First off, killerjester, your rebuttal is poor due to you relying on "why would scum do this? What scum motivation is there?" when that question isn't answerable, because they are what we call /slips/.
The main issue I have with his wanted a conclusion to the day is that he is unsure of his reads, yet still wants to dive ahead.
Cobblers rebuttal is bad, in fact, I'll post my specific thoughts on it that I have drafted up, so you can see just what I found poor in it.
Cobblerfone's first point isn't even a direct answer to the argument laid out by VisceraEyes, he definitely contradicted himself and Viscera's point remains valid.
Cobblerfone's second point is basically him saying his personality is waffling, which isn't a personality, that is covering for a scumtell by saying something is that we can't ever prove isn't (or is, for that matter). Secondly, the issue here cobbler is that you had a town read on someone "so large that you can blatantly defend them before page 1 is over", and you stalled your reasoning on it. Then when you finally did reason it, it was a small town tell, if that even. I believe you're talking about
this as his brashness (how is that a display of brashness?) and
this as his single post Fos (how is that a town tell?). This is a poor reason, and Viscera's point remains valid.
Cobblerfone's third point is poor as well. He is saying that he also sees what kcdaspot sees in PM's answers to 3 and 4 (I highly disagree that there was anything wrong with them, but that aside...) cobbler never explained why they were wrong. For those of you who have forgotten,
these were PM's answers. There is nothing really wrong with them at all, in fact there is nothing to really say about them. Later, kcdaspot elaborates that he means it is the tone and that while Links' answers weren't trying to be friendly,
PM is. Which, is completely stupid. It isn't a matter of opinion, cobbler, it is a matter of fact. Viscera's point remains valid.
Cobblerfone's fourth point is that he remembers that there was a certain scum who was townish, but not that there was a certain scum that was lurking, even though he commented on the latter in game. I don't buy it, Viscera's point remains valid
Cobblerfone's fifth point is valid.
Cobblerfone's sixth point isn't something I agree with because it is elaborating on a point that didn't need to be elaborated on, and he does it in a second post, for no reason. But it isn't that big of a deal, and unless viscera was planning on posting libraries of fluff from cobblerfone, it isn't necessary to the case.
Cobblerfone's seventh point makes little sense to me, how does that answer why you want the day to end so quickly?
Eight point is just the seventh point reiterated
Ninth point is essentially conceding to Viscera's point, I believe.
Tenth point I agree with cobblerfone
