Weather Mafia II (GAME OVER)

[UberNinja]

That's because it is in my favor.

Scum wouldn't be modifying their claims, they'd make sure to get it right the first time. Conversely, a townie would have no reason to fear doing it.

I clarified that they made a mistake in the interest of transparency and honesty.

[Staeg]

I'm afraid you lost me at the "Scum would..." part

[hasdgfas]

The last post sounds as if you didn't approve of any of the wagons at the end, including BBmolla's, so I'm curious what you were thinking at the time.

Not quite accurate. It was more of a "I'd rather vote for this person, and am not going to change my vote just because you think I should so people can use wagon analysis". I preferred my vote on Tierce then for some reason.

[kuribo]

That's because it is in my favor.

Scum wouldn't be modifying their claims, they'd make sure to get it right the first time. Conversely, a townie would have no reason to fear doing it.

I clarified that they made a mistake in the interest of transparency and honesty.

in Rolling in the Deep, I claimed one shot vig, even though my predecessor had claimed something else.


I claimed that DGB had shot Shattered Viewpoint, and it was pointed out that he had been a claimed cop. I later said that I had lied about shooting SV, that DGB had tried to kill Pine, therefore he was bulletproof. Pine gets lynched and flips SK.

so, you see, sometimes scum do change their claim


Quote tags fixed.
-Glork

[Tierce]

I'm afraid you lost me at the "Scum would..." part

Town points for making me laugh

This.

Proceed with UberNinja lynch.

[Yosarian2]

That's because it is in my favor.

Scum wouldn't be modifying their claims, they'd make sure to get it right the first time. Conversely, a townie would have no reason to fear doing it.

I clarified that they made a mistake in the interest of transparency and honesty.

So...you misread or forgot or got confused about the part of your role that talks about the double vote. Sure. At best, though, it's completly null; there's no obvious reason why you'd have an easier time understanding a confusing role as scum then as town, and I don't get why you're trying to use this as part of your defense.

To make your claim clear; you are claiming that every time there is a sunny day, you will have a double vote, and not in any other weather conditions, is that right?

[Tierce]

That's because it is in my favor.

Scum wouldn't be modifying their claims, they'd make sure to get it right the first time. Conversely, a townie would have no reason to fear doing it.

I clarified that

they made a mistake

in the interest of transparency and honesty.

Emphasis mine.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is a scumclaim. "They" shows the role was discussed in a scumteam QT.

[Glork]

Vote Count 2.9

Amrun 4 (Fate, Untrod Tripod, Staeg, Katsuki)
Staeg 4 (DrippingGoofball, UberNinja, singersigner, shadoweh)
UberNinja 3 (Porochaz, Amrun, Tierce)
Katsuki 2 (Yosarian2, Benmage)
singersigner 1 (MattP)


Not Voting 3 (hasdgfas, Thestatusquo, kuribo)

With 17 alive, it will take 9 to lynch. Deadline is set for Friday, March 30, at 6:30pm EDT.
Katsuki is on V/LA until March 22.


Searching for a replacement for MattP.

[Glork]

kondi2424 replaces MattP, effective immediately.

[kondi2424]

Whaddup whaddup whaddup?

[Staeg]

Whaddup whaddup whaddup?

Have you read the game?

[kondi2424]

No, not yet.

[Shadoweh]

The last post sounds as if you didn't approve of any of the wagons at the end, including BBmolla's, so I'm curious what you were thinking at the time.

Not quite accurate. It was more of a "I'd rather vote for this person, and am not going to change my vote just because you think I should so people can use wagon analysis". I preferred my vote on Tierce then for some reason.

Do you remember why? x: She's not really doing anything different today then yesterday, and a scum flip in a multiscum game doesn't exonerate her if you thought she was guilty for the same behavior, so I'd also like to know what changed your read since you don't want her lynched now.

[hasdgfas]

The last post sounds as if you didn't approve of any of the wagons at the end, including BBmolla's, so I'm curious what you were thinking at the time.

Not quite accurate. It was more of a "I'd rather vote for this person, and am not going to change my vote just because you think I should so people can use wagon analysis". I preferred my vote on Tierce then for some reason.

Do you remember why? x: She's not really doing anything different today then yesterday, and a scum flip in a multiscum game doesn't exonerate her if you thought she was guilty for the same behavior, so I'd also like to know what changed your read since you don't want her lynched now.

I don't remember why or I would have said why.

What changed my read? The crash. I might be comfortable with a Tierce lynch, but UN/Amrun jumped out to me when I read today.

[Tierce]

Cow I'm pretty sure you can fence more than that.

Why aren't you voting?

[hasdgfas]

Cow I'm pretty sure you can fence more than that.

Why aren't you voting?

Because I don't feel confident in ANY of my reads.

[Tierce]

And what do you intend to do to further those reads? Continue semi-lurking? Or try and apply pressure where it could yield results?

[hasdgfas]

And what do you intend to do to further those reads? Continue semi-lurking? Or try and apply pressure where it could yield results?

Probably semi-lurking. I'm not in the full flow of the game right now.

[Tierce]

Sigh.

[Amrun]

That's because it is in my favor.

Scum wouldn't be modifying their claims, they'd make sure to get it right the first time. Conversely, a townie would have no reason to fear doing it.

I clarified that

they made a mistake

in the interest of transparency and honesty.

Emphasis mine.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is a scumclaim. "They" shows the role was discussed in a scumteam QT.

This is a good catch. I caught this, as well, and was going to post about it before I saw this.

I'm glad my vote is already here as we should lynch post-haste. I have no idea how else this post could be interpreted.

[Untrod Tripod]

That's because it is in my favor.

Scum wouldn't be modifying their claims, they'd make sure to get it right the first time. Conversely, a townie would have no reason to fear doing it.

I clarified that

they made a mistake

in the interest of transparency and honesty.

Emphasis mine.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is a scumclaim. "They" shows the role was discussed in a scumteam QT.

unvote, vote UberNinja

This feels SO good

[UberNinja]

That's because it is in my favor.

Scum wouldn't be modifying their claims, they'd make sure to get it right the first time. Conversely, a townie would have no reason to fear doing it.

I clarified that

they made a mistake

in the interest of transparency and honesty.

Emphasis mine.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is a scumclaim. "They" shows the role was discussed in a scumteam QT.

"They" should say "I". Obviously.

[kuribo]

it SHOULD say "I"

but it doesn't.

see, i figured he meant "they" as in the mods who gave him his fake claim

Vote: UberNinja

[UberNinja]

http://youtu.be/bV6iTMaLquw

[kuribo]

you should be alarmed, that's the kinda thing that happens when people scumslip