In post 416, inte wrote: In post 413, Whiskers wrote:I recall that I was feeling Greywing scum-- I think mostly for attacking RC, but I don't remember. Anyway, if he's not hammered now, then the mod has to find a replacement, and then that replacement, presumably, reads the game and spends a bunch of time, and
then
is hammered.
Anyway, your "fresh set of eyes" hasn't gone nuts with that valuable discussion or anything. You said
yesterday, but... are you stalling? Is there some reason you couldn't discuss yesterday? Some reason you still won't now? If we're waiting on you to "discuss" with your "fresh set of eyes," then by all means, hurry the fuck up.
we have 4 more days till deadline
if, I were scum, what effect would stalling have if i didn't put forth any content yet?
Fair enough.
In post 416, inte wrote:whos fault is it that i have't put forth any content? i made it clear that i had a few things that may be important to say, and i strictly said hammer = scum claim for that purpose
i am a full time student with a part time job and MTW are the only 3 days I work. people DO have lives outside of mafiascum, no matter how much they seem to spam.
ever hear patience is a virtue?
...except that you go and do this.
It is YOUR fault you haven't put forth any content. If you wanted for us to wait for a specific purpose, then you should have said so. We don't know your schedule. You went HAMMER = SCUM which is clearly untrue, so we ignored it and made fun of you for it. Even now, hammer =/= scum, hammer = inconvenience for you because you didn't bother telling us you were busy.
In post 416, inte wrote: In post 414, Whiskers wrote: In post 2, Mortontfrh wrote:8) The town may opt to 'no lynch' in lieu of lynching a player on any day. VOTE: No Lynch is the format for this.
Lol.
I guess I should have read the rules more carefully, we should just No-lynch each Day and let mafia kill off non-chosen townies until endgame. 1
the purpose of this post was? ... scum would just no-kill every night and then the game would get abandoned
what if no-lynching to get more time was going to be one of my strategies that would cut short?
why suggest this option after the fact?
I made this post because the setup disallows no-lynching.
If you had "strategies" you would have posted them. You didn't. That they got cut short is your own fault. Let me rephrase:
you were posting and clearly had the time to post.
If you didn't post a specific thing, then it's your fault.
Moreover, you STILL have time to post things. Want to introduce a strategy? Now is the time,
BEFORE
Night.
In post 416, inte wrote: In post 415, Eidolon wrote:Inte, a fresh set of eyes is nice but you really haven't offered much details or analysis. You say "there's stuff to discuss" but then don't discuss any of it...
So if whiskers wanted to hammer, and the day period was stalling, why hold it off any longer?
because there were things i could have commented on, but no longer have the opportunity to do so because of an idiotic hammer. is that pro-town to you?
buncha kids in this game with no foresight sigh
Bullshit. You have things you STILL CAN comment on, and STILL HAVE the opportunity to do so. But won't, because of an idiotic hammer. is that pro-town to you?
btw if he DOES flip scum, you are so my next target.