Mini 301: Berry Kingdom Mafia II -- (Game Over!!)

Lloyd · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Sun May 28, 2006 4:11 pm

I find it interesting that:
- Today, neither ziliu or Cherry has voted for each other yet
- Cherry has had 2 votes for ~a week now
- Ziliu has 2 votes for ~3 days now, and 3 votes for ~2 days now

If we have a scum trio, I think that:
- Either, both Cherry and Ziliu are scums
- Or, we have scums that are being very careful, and waiting for a reason to lynch either Cherry or Ziliu

ziliu · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Sun May 28, 2006 10:44 pm

Or, the scum trio is indeed Yosarian2, Ameliaslay and Cherry, and Cherry is being careful, (because a townie lynch today does not guarantee mafia win, assuming a scum trio and CA is SK, so mafia probably don't want to give themselves away too easily.) Anyway, I think there are at least one, probably two, scum among the three people voting for me, assuming Cherry is mafia.

Anyway, seeing as I don't want to get lynched before claiming, and I seem to be dangerously near getting speedlynched, I'll claim

I'm a

Cranberry

, the other half of audecesiuvat's masonry, so please unvote me now.

Lloyd · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Sun May 28, 2006 10:50 pm

I also thought of the possibility that both ziliu and Cherry are town, and scums could be waiting for townies to lynch each other.

Unvote

Anyone want to counterclaim ziliu?

TheCesspit · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Mon May 29, 2006 3:33 am

No counterclaim from this quarter.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Mon May 29, 2006 4:00 am

unvote

Yosarian2 · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Mon May 29, 2006 4:04 am

I'll wait for everyone to claim, and see if there's a counterclaim, before I do anything else. Also, Cherry, if you want to claim, this might be a good time to do it.

If Ziliu is mason, that means that out of the other four of you, three are scum. Hmmm....

Blackberry · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Mon May 29, 2006 5:14 am

Kanika Village Vote Count

[/color]

Cherry

:: (2) :: (Bacde, TheCessPit)

ziliu

:: (1) :: (Ameliaslay)

Not Voting: Cherry, Turbovolver, ziliu, Lloyd, Yosarian2

Five Votes to Lynch.

Sending prods to Cherry and Turbovolver.

Ameliaslay · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Mon May 29, 2006 5:33 am

unvote

No counterclaim here.

Turbovolver · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Mon May 29, 2006 12:34 pm

No counterclaim

I still wanna look into Bacde...

Lloyd · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Mon May 29, 2006 5:11 pm

Turbovolver wrote:I still wanna look into Bacde...

Sounds good to me.

Vote: Bacde

Bacde · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Mon May 29, 2006 6:45 pm

No counterclaim here.

Now here is my recent braindrain: Roleblocking is probably the most common ability that scum own. Yosarian's comment about 'out of the 4 of you, 3 of you are scum' caused me to think.

I'd like to know what makes you so happy to vote me lloyd, even though there are MUCH BETTER candidates for your vote.

(Such as Cherry).

Either way I keep getting the feeling that scum should have already won, since there have been MANY a situation which seems like that person could have been quicklynched. (Lloyd, Ziliu, maybe Cherry).

Wierd stuff going on right now. I'll post more when Its not late and I'm not swamped with hw.

Bacde · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Mon May 29, 2006 6:51 pm

Lloyd wrote:
Turbovolver wrote:I still wanna look into Bacde...
Sounds good to me.

Vote: Bacde

Did you read Ziliu's post at all, or are you seriously preferring to listen to the claimed SK?

Lloyd · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Tue May 30, 2006 3:03 am

Bacde,

As for Turbovolver, it's probably in his interest to help lynch scum today. Also, I'm curious whether Turbovolver would actually vote for you not.

One vote doesn't put you in danger. I voted you to gauge your reaction, and get discussions going again.

Between your unvote in post 165, and your vote for Cherry in post 245...

You made no comments about Cherry except for voting for him, even though you commented on ziliu, Amelislay, TheCesspit, Yosarian2, Turbovolver, and I.

Right now, it seems like you voted Cherry to see who would join you. Is that the case or not?

Bacde · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Tue May 30, 2006 12:29 pm

I voted Cherry because his little input into this game has proved to me that finding scum is not in his best interest.

It isn't exactly lurker voting, it is scum voting.

Also Lloyd: When did I say I was in danger when I was put under 1 vote?

If I were Cherry I'd be trying really hard to move the votes on me to someone else.

Lloyd · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Tue May 30, 2006 6:30 pm

Bacde wrote:It isn't exactly lurker voting, it is scum voting.

Sounds good to me.

Unvote

Vote: Cherry

Yosarian2 · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Tue May 30, 2006 10:39 pm

I'm still waiting for a cherry post. He hasn't posted since ziliu's claim moved him back to suspect #1, and I would still like to give him one last chance to defend himself/claim or whatever before voting him. I'm not going to give him forever, though.

Bacde · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2006 12:22 pm

Cherry, speak.

Turbovolver · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2006 2:55 pm

I think I'm liking Lloyd a bit better now. He's asking questions, which can still be a form of skating by, but it seems like his usual style to me. And they are good questions.

Cherry needs to post. I actually replaced Cherry in another game, so I don't know how that's going to go. I'm so-so about lynching Cherry, like I said a while ago, but I'll hammer if necessary.

Ziliu's claim seems rather irrefutable without a counterclaim. So the people I don't support lynching are

TheCesspit
Lloyd
Yosarian2
ziliu

That means I'm OK with

Cherry
Bacde
Ameliaslay

I think my first pick is Bacde. He's calmed down a bit, but his last statement about voting Cherry was completely unsubstantiated. I'd like more info there than just "I don't think he's scum hunting".

The dynamic with Lloyd voting Bacde then removing it after zero logic is interesting... if Bacde is scum my feelings for Lloyd will sour.

Bacde · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2006 3:27 pm

The only reason you thought I was scum was because I wasn't calm? Tell me how playing with an rash tone, as compared to one that is calm, has ANYTHING to do with being scum?

Also I think you are mad at me for spreading the idea to not listen to you, a claimed scum.

Turbovolver · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2006 5:26 pm

Bacde wrote:The only reason you thought I was scum was because I wasn't calm? Tell me how playing with an rash tone, as compared to one that is calm, has ANYTHING to do with being scum?

Tone has nothing to do with it. Trying to shrug off arguments based on

postcount

is avoiding arguments on a poor reason, i.e. scummy.
And that was far from all, thank you very much. In fact I gave a new reason in my latest post, which you've conveniently left unaddressed.

Bacde · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2006 5:51 pm

Funny, I don't see it. If you honestly are getting good protown vibes from cherry, do share them with me.

Turbovolver · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2006 8:28 pm

What? Are you saying we should lynch a player just because there's nothing particularly pro-town about him, even though there's nothing necessarily scummy about him either?

Either you are advocating such thinking, or you are dodging the question.

Lloyd · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2006 8:31 pm

Turbovolver wrote:That means I'm OK with

Cherry
Bacde
Ameliaslay

Sounds good to me.

Unvote

Vote: Cherry

Unvote

Vote: Bacde

Unvote

Vote: Ameliaslay

TheCesspit · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Wed May 31, 2006 10:24 pm

Go go, triple vote!

I'm sticking to my vote (still) until we get something from Cherry. I've no idea if they've gone silent elsewhere.

Bacde · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:06 pm

Turbovolver wrote:
Bacde wrote:The only reason you thought I was scum was because I wasn't calm? Tell me how playing with an rash tone, as compared to one that is calm, has ANYTHING to do with being scum?
Tone has nothing to do with it. Trying to shrug off arguments based on
postcount
is avoiding arguments on a poor reason, i.e. scummy.
And that was far from all, thank you very much. In fact I gave a new reason in my latest post, which you've conveniently left unaddressed.

I'm only dodging your question because you've dodged my answer. I've already stated why I think Cherry is scum. Among every player in this game, he has acted the least townlike, and the most scumlike, and that is even more than you sir, the claimed SK.

The only reason you think there isn't enough evidence is because he has lurked. Lurking amplifies his actions, since he has made less actions in the game.