@Jager
Your way of replying to me is very annoying to read. Can you quote next time please.
Jager wrote:Your case is OMGUS and you know it.
Uhm, no. If you aren't scum, which I doubt, you have strong confirmation bias.
especially when it is someone as committed to the site as chamber.
How committed someone is to the site has no effect on how I treat them in game. I'm glad that Chamber took nothing I said personally.
this game is incredibly frustrating because honestly arguing a case too long just clogs the game up.
Clogs the game up with useful information and discussion. Your avoidance of the discussion about your case is telling. You'd prefer it if people didn't scrutinize your cases because you know they're faced at town.
I didn't buy that their were docs in the setup
Uhm, why?
And I was right. Neither of the people who claimed doc d1 were doc. You're scum and Mastermind was idiot
A bit harsh. I doubt he's an idiot, no point attacking someone who can't fully explain their actions.
The fact that you were right doesn't make you look town at all. You tried to convince people we were the right people to lynch (with some crazy ass theory) even though "we claimed docs".
Either way my case has absolutely nothing to do with how right you were about there being no docs in me or mmind. It's about the cases you bring up and how you give up pushing them.
really trying to appeal to psyche there, and that is scummy as hell.
It's Psyche's own tell. When I build a case I find it important to include anything that's seen as scummy.
and the only reason to fake claim a power role is if you are scum. Doing it otherwise is just a terrible play.
Well, why so sure what I did wasn't just terrible play? mastermind's claim came from town and he hasn't explained why he did it yet.
and that it is about something I was correct about.
My case is based around your lack of confidence with your own cases.