And then I take the time the time to look at the facts and still none of them add up.
1) Eidolon didn't explain why she lied about trying to lynch me. I pointed out where she said I was her best lynch option. I then showed the post where she denied that she was trying to lynch me in my post 327. Why deny it as opposed to admit that she wanted to lynch me but was mistaken at that time? She basically lied about whether or not she tried to lynch me.
*Expects whiskers to poke more fun at me for accusing people who accuse me* - I'll give a pre-emptive response. It is not so much that she tried to lynch me as much as it is about a) she maintained that she had a townread while pushing the lynch and b) she lied about it.
In post 345, Eidolon wrote:
RC, how many times have we argued page after page after page in a game only to find out that we were both town? Thing is, when things start getting heated, you start plucking my nerves, and i start seeing scum in everything you say. I can't help it. You play scummy as town. You refuse to believe that anything you do can be perceived as scummy and thus start thinking i am scum for attacking you.
Even more important than that is the fact that most times we were both town and I am under suspicion, you are usually the person to defend what I am doing since you know I act like that as town. Somewhat like what Whiskers is doing now except in a less harsh way. I've hardly ever seen you use my "scummy town" behaviour to your advantage when you were town.
In post 345, Eidolon wrote:
I honestly can't remember one single time where i tried to argue with you as scum.
Off the top of my head, I can't either. But DDO is an environment I am familiar with and the game mechanics are such that I can develop good reads and defend myself. I also know what to expect and hence lead the day phase. This makes me a poor mislynch target for the mafia and it isn't in the mafia's best interest to go after me.
On mafiascum, not a single person is listening to me. Even whiskers who thinks I am town makes fun of my reads and refuses to take them seriously. I didn't understand a lot of the concepts inherent to mafiascum and to a game like this one. This makes me a much easier target to pick on and get mislynched. The fact that it is whiskers as opposed to you who pointed this out speaks volumes of your affiliation and motivations.
In post 345, Eidolon wrote:
You are pointing out things that aren't a scum tell. Like how i changed my mind from a grey/rgf scumteam to a whiskers/rgf scumteam. What is so scummy about changing my mind when i see something that someone did and think it is scummy?
It was more of your panic at being accused along with your scumbuddy. You started trying to link other people with Grey.
In post 345, Eidolon wrote:
But it's pointless if you keep going on about it because picking apart my posts and adding scum motive behind them doesn't mean that i'm scum. If you think i'm on a scumteam with grey, okay. Lynch grey. try getting me lynched tomorrow.
I was thinking about lynching grey but I am starting to question myself. Let's say you and grey are scum.
- Day 2 - Lynch Grey
- Night 2 - You would killed whiskers
- Day 3 - 5 players will be left (you, me, McStab, Crypto, RGF) - we would likely lynch an inactive since McStab won't lynch you.
- Night 3 - You kill the other inactive
- Day 4 - You, me, McStab. McStab buys that you are town.
I don't know. The two inactives have made the town very weak. But I'll probably settle for lynching Grey since I think he is scum and scum lynches are never bad for town. For me, it is between you and Grey on who I'd place my vote for a lynch.
I still want to hear your response - a real one with facts that doesn't just say "forget that pushed your lynch and later lied about it, we are both town" because I have hard time believing you are.
page 13 sry