In post 110, Bitmap wrote:@CooLDoG:
On your second statement on #102, you said "A good way to tell if he is just bad at the game is to get a good pressure wagon going". How do you presume we do this?
How else but to vote the shit out of him? Ask yourself, why do we have an R
V
S? To get reactions, mostly due to a wagon forming.
On your third statement, I know BBmolla wouldn't take offense to what I've said so far but AngryPidgeon insists that BBmolla was in fact "butthurt". I like all types of gameplay and I always tell myself to change up my playstyle in every game to experiment and see which one works best. I'm always active because whether you are town or scum, it's better to be active than lurk.
Who cares what BB thinks of any of this? What BB feels is irrelevant (sorry man, but you know what I'm saying
). Let's stop wasting site bandwidth on irrelevancies and start talking about real stuff. And, if I wasn't clear before, asking about the condition of the game is not an alignment tell period. I simply don't buy it especially when it was asking about a possible reset.
On your fourth statement,
1. Understandable.
2.
Yeah, I should of added this quote. I don't appreciate how he was attacking my sincerity since it wasn't any of his business to do so.
3. Pretty much.
4. I interpreted AfM wrong. What is it called when you're yelling "VOTE FOR BITMAP!" with logical faults and crap in caps and using ad-hominem attacks?
5. His posts are half-junk and half-evidence. It doesn't mix well and makes it hard to take his arguments seriously.
On your fifth statement, I understand I should quote more but I found most of Pidgeon's attacks hard to understand. I'll add more quotes from now on.
On your sixth statement, staying alive is only important if that person contains a PR or is scum. As a VT, best bet is to bait scum into giving obvious hard-evidence scumtells.
2, it could very well be his business to do so. If he thinks your posts are contrived then that is a major scum tell. Also, do you really mean sincere as the actual definition of the word, or do you mean it in some other way? Better yet, give me your definition of sincere.
4, its called pushing a lynch wagon last time I heard.
5, all I can say is deal with it. Hard to understand isn't scummy. Think about it. It might actually hurt scum...
6, no no no, you are misunderstanding. Being hyper-defenseive this early on as a VT doesn't help the town that much, considering that the site meta is against you in this regard. Let me put it this way, everybody wants to stay alive, however, scum only motivation is to stay alive, while the town is more geared to catch scum. PRs have a stronger motivation to stay alive than normal VTs due to the extra powers they can use at night. Put simply, unless you are at l-1 you should only care about scum hunting. And even at l-1 finding scum should still be top priority as town.
Garrr, I'm not that good of a writer, ask Vi or go on the wiki or something
113 No more talk of fear. Talk of bullshit intimidation needs to stop now. Putting words in Bit's mouth (being afraid of hiraki) is counter productive. Again, disagreement is not scummy.
Keep things into perspective, one vote isn't much, say what you want to say and let the town know what info you have. If the person you attack votes for you, who cares!? it is only one vote.
I'm noting a trend of pidg of being quite reactionary. Don't necessarily like it, but it may be his style of scum hunting.
116 being aggressive and borderline reactionary is one thing, bullshit conspiracy theories on page five is another pidg. Also, please remember that if you make a case it is not for us to prove you wrong, but for you to prove yourself right. In action means that your case is a flop with hiraki, instead of pounding on him for it you should be telling us why Bit is the correct lynch. But again, maybe this is your play style... I don't know. But, I want to see where this develops,
unvote, vote: AngryPidgeon
Stop dancing around.
You better have some good reasons for bitmap to be scum. Very very good reasons.
In post 120, AngryPidgeon wrote:^, yes you clearly expressed that you felt I was wrong. I am not saying you didn't. I am saying that you did not 'inform' me that I was wrong (like Arugula in 99 for reference) but rather called me an idiot and implied I was wrong by telling me to back down and calling me an idiot. The difference between you and Arugula's post is your tone of voice. He was 'informing' me that I was wrong. You 'implied' that I was wrong whilst attempting to intimidate me into backing off. It shows a clear difference of motives behind the posts even if you both did indicate that my scumread was wrong.
What the fuck is this? No, no, no. who gives a shit if he wrote a formal disclosure saying that he doesn't agree with you. What the heck? I really don't understand the difference between:
"shut the fuck up, your case is bullshit."
and
"I would like to inform you that your case is bullshit, so shut the fuck up"
Pulling at straws man, trying for that lynch. Scum motivated. Also, vote on bitmap an l-1 crap wagon. Hurray, I got my first scum suspect. Enjoy.
[quote="In
post 124, inte"
Look at Arugula's
Post 99 and tell my that isn't really scummy[/quote]
I agree, vague reasons and a way to hop/slip on the wagon. Still like pidg better though.
In post 134, Tangion wrote:
@cooldog is there any reason that you have not changed your vote yet it seeing as how you no longer seem suspicious of me or are you still and if so why
I did now, but I really wasn't sure where I would put my vote, so I just left it there. I have you in the null pile right now if you must know.
after a wank.
