In post 405, Tangion wrote:ok after doing a general reread and a cople of iso's i feel that not much more can be done without a flip or at least till we hear more from our inactive players I will still stand by my last post as far as my reads go my reread didnt do much to change anything I feel comfortable with roflcopter lynch but if we need an info flip on bitmap i wouldn't mind helping with that I still have my suspisions of him anyway but right now they are much stronger for rofl
Looking for content...
...Unable to find anything that even somewhat resembles it.
In post 409, CooLDoG wrote: In post 403, AngryPidgeon wrote:I think shos is town. Just horribly misguided.
In post 400, CooLDoG wrote:This post seems town. Less emphasis on staying alive, more on scum hunting.
I have so many problems with this statement. Bitmap's entire defense has been fear mongering and OMGUS. Claiming hes ok with being lynched for info is just a WIFOMy gambit and I don't care. It doesn't mean anything because scum are just as capable of saying that as townies. And Bitmap hasn't been scum hunting. Hes been OMGUSing everyone on his wagon and voting for whichever of the people he feels is mist easily lynchable at the time. First it was me, then Arugula, and now roflcopter. Bitmap is scum. Cooldog is now scum for officially starting up the counter wagon.
forget about that defense. Bit is okay with dieing. How is that scum motivated?!?!?!?
Anyway, my vote is a sheep, a good sheep. I didn't start this wagon, I hopped on it.
I thought you were smarter than this, CooLDog. WIFOM is WIFOM.
In post 412, Hiraki wrote:Bitmap wrote:And AngryPidgeon, can you stop sucking at mafia and actually find scum instead of acting like scum?
Horrible feels right here.
Why Mister Hiraki?
Because he said acting.
It's small but significant to me.
I'm going to say he's null for now on the borderline of being scum.
Hm...if you think about it, this actually makes quite a bit of sense.
And why didn't you realize this in the first place?
Grr...I'm not so sure what to do anymore. Really really really need to ISO Bitmap, shos, and Hiraki. I should be able to tackle the other two tomorrow, but tonight I'll just do Bitmap.
In post 45, Bitmap wrote:Holy crap, this bandwagon's speed makes me think that tangion isn't a scum anymore and that scum are on this wagon.
UNVOTE: tangion
I'll have to re-evaluate this choice as I carefully inspect everyone's post.
First to vote, first to back off. This is pretty bad in retrospect, because the point of RVS is reactions to pressure, and due to her own previous RVS vote, she knows that.
In post 61, Bitmap wrote: In post 60, Tangion wrote:VOTE: bitmap
For not only starting the wagon on me but for also being the first to bail as soon as it was put under suspicion
Wouldn't it be more suspicious if I was later in the wagon than the person to start it?
And trying to WIFOM out of it here.
And the AP-Bitmap exchanges made me think he was town.
In post 73, Bitmap wrote:@AngryPidgeon:
Reasons why you smell fishy:
1. Forcing a bandwagon.
2. Ad-hominem attacks.
3. Assuming and mis-reading my context.
4. Appeal to Majority
5. I honestly don't know what you are saying half the time.
VOTE: AngryPidgeon
No, I can't vote for you now. Either you really are really bad at playing scum or just heavy bandwagoning.
FOS: AngryPidgeon
This is a
baaaaad
post though. He seems REALLY nervous to put a vote here. Plus, I see his reasons for voting are kind of off: 1 isn't really a scumtell, 3 is usually just a dumbtell, I dunno where he gets 4 from, and 5 is null.
And then, when told to place his vote, he does without any questions:
In post 128, Bitmap wrote: In post 127, inte wrote:also, it doesn't matter who sounds better or whatever
only matters whos scum
if Pidgeon is scum he will mess up later
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Arugula
Let's get this bandwagon running!
Strange that Bitmap would vote Arugula here, when a few posts earlier:
In post 123, Bitmap wrote: In post 122, inte wrote:hmm
Hiraki town
Bitmap town
AngryPidgeon possible scum
Arugula probable scum
"scumslips" are usually made by careless townies
people who vehemently push them are scummy too
VOTE: Arugula sheep me, forget Bitmap
Why vote Arugula now instead of AngryPidgeon?
In post 140, Bitmap wrote: In post 139, inte wrote:roflcopter do something useful
Tangion/Arugula scumteam
I heard scum just provides nothing really useful and just bandwagon.
I'm looking at you, roflcopter.
I thought you had experience in card mafia. For one, either your players must suck (I've only played card mafia when I taught it to like 11 year olds IRL, so I dunno if everyone's like this in IRL or not), or you're trying to mudsling here. For another, you've 'heard' that scum do this? Because if you've played in real life, I don't know why you'd say 'heard' instead of 'thought' or something similar. And, if you've 'heard' that about forums, I dunno where that whas, because it definitely wasn't here.
In post 154, Bitmap wrote: In post 152, help im a bug wrote:
Man, I had a town read on you until this.
If
you flip town?
But I still find AngryPidgeon scummier for pushing for a wagon based on the word "trying".
Do you expect people to believe me when I say this:
"I am town."
Most people here probably won't so I said "if" instead.
I agree with this post, but recently your way of saying this has changed:
In post 224, Bitmap wrote:Anyways, if we get up to L-1 on Arugula, I can lynch him. However, I think that most people believe I'm still scum.
When asked how much he thought, on a scale of 1-10, Arugula was scum:
In post 231, Bitmap wrote: In post 230, CooLDoG wrote:
In post 224, Bitmap wrote:Anyways, if we get up to L-1 on Arugula, I can lynch him. However, I think that most people believe I'm still scum.
Scale of 1-10, how
sure
are you that he is scum?
once arugula answers my questions I'll see if I'll be a voting for him.
Probably a 4-5.
For one, why the heck would you lynch a player you're 50% sure is scum? I can kinda see scum motivation for posting a 4-5 if Arugula is town though: "Well, I said I wasn't that sure, didn't I?"
And some defense:
Bitmap wrote:And seriously guys, It's day fucking 1. Do you seriously expect to nail the mafia on day 1 and 2 consecutively?
Which brings me to a question that Bitmap conveniently seemed to ignore: What makes you think there's only two scum?
If Bit is scum, I'm willing to bet there's either a traitor or an SK in the game.
In post 380, Bitmap wrote: In post 379, AngryPidgeon wrote:WeirdAlex didn't say anything about roflcopter or am I missing something? At least rofl is accusing people instead of just saying "I am town." which is an entirely useless statement for anyone to make. Is there a play in your playbook other than OMGUS?
Sup Mr. Tunneler. I'm just saying how he commented on my lack of content and fails to realize roflcopter hasn't been explaining any of his sheeping on the Bitmap bandwagon.
And AngryPidgeon, can you stop sucking at mafia and actually find scum instead of acting like scum?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: AngryPidgeon
"Oh crap! Legitimate point against me! OMGUS time!"
And, Bitmap is a LOT scummier in retrospect. I would suggest you all ISO him, and reconsider.
Wow, I'm glad I did that now.
VOTE: Bitmap (L-2, I believe?)
And another thing, I've been thinking about Hiraki, and the way he lets his vote sit on me with absolutely no support really makes me think he's town. Don't see the scum motivation for that.
P-edit: HOORAY FOR WALLPOSTS!