@Andrew94
- The following three quotes are the only ones before post #282 that show your suspicion towards me.
In post 43, andrew94 wrote:My first thought when i read post 1, is that venmar seems to try hard to be neutral
' its not mandatory for you to answer' and 'again you dont have to answer'
It seems he doenst wanna 'piss' anyone off, i.e. playing as scum
vote Venmar
- Considering that was very early in the game, you are already partly basing most of your vote on something that happened at the very beginning of the game. The way i presented the RQS i don't think alone should warrant a lynch. I will admit i did look very diplomatic there, but your point is a weak one to back up a full vote.
In post 164, andrew94 wrote:
@Venmar your post 125, about thomith. Did he not say earlier that he was placing an fos until a votecount came? You even said ‘ok’. He then voted later on.
I already responded to this quote on post #167.
In post 185, andrew94 wrote:venmar's random question post seem to not want to alienate or 'piss' anyone off
seemed like careful scum there.
he sheeps several moves like
-Yeah, why are you really arguing with me Thomith?
and
-Why are you voting for me?
when someone else already asked the question.
- You once again, bring up your argument of how i presented the RQS. So far you are working off of little evidence. As for the sheeping part, i was merely agreeing with Arugula when questioning Thomith. I quoted things like that to show my support of Arugula and such.
--------------------
- Point is, the only evidence that i can personally see that Andrew is using against me is how I presented the RQS and some possible sheeping. He also says i did some buddying, but i tried my best to address that in post #167 as well. I am not seeming much more solid evidence other than what i just quoted in this post.
I swear I'm trying my best
--Expect me to be V/LA from 10am-7pm PST every Mon, Wed, Thurs, Sat, Sun due to work--
