LA = Limited Access
I can only get on about once a day, if that.
In post 73, BK201 wrote:Fair enough, but I think you're overreacting. It's been maybe two days since the thread opened and I have been busy.In post 65, borkjerfkin wrote:Not a fan of NS' cantankerousness, as it will probably get him killed, but this wagon has very little going for it.
VOTE: BK201 One of two "RVS and then lurk" people (the other being kassadin), but he's voting for someone that's currently got a lot of non-RVS votes. This is a call to action for you.
In post 103, BK201 wrote:I'm in 4 mafias right now and I have neglected this one. Imma be active starting tomorrow. Just wanted to let ya guys know!
SaintKerrigan wrote:I said I found it suspicious. It was good enough to warrant a vote at the time. Now I like my vote where it's currently hanging at.
Are you really trying to get into an argument with me over abandoning the glorious NS wagon for a lowly lurker?
Rachmarie wrote:Strong start, questioning people(including me)
Rachmarie wrote:why did you back off of [BK201] BTW?
In post 113, glowball wrote:To be fair it's a 13 player game in day 1 on page 5 with less than awesome activity from some of the players. Any town reads would probably be relatively unsupported as would most scum reads. Why exactly does the amount of nulls this early bother you NS?
In post 114, Kassadin wrote:Im not too sure T&P atm
theoryIn post 68, Lastsurvivor wrote:In post 57, Terrance and Phillip wrote:... Glowball was just giving theory discussion in his last few posts before you said that... theory discussion is null.
Denouncing town reads is scummy. Also, you're really stretching your NS case.
I like my vote where it is.
@Rasp: Thoughts on the game so far? You haven't done much.
That first paragraph seems unnatural speak like "If that in fact is your honest opinion..." when you play scum you arn't playing natural, since you're having to deceive rather than say what you really think, this can lead to speaking unnaturally. That and I feel like glowball is going to be a frequent fluff user. I hate reading through fluff more than anything.In post 70, glowball wrote:In post 69, raspberrylicious wrote:In post 68, Lastsurvivor wrote:@Rasp: Thoughts on the game so far? You haven't done much.
I'm following along, but it's going pretty slowly.
If you are following along why haven't you responded to me?
Here it is for reference:
In post 33, glowball wrote:
raspberrylicious: just a fore warning I do not going for the quote with a vote thing. If you quoted something and placed a vote I want you to explain how that quote affected your vote. Especially so early it seems like the vote had a reason, which means it's not randomso I'd love an explanation.
Do you honestly believe it's going slowly? If that in fact is your honest opinion why not add to the discussion to help us move further along? There is a correlation between productivity and activity, you know.
Following a long and not posting is typically considered lurking and there is more than enough information to comment on. Also, with this wagon building on NS and your first vote still parked there are you content with that and can you explain it?
I too want to know what the point of this was.