In post 241, shos wrote:Bitmap's posts are bad, I know. but it seems Angry completely ignored that fact.
What did I ignore exactly? I've been talking all about Bitmap's posts and how scummy they are.
In post 241, shos wrote:Bitmap's posts are bad, I know. but it seems Angry completely ignored that fact.
In post 250, AngryPidgeon wrote:In post 241, shos wrote:Bitmap's posts are bad, I know. but it seems Angry completely ignored that fact.
What did I ignore exactly? I've been talking all about Bitmap's posts and how scummy they are.
In post 251, Bitmap wrote:A lot.
In post 241, shos wrote:
After rereading I firstlyUNVOTE Bitmap. This is not because I do not think bitmap is scum; but more of hesitation - someone mentioned the fact that he only joined a few days ago, and that makes a big thing to ignore. we still have time for this day so no rush in lynching him.
In post 241, shos wrote:
for that I want to ask, Bitmap: How experienced in mafia are you? have you played on other sites ebfore? other places? etc?
also, since your posts really are bad, I want to pressure this: what was that thing with the flavor? how comes you all of a sudden made 2-3 posts with that, and then once again all of a sudden, stopped? inconsistency is a bad trait in my eyes.
In post 241, shos wrote:
Hiraki is scum.trust me on this. last game we played is not over yet - but we're both dead there - he played completely different imo. perhaps this will change,it's not enough for a vote yet.
In post 241, shos wrote:
roflcopter is actively lurking, fencesitting, whateveryouwannacallit. ISO him, that just looks bad.
In post 243, Arugula wrote:In post 240, CooLDoG wrote:vote: Arugula
You said people would be insane to hammer, yet you also say that the pressure of a hammer being close would generate the pressure that you needed to get reactions. Enjoy.
Yeah, and? How does that make me scum? No one would hammer at that point, unless they are dumb, but L-1stillfreaks people out, just because it's called L-1. There is always a chance one person can just hammer, even if it would be dumb to do so.
But you made a bad trap and used poor reasoning to hop on my wagon.
In post 242, roflcopter wrote:how is calling for a lynch active lurking or fence sitting?
In post 246, inte wrote:i have meta of Hiraki that suggests otherwise
In post 249, inte wrote:my brain is my source
In post 254, CooLDoG wrote:Angry has some good points I must admit. Shos does seem to be trying to go with the flow. Not sure though, not sure. I think we still need to give him a chance off of v/la. Keep in mind over long periods of time without posting your views can change from post to post simply because a lot happens in between postings.
In post 256, inte wrote:Do you think you're cool for that post?
I'm not actually sure what you're saying here. Did you vote Bitmap for a reaction? Because the first line doesn't make much sense then, especially when you said that a hammer would have been idiotic.In post 234, Arugula wrote:@CooLDoG
We put people at L-1 to get them closer to being lynched. L-1 isn't different from any other vote, except only one more vote is needed to hammer. People freak out and tend to reveal themselves more when they are at L-1. Bitmap didn't really take it into account, so it didn't accomplish what I hoped it would: strengthening my scumread on her or changing it to a town/null read.
In post 258, wierdalexv wrote:
@Bitmap: Why would you hammer if you're that hesitant on Arugula's alignment? We got some time left, I'm not sure why you're in such a hurry to get him lynched.
In post 259, Arugula wrote:Weird, please respond to my reply of your post. You also didn't comment on me calling you scum.
Cooldog, how is putting someone at L-1 to gain info scummy? Unless you think I am talking about a claim, which I'm not. I'm saying that people are easier to read at L-1. What scum motivation do I have to put someone at L-1, who I already know the alignment of, to get reads AND make it easier for the town to read that player?
In post 234, Arugula wrote:
@CooLDoG
We put people at L-1 to get them closer to being lynched. L-1 isn't different from any other vote, except only one more vote is needed to hammer. People freak out and tend to reveal themselves more when they are at L-1.Bitmap didn't really take it into account, so it didn't accomplish what I hoped it would: strengthening my scumread on her or changing it to a town/null read.
In post 250, AngryPidgeon wrote:In post 241, shos wrote:Bitmap's posts are bad, I know. but it seems Angry completely ignored that fact.
What did I ignore exactly? I've been talking all about Bitmap's posts and how scummy they are.
I multi-quoted about a billion posts, and when I was done, I ISO'd you. I noticed that L-1 vote for ABSOLUTELY NO REASONS STATED and realized I hadn't mentioned it. I was too lazy to go back and put it in all the quotes with pretty much the same things about tone, so I wrote about it at the bottom.In post 208, Arugula wrote:@wierd
You didn't mention me at all in your catch-up post besides the little bit at the bottom.
You are. And you were town last game, so what does my vigging you have to do with anything?Arugula wrote:I'm not active lurking, (but you admitted to doing it) and you vigged me last game, so why would a change of tone (which is ridiculous as an excuse for a vote, by the way) incriminate me?
See my last post.Arugula wrote:And again, how was my vote terrible compared to the rest? Just because mine was L-1? As I said before, a hammer would basically be suicide, and L-1 is when people are easiest to read. I still think Bitmap is scum.
What makes you think you'd have to hammer?Bitmap wrote:In post 258, wierdalexv wrote:
@Bitmap: Why would you hammer if you're that hesitant on Arugula's alignment? We got some time left, I'm not sure why you're in such a hurry to get him lynched.
I said I wouldn't mind hammering if I had to.
In post 258, wierdalexv wrote:
@CooLDog, most of the time meta sucks, but the tone of a post can mean a lot.\
Also, why do I feel like we're playing a newbie game with CooLDog as the IC?
In post 259, Arugula wrote:Weird, please respond to my reply of your post. You also didn't comment on me calling you scum.
Cooldog, how is putting someone at L-1 to gain info scummy? Unless you think I am talking about a claim, which I'm not. I'm saying that people are easier to read at L-1. What scum motivation do I have to put someone at L-1, who I already know the alignment of, to get reads AND make it easier for the town to read that player?
In post 262, Bitmap wrote:
If I didn't respond with much emotion, wouldn't that make me town because of how I don't have to worry as much to be lynched on day 1?
shos wrote:it seems you really are too eager to get a lynch here
In post 269, roflcopter wrote:bitmap is this your first game on mafiascum.net?
In post 269, roflcopter wrote:bitmap is this your first game on mafiascum.net?
In post 270, CooLDoG wrote:hay, copter, mind generating some real content?
In post 271, shos wrote:In post 269, roflcopter wrote:bitmap is this your first game on mafiascum.net?
perfect example for what I was saying there. go here.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php?a ... &sr=topics
no finished games.