In post 124, BBmolla wrote:In post 122, Oversoul wrote:What was Scott Brosius's role?
My role. I'd rather not out it for no reason.
Oh I thought it was claimed.
Don't answer that question.
We didn't have any PRs flip correct?
In post 124, BBmolla wrote:In post 122, Oversoul wrote:What was Scott Brosius's role?
My role. I'd rather not out it for no reason.
In post 114, Amrun wrote:izak's recent interactions with RD are pretty effing terrible though.
DeasVail wrote:The main difference for me between Xalxe and Izak is that if Xalxe is replaced or he posts more, I know that I could possibly get a townread on him, but I don't think I'd ever be able to lose my scumread on Izak, so I need him lynched.
In post 127, izakthegoomba wrote:Hoopla has three votes. Xalxe has one.
In post 129, izakthegoomba wrote:Because I have ALREADY TRIED TO GET XALXE LYNCHED MULTIPLE TIMES, AND GOT NOTHING FROM IT.
In post 138, izakthegoomba wrote:Have you expressed any suspicion of Isa before now?
In post 143, Hoopla wrote:Rainbow, why have you decided to vote Isa now after I've left that wagon?
izakthegoomba wrote:Hmm. On that first VC, scum!Isa kinda makes sense, but Isa's vote in the second one just doesn't seem to fit from a scum view. I'm not convinced.
In post 145, Hoopla wrote:This reminds me of the time in Open 353, where you parked a vote on whispersilk during the speedlynch day hoping it wouldn't go through. An Isa vote is avoiding responsibility because nobody is going to lynch him when he's being replaced and when you're the only one voting him now. Pick a current suspect.
In post 135, Magister Ludi wrote:Still looking for an isa replacement. And probably Xalxe too, hasn't posted in nine days here despite multiple prods and reading my pm's and being on the site. Go ostracize him.
In post 147, Hoopla wrote:Do it then. We're not making any progress.