In post 177, DoubleJD wrote:The Amish tell would be great, but the post directly before asked for my opinion on my predecesor. Your looking for reasons to vote someone instead of reasons people might be scum.
So hi scum, and gg
It looks to me someone who got a scum pm, looked at who you replaced, and saw the (only apparent to
Also, how is voting for you, who I think committed a scum tell, not voting for someone because they are scum?
In post 178, DoubleJD wrote:Also no, just no. You were here long after greyice posted and replaced brindibar.
As I already said, I was waiting for Brun to post, and I hadn't rescinded my post since then since I had essentially been v/la.
Here's my post 84 before Grey joined the game, followed next quite later by my post 139 where I give a late head's up on my v/la. I hadn't read and posted in the thread between those times (or really until today). So no, I really wasn't technically "here" at all to be able to rescind my vote.
Your attempt to try and make up stuff to make me seem scummy is actually rather nullish of you.
In post 180, DoubleJD wrote:Wait, you acknowledge this?
Yup - uh, why wouldn't I? After thinking about it when I realized it though, I still thought it didn't take much away from the tell as it is defined. That only accounts for why you brought it up - not the criticism of your slot.
In post 194, DoubleJD wrote:l: because his attack on me is based on an outdated tell that doesnt even apply. It's an argument for justifying a vote but not finding scum
It's a scum tell used to find scum. Get over it.
In post 194, DoubleJD wrote:Malee: because I have a town read on arugula, and I actually like the reasoning for the random vote on her.
What does your town read on Arugula have