Open 346: L.O.V.E.R.S. Mafia (GAME OVER)

SigmaEXE003 · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:14 am

/confirm

Give me, I dunno, 10 minutes to catch up? Thanks. Just wanted to let you know I'm here.

SigmaEXE003 · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:59 am

In post 37, pinkfloyd wrote:SigmaEXE003 is a bigger lurker considering he hasn't even posted in the thread or confirmed here

VOTE: SigmaEXE003 for hatin' on my swag

I'm not even going to bother responding to that.

In post 42, pinkfloyd wrote:Ahh but you see he did confirm, just by PM or even quick topic

Or that.

In post 48, pinkfloyd wrote:SigmaEXE003 hasn't posted and has a nice home under the radar

Or that.

In post 31, chkflip wrote:1] Time zone?

2] What will you be known for in this game?

3] Why did you /in to Lovers?

1) GMT-5
2) I honestly don't know. I haven't played in months.
3) Figured it'd be a quick and easy game to get me back into things.

Pink's reading town. As much as his posting style is anti-town, I have never seen scum do it. I guess this is a case of "So scummy it's not scummy." Scum wouldn't want to attract this early game pressure when they could easily just sit back and do what the others do.

Pads wrote:Curious, though, that you chose me as the inactive to lynch and not the person without so much as a confirmation post. A small difference, to be sure, but given the two I know who I'd choose.

Actually, I'd like to raise a question. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the point of voting inactives to be a sort of prod for them to post? A bit of pressure? So, wouldn't voting the one who 1) acknowledged the game's presence and 2) Has an easy way to access the thread (via "View your posts" at the top of the page) be more productive in that manner? The one who hasn't confirmed would probably never see it, and therefore wouldn't be pressured or prodded, making the vote useless and wasted.

Thomas · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:02 pm

In post 46, chkflip wrote:Thomas, Pads, Emp: you're confident in pinkscum?

No. Random vote. Are you and Empking's Alt the scum?

chkflip · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:37 pm

UNVOTE: Pads
VOTE: Thomas

If you're not confident in pinkscum, why are you allowing him to stay at L-1?

I cannot speak on Empking's behalf; I'm not scum, though. I take it you looked through my wiki?

pinkfloyd · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:48 pm

Pink, completely unrelated, but what does arvo mean?

Afternoon. Sorry about my Aussie slang mate

I'm not even going to bother responding to that.

Or that.

Well can you at least tell us why you didn't come into this game in so long?

Thomas · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 2:30 pm

In post 53, chkflip wrote:If you're not confident in pinkscum, why are you allowing him to stay at L-1?

I cannot speak on Empking's behalf; I'm not scum, though. I take it you looked through my wiki?

Random vote and null read, not town read.

No I did not look at your wiki, just a gut feeling.

pinkfloyd · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:45 pm

So you are happy with me being so close to a hammer Thomas?

Honest Abel · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:21 am

#

Vote Count 1.5

pinkfloyd

(3/4)
: Thomas, Pads, Empking's Alt
SigmaEXE003

(1/4)
: pinkfloyd
Thomas

(1/4)
: chkflip

Not voting:

SigmaEXE003

pinkfloyd · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:41 pm

Pokes please mod!

Pads · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:44 pm

Pinkfloyd wrote:
Thomas, Pads, Emp: you're confident in pinkscum?

I'm confident in nothing until the mod confirms it, but I think Pinkfloyd has reacted to the pressure in a scummy way.

For example, under pressure Pinkfloyd goes from plainsight lurking to:

Pinkfloyd wrote:
Well, pads was lurking and is now posting scummy

1) Feel free to elaborate, but until then I'm going to mark this as OMGUS.

Pinkfloyd wrote:
SO emp will be known for "lynch all lurkers" but he wants to lynch me? Hmm... Not good.

2) You

are

a lurker, a plainsight lurker. So,more OMGUS here.

pinkfloyd wrote: Thomas only wants me gone because I apparently troll (?) and seems like a reckless vote.

3) Appeal to Emotion. Also, recklessness is a townie tell, albeit a minor one.

Pinkfloyd wrote:
SigmaEXE003 hasn't posted and has a nice home under the radar

4) Redirection and fearmongering..

Pinkfloyd wrote:
And chkflip has acted with the clearest head so far.

5) I guess that's a read, but does anyone feel that it's sincere? The one person who is posting and not voting (at the time of the quote) for Pinkfloyd is now the most level headed and townie. Sucking up to a townie that could hammer him and end the game, perhaps?

I had some more thoughts, but sleep is needed.

Honest Abel · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:14 am

In post 58, pinkfloyd wrote:Pokes please mod!

Now, now. It hasn't been 48 hours since anyone's last post yet. Ask again in a little while.

Empking's Alt · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:41 am

===[]

pinkfloyd · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:40 am

Want to actually add something useful emp?

1) Feel free to elaborate, but until then I'm going to mark this as OMGUS.

Elaborate on what?

2) You are a lurker, a plainsight lurker. So,more OMGUS here.

I'd prefer to say I'm chilled out, but that's just your opinion man

3) Appeal to Emotion. Also, recklessness is a townie tell, albeit a minor one.

Would you like me to call you some names and see if you react? haha I beg to differ.

4) Redirection and fearmongering..

I was adding that to many things, so it wasn't redirection. And it wasn't really fearmongering.

5) I guess that's a read, but does anyone feel that it's sincere? The one person who is posting and not voting (at the time of the quote) for Pinkfloyd is now the most level headed and townie. Sucking up to a townie that could hammer him and end the game, perhaps?

Oh because its impossible for town to buddy town?

And in this quote you imply he is town also. So someone not voting me is town?

Empking's Alt · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:43 am

In post 62, pinkfloyd wrote:Want to actually add something useful emp?

That is useful. These "arguments" and "discussions" are a waste of time at the moment.

pinkfloyd · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:37 am

Okay well what discussion would you propose?

What did you eat today? Do you have a favorite snack? Do you like your countries current leader? Did you get the role of mafia scum? Are you pro legalization of marijuana? Do you have any hobbies? Do you play any other games?

Empking's Alt · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:47 am

In post 64, pinkfloyd wrote:Okay well what discussion would you propose?

What did you eat today? Do you have a favorite snack? Do you like your countries current leader? Did you get the role of mafia scum? Are you pro legalization of marijuana? Do you have any hobbies? Do you play any other games?

I support the discussion of when you're getting lynched.

chkflip · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 8:41 am

In post 63, Empking's Alt wrote:
In post 62, pinkfloyd wrote:Want to actually add something useful emp?

That is useful. These "arguments" and "discussions" are a waste of time at the moment.

Agreed. I'm getting more willing to hammer so we reach a lynch, but nothing PF has said has completely abolished my town read of him.

Empking's Alt · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 8:56 am

Unvote, Vote: Sygma

Thomas · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 6:16 pm

In post 56, pinkfloyd wrote:So you are happy with me being so close to a hammer Thomas?

No. What makes you think this?

In post 65, Empking's Alt wrote:I support the discussion of when you're getting lynched.

Support.

In post 67, Empking's Alt wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Sygma

Where did Sigma go...

pinkfloyd · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:37 pm

No. What makes you think this?

Umm... I don't know, maybe because I'm at L-1?

Thomas · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:39 pm

In post 69, pinkfloyd wrote:
No. What makes you think this?

Umm... I don't know, maybe because I'm at L-1?

I'm sorry you got yourself in that position.

pinkfloyd · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:12 pm

LOLWUT?

I haven't done ANYTHING this game so far that is scummy. And I thought you said I was neutral?

Honest Abel · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:19 am

#

Vote Count 1.6

pinkfloyd

(2/4)
: Thomas, Pads
SigmaEXE003

(2/4)
: pinkfloyd, Empking's Alt
Thomas

(1/4)
: chkflip

Not voting:

SigmaEXE003

SigmaEXE003 has been prodded because I won't be here later today to do it. This is his second strike.

chkflip · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:55 pm

I don't like PF's failing about being at L-1 when clearly he isn't, but Sigmascum is making a lot of sense right now.

UNVOTE: Thomas
VOTE: Sigma

pinkfloyd · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:53 pm

I don't like PF's failing about being at L-1 when clearly he isn't, but Sigmascum is making a lot of sense right now.

I didn't realize emp was voting me before he unvoted