am

I investigated Cobbler last night, so this day really looked saddening to me.

Great game Cobbler! And in general everyone!

DonJosh · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:05 am

In post 402, Cobblerfone wrote:

[saulres] and Whiskers were the stronger town players, IMO.

Xalxe was obvscum but made up for it in the end.

And I suspected saulres and Whiskers, and had a town read on Xalxe for half the game. Huh.

Xalxe · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:06 am

Don, I suspect it was because I buddied you SO HARD D1.

What, you lot didn't think I planned that?

Cobblerfone · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:07 am

In post 399, saulres wrote:I did enjoy this game, and wonder if my No Lynch suggestion which Whiskers superbly expanded on serves to somewhat break this setup. Even though we still had decisions to make, it says this setup can be reliably duplicated by starting with two less players, only one scum, and no cop/seer.

I don't think it's quite a

broken

strategy since there were so many ways it could go wrong (mostly if the investigated is a power role). And if you guys had lynched him in the first place, you could've afforded this mislynch without giving away the cop. Unless, I had no-killed.

I think this game is balanced pretty well though. Maybe just a

little

townsided.

kondi2424 · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:08 am

In post 405, Xalxe wrote:Don, I suspect it was because I buddied you SO HARD D1.

What, you lot didn't think I planned that?

I saw it!

Whiskers · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:12 am

The ghost of Whiskers, that silly, pink-marshmallow-pony-riding cat, drifted around the confines of the small place.

"Oh man, I will be so pissed if we lose,"

it said, stroking its whiskers with a paw.

But I have to say, you did an excellent job of rat-hunting, and you stuck very well to my EXCELLENT plan."

Xalxe · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:12 am

Honestly, the No-Lynch plan struck fear into my heart.

Also, I really have issues with the argument that got me investigated, which, as I saw it, was that I was avoiding the thread. IMO, that was a weak-ass argument and Whiskers should have been thoroughly taken to task for it...but we killed her. Meh.

Xalxe · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:13 am

Also (/shamelessplug) you should join The Amazing Race; there's only one spot left!

/shamelessplug

PEDIT: WHISKERS WORDS WILL BE HAD

saulres · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:14 am

Cobblerfone wrote:I love how you didn't get it when I posted the thanks for your complement.

Hit submit and didn't bother to catch your ninja, was busy elsewhere

And thanks for the compliment, it's encouraging (since I lost my first two games ever, this one and the one on the other site I played).

In post 403, kondi2424 wrote:I investigated Cobbler last night, so this day really looked saddening to me.

I really wondered what would have happened if you let Xalxe false-claim on D2, we lynched Mist, and then you did the double-reveal. You would have had a better shot of surviving. But I didn't want to suggest that during the game for obvious reasons.

PEDITS galore (Sure,

now

everyone posts all the time...)

Cobberfone wrote:there were so many ways it could go wrong (mostly if the investigated is a power role)

They wouldn't have been revealed, they'd just show as "yes scum" or "no scum".

kondi2424 wrote:I saw it!

Did you say so? I must've missed it

This is why I wanted to make sure people had a chance to talk and delayed the Xalxe lynch.

Xalxe wrote:the No-Lynch plan struck fear into my heart.

You covered it well.

Mist7676 · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 am

Damn. I'm sorry guys.

*commits suicide*

Xalxe · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 am

Also, cobbler, please to be posting the Mafia QT.

Cobblerfone · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:16 am

In post 411, saulres wrote:Cobberfone wrote:
there were so many ways it could go wrong (mostly if the investigated is a power role)

They wouldn't have been revealed, they'd just show as "yes scum" or "no scum".

They would've been killed.

Whiskers · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:17 am

What. What. What.

What.

What.

Whiskers · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:18 am

Sorry, let me rephrase that:

What.

Whiskers · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:19 am

Mist, you were so obv seer...

saulres · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:20 am

In post 414, Cobblerfone wrote:
In post 411, saulres wrote:Cobberfone wrote:
there were so many ways it could go wrong (mostly if the investigated is a power role)

They wouldn't have been revealed, they'd just show as "yes scum" or "no scum".

They would've been killed.

OIC.

Xalxe · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:20 am

In post 417, Whiskers wrote:Mist, you were so obv seer...

Also, this.

saulres · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:24 am

What did you both see that I missed? The breadcrumb?

Xalxe · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:26 am

No, for me it was more the "I can still be useful in some way"

Mist7676 · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:27 am

It wasn't even supposed to be that way...

I meant if some crazy messed up way I can find the mafia or help by saying smething dumb that actually makes sense....

saulres · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:43 am

In post 403, kondi2424 wrote:I investigated Cobbler last night

I'm curious as to why; if I had been as suspicious the game might have ended differently.

Oh hey and thank for running this, Otolia!

Mist7676 · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:45 am

This was a quick game to get me on my feet. I'm still tripping, but might be playing games a few more.